green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.6 score
“we fail to agree that if we should pronounce there never was any federal immunity on torts that would be in a better position. the government could still have its statute of limitation.”
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hall v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
we fail to agree that if we should pronounce there never was any federal immunity on torts that would be in a better position. the government could still have its statute of limitation.
cited
Cited "see"
Miller v. United States
See generally Pittman v. United States, 341 F.2d 739, 741 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 394 , 15 L.Ed.2d 351 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Tuolumne River Expeditions, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See California v. Federal Power Commission, 345 F.2d 917 , 924 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 394 , 15 L.Ed.2d 351 (1965) (reviewing FPC licenses for the New Don Pedro Dam, outside the original Raker Act rights of way, and immediately downstream from the site of the proposed Ward’s Ferry Dam).
cited
Cited "see"
Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission Indians
See California v. FPC, 345 F. 2d 917 , 923-924 (CA9), cert. denied, 382 U. S. 941 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,592 Paulette Papilsky v. Alvin H. Berndt, and Carl W. Knobloch
See Wolf v. Barkes, 348 F.2d 994, 996 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 941 (1965); Birnbaum v. Birrell, 17 F.R.D. 409, 411 (S.D.N.Y. 1955); Craftsman Finance & Mortgage Co., Inc. v. Brown, 64 F.Supp. 168, 178 (S.D.N.Y.1945).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Confederated Tribes And Bands Of The Yakima Indian Nation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
And that determination can be made only after an exploration of all issues relevant to the "public interest," including ... the preservation of anadromous fish for commercial and recreational purposes.... 29 Id. at 450 , 87 S.Ct. at 1724 ; see also California v. FPC, 345 F.2d 917 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 394 , 15 L.Ed.2d 351 (1965); Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966). 30 The law, then, is well defined: Prior to issuance of a new license, FERC must study the effect …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Id. at 450 , 87 S.Ct. at 1724 ; see also California v. FPC, 345 F.2d 917 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 394 , 15 L.Ed.2d 351 (1965); Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 354 F.2d 608 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pittman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 578.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 6, 1965.
Fred Okrand for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and David L. Rose for the United States.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 9th Cir.
Certiorari denied.