green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Barnco Intern., Inc. v. Arkla, Inc.
(2×)
See Lee Shops v. Schatten-Cypress Co., 350 F.2d 12 (6th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 980 , 86 S.Ct. 552 , 15 L.Ed.2d 470 (1966); Autowest, Inc. v. Peugeot, Inc., 434 F.2d 556 (2d Cir. 1970); Computer Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Qantel Corp., 740 F.2d 59 (1st Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Mearl Dean Bowman and Wanda Bowman v. United States
See United States v. Page, 350 F.2d 28, 30-31 (10th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 979 , 86 S.Ct. 552 , 15 L.Ed.2d 470 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Brachbill
(2×)
See United States v. Kountis, 350 F.2d 869 (7th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 980 , 86 S.Ct. 554 , 15 L.Ed.2d 470 (1966). [3] Other state courts have held that the use of an extension telephone is not the use of an electronic, mechanical or *552 other device so as to constitute an interception.
cited
Cited "see"
Firemen's Insurance Co. v. Cadillac Insurance Co.
See DeRosa v. Aetna Insurance Co., 346 F.2d 245 (7th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 980 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillip Hess v. Upper Mississippi Towing Corp. And Penlatex Barge Lines, Inc., Defendants- Fidelity & Casualty Co. Of New York, Intervenor
Parsons v. Amerada Hess Corp., 422 F.2d 610 (10th Cir. 1970); Eutsler v. United States, 376 F.2d 634 (10th Cir. 1967); see United States v. Page, 350 F.2d 28 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 979 , 86 S.Ct. 552 , 15 L.Ed.2d 470 (1966).
examined
Cited "see"
Larry Luke, Individually v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Larry Luke, Individually
(4×)
See Lee Shops, Inc. v. Schatten-Cypress Co., 350 F.2d 12, 17 (6 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 980 , 86 S.Ct. 552 , 15 L.Ed.2d 470 (1966); Rudd-Melikian, Inc. v. Merritt, 282 F.2d 924, 929 (6 Cir. 1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. Jess
See Eutsler v. United States, 376 F.2d 634, 636 (10th Cir.1967) (concluding that phrase “to others” as contained in Restatement § 413 does not include employees of independent contractors); see also United States v. Page, 350 F.2d 28 (10th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 979 , 86 S.Ct. 552 , 15 L.Ed.2d 470 (1966) (acknowledging that general law on subject reaches same conclusion as to Restatement § 427). ¶ 34 Holding otherwise would create unfair and anomalous results under Utah’s workers’ compensation system: Courts and legal commentators have expressed concern that to allow an i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murdock v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Page, 350 F.2d 28, 30-31 (10th Cir.1965) (right to inspect and implementation of safety program does not necessarily constitute an exercise of control), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 979 , 86 S.Ct. 552 , 15 L.Ed.2d 470 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murdock v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Page, 350 F.2d 28, 30-31 (10th Cir.1965) (right to inspect and implementation of safety program does not necessarily constitute an exercise of control), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 979 , 86 S.Ct. 552 , 15 L.Ed.2d 470 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. Peterson
(2×)
See also Lee Shops, Inc. v. Schatten-Cypress Co., 350 F.2d 12, 16 (6th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 980 , 86 S.Ct. 552 , 15 L.Ed.2d 470 (1966) (pre-dispute profit projections for proposed discount department store extrapolated by expert over the 15-year term of the lease).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Raymond Lurch v. United States of America, Defendant-Third Party v. The Regents of the University of New Mexico and Ralph Kaplan, Third Party
See also United States v. Page, 350 F.2d 28 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 979 , 86 S.Ct. 552 , 15 L.Ed.2d 470 (1965); Norton v. Murphy, 661 F.2d 882 (10th Cir.1981); Flynn v. United States, 631 F.2d 678 (10th Cir.1980); Craghead v. United States, 423 F.2d 664 (10th Cir. 1970); Eutsler v. United States, 376 F.2d 634 (10th Cir. 1967). 10 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Insurance Company of North America v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company
(4×)
See, e. g., Lee Shops Inc. v. Schatten-Cypress Co., 350 F.2d 12, 17 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 980 , 86 S.Ct. 552 , 15 L.Ed.2d 470 (1966), Rudd-Melikian, Inc. v. Merritt, 282 F.2d 924, 929 (6th Cir. 1960). 3 Affirmed. .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schatten-Cypress Co.
v.
Lee Shops, Inc.
v.
Lee Shops, Inc.
No. 716.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1966.
Thomas Wardlaw Steele and Cecil Sims for petitioner., Maclin P. Davis, Jr., for respondent.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.