green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.8 score
“in determining whether the defendants are subject to jurisdiction under the long-arm statute____the entire transaction must be considered.”
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Citicorp International Trading Co. v. Western Oil & Refining Co.
in determining whether the defendants are subject to jurisdiction under the long-arm statute____the entire transaction must be considered.
discussed
Cited "see"
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Transpacific Corp. (In Re Commodore International, Ltd.)
See Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez, 171 F.3d 779, 790 (2d Cir.1999) (citing Feathers v. McLucas, 15 N.Y.2d 443 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 , 209 N.E.2d 68 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965)); Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King, 126 F.3d 25, 28-29 (2d Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
El Cid, Ltd. v. New Jersey Zinc Co.
See Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc. (1965), 15 N.Y.2d 443 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 , 209 N.E.2d 68 , cert. denied sub nom., Estwing Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Singer (1965), 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mullen
(2×)
Greene v. United States, 454 F.2d 783 (9 Cir. 1971); Smith v. United States, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 38 , 331 F.2d 784 (1964); Williamson v. United States, 311 F.2d 441 (5 Cir. 1962), aff'd per curiam, 340 F.2d 612 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U. S. 950 , 85 S.Ct. 1803 , 14 L.Ed.2d 724 (1965); see United States v. Morrison, 348 F.2d 1003 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 242 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David J. Lewis
See Tr. 676-678. 7 . 373 U.S. 427, 434-435 , 83 S.Ct. 1381, 1385 , 10 L.Ed.2d 462 (1963). 8 . 348 F.2d 1003, 1004 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 242 , 15 L.Ed. 2d 158 (1965). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gonzales v. Harris Calorific Co.
(Newman v. Charles S. Nathan, Inc., supra; Vernon v. Roch-Ledge House, supra; see Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, 15 N Y 2d 443, cert. den. 382 U. S. 905 .) Turning to defendant’s second contention, to wit, that the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations (CPLR 203, subd. [a]; 214, subd. 5), CPLR 207 provides for the tolling of the statute where a plaintiff is unable to obtain jurisdiction over the defendant.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gonzalo Valdes
See United States v. Morrison, 348 F.2d 1003, 1005 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 242 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Lawrence R. Kadis v. United States
See United States v. Morrison, 2 Cir., 1965, 348 F.2d 1003 , cert. den. 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 242 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education
School authorities may act to offset racial imbalance: See Addabbo v. Donovan, 22 A.D.2d 383 , 256 N.Y.S.2d 178 , aff’d 16 N.Y.2d 619 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 68 , 209 N.E.2d 112 (1965), cert. den’d 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America and Linda Stout, by Her Father and Next Friend, Blevin Stout v. Jefferson County Board of Education, United States of America v. The Board of Education of the City of Fairfield, United States of America v. The Board of Education of the City of Bessemer, United States of America v. Caddo Parish School Board, United States of America v. The Bossier Parish School Board, Margaret M. Johnson v. Jackson Parish School Board, Yvornia Decarol Banks v. Claiborne Parish School Board
School authorities may act to offset racial imbalance: See Addabbo v. Donovan, 22 A.D.2d 383 , 256 N.Y.S.2d 178 , aff'd 16 N.Y.2d 619 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 68 , 209 N.E.2d 112 (1965), cert. den'd 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Irving Smalls
See United States v. Morrison, 348 F.2d 1003 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 242 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965); Whiting v. United States, 321 F.2d 72, 76 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 884 , 84 S.Ct. 158 , 11 L.Ed.2d 114 (1963); Williamson v. United States, 311 F.2d 441 (5th Cir. 1962); Acardi v. United States, 257 F.2d 168, 172-173 , (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 883 , 900, 79 S.Ct. 124 , 3 L.Ed.2d 112 (1958); United States v. Ramsey, 220 F.Supp. 86 (E.D.Tenn.1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Olson v. Board of Ed. of U. Free Sch. Dist. No. 12, Malverne, NY
See, Addabbo v. Donovan, App.Div. 2d Dep’t, 1965, 22 A.D.2d 383 , 256 N.Y.S. 2d 178 , aff’d, 16 N.Y.2d 619 , 261 N.Y.S. 2d 68 , 209 N.E.2d 112 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 . 21 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. Naughton
A nondomiciliary “transacts business” under CPLR 302(a)(1) when he “ ‘purposefully avails [himself] of the privilege of conducting activities within [New York], thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws,’ ” McKee Electric Co. v. Rauland-Borg Corp., 20 N.Y.2d 377, 382 , 283 N.Y.S.2d 34 , 229 N.E.2d 604 (1967) (quoting Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253 , 78 S.Ct. 1228, 1239-40 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958)); accord Mayes v. Leipziger, 674 F.2d 178, 183 (2d Cir.1982); see also Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc., 15 N.Y.2d 443 , 457 n. 5, 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 ,…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Four Seasons Gardening & Landscaping, Inc. v. Crouch
See also Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc., 15 N.Y.2d 8 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 8, 18 , 209 N.E.2d 68, 75 , cert. denied 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David Neiman D/B/A London Group (1974) v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., Ltd., James Gourlay and Ingleram Investments, Ltd.
Compare Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc., 15 N.Y.2d 443 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 , 209 N.E.2d 68 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1966), with Braband v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 72 Ill.2d 548, 557 , 21 Ill.Dec. 888, 892 , 382 N.E.2d 252, 256 (1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 928 , 99 S.Ct. 2857 , 61 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Board of Education v. Nyquist
In particular, if a local board of education approved rezoning of attendance areas to correct a racial imbalance, such a purpose would constitute a reasonable basis for its action (Matter of Balaban v Rubin, 14 NY2d 193 , cert den 379 US 881 ; see, also, Matter of Addabbo v Donovan, 22 AD2d 383 , affd 16 NY2d 619 , cert den 382 US 905 ; Matter of Stripolli v Bickal, 21 AD2d 365 , affd 16 NY2d 652 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Applied Hydro-Pneumatics, Inc. v. Bauer Manufacturing, Inc.
Corp., 375 F2d 951), and that plaintiff’s allegation that Bauer’s voluntary election to complete the contracts constituted, in effect, a nunc pro tunc ratification and adoption of BMI’s acts in New York is sufficient to subject Bauer/Electro to personal jurisdiction in our courts on a cause of action arising out of the transaction of business here between AHP and its corporate predecessor 2 (see Evans v Planned Parenthood of Broome County, 43 AD2d 996 ; see, also, Longines-Wittnauer v Barnes & Reinecke, 15 NY2d 443, 460 , cert den 382 US 905 ; 1 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 30…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hutton v. Piepgras
See e. g., Singer v. Walker, 15 N.Y.2d 443 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 , 209 N.E.2d 68 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965); Wurtenberger v. Cunard Line Ltd., 370 F.Supp. 342 (S.D.N.Y.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Amins v. Life Support Medical Equipment Corp.
Compare McKee with the substantial contacts that were the basis of § 302(a) (1) jurisdiction in Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, 15 N.Y.2d 443 , 261 N.Y.S.2d 8 , 209 N.E.2d 68 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 905 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Watwood
v.
Morrison
v.
Morrison
No. 470.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 8, 1965.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.