green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Adam James Jeffery
See Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755, 756 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Association of Independent Television Stations, Inc. v. the College Football Ass'n
See Naumkeag Theatres Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc., 345 F.2d 910, 912 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965) (exclusive rights to motion picture exhibitor to show film commercially justifiable as reaching largest number of viewers with smallest number of prints and enabling first-run theatres to charge premium prices and to receive benefit of word-of-mouth advertising); Sandura Co. v. FTC, 339 F.2d 847, 852-53 (6th Cir.1964) (vertical agreement to create closed geographical areas for distribution of floor coverings justified by need to promote sales …
cited
Cited "see"
Southway Theatres, Inc. v. Georgia Theatre Company
See Naumkeag Theatre Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc., 345 F.2d 910, 914 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Goldman
The term “scheme to defraud” as used in Section 1341 is not intended to convey any technical meaning; it simply requires a plan “reasonably calculated to deceive persons of ordinary prudence and comprehension.” Silverman v. United States, 213 F.2d 405, 407 (5th Cir. 1954); see Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 243 , 15 L.Ed.2d 159 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Rex Curtis
See Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 243 , 15 L.Ed.2d 159 (1965). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Sheiner and Victor Piacentile, A/K/A Victor Pease
See Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755, 756 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 243 , 15 L.Ed.2d 159 (1965) ; Irwin v. United States, 338 F.2d 770, 774 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 911 , 85 S.Ct. 1530 , 14 L.Ed.2d 433 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Federal Trade Commission, Ethyl Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
See, e.g., Naumkeag Theatres Co. v. New England Theatres, Inc., 345 F.2d 910, 911-12 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 241 , 15 L.Ed.2d 158 (1965) (parallel clearances and run schedules by motion picture distributors); Modem Home Inst.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dodge v. People
See also Gusow v. United States, 347 F.2d 755 (C.A. 10th, Colo.), cert. den. 382 U.S. 906 , 86 S.Ct. 243 , 15 L.Ed.2d 159 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Naumkeag Theatres Co., Inc.
v.
New England Theatres, Inc.
v.
New England Theatres, Inc.
No. 474.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 8, 1965.
Timothy J. Davern for petitioner., Robert W. Meserve, John R. Hally and Stuart Aarons for respondents.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.