green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hutchinson J. Kroeger v. United States Postal Service
(2×)
Anderson & Co., Inc. v. Lemos, 832 F.2d 1097, 1100 (9th Cir.1987); Greenblatt v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc., 763 F.2d 1352, 1360 (11th Cir.1985); Davis v. Chevy Chase Financial Ltd., 667 F.2d 160, 172 (D.C.Cir.1981); United States v. Weiss Pollution Control Corp., 532 F.2d 1009 , 1012 n. 3 (5th Cir.1976); Ritchie v. Landau, 475 F.2d 151, 155-56 (2d Cir.1973); see United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co., 384 U.S. 394, 422 , 86 S.Ct. 1545, 1560 , 16 L.Ed.2d 642 (1966) (citing with approval Goldstein v. Doft, 236 F.Supp. 730, 733 (S.D.N.Y.1964), aff'd, 353 F.2d 484 (2d Cir.1965), ce rt.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert B. Elliott v. The University of Tennessee
(2×)
See Goldstein v. Doft, 236 F.Supp. 730 (S.D.N.Y.1964), aff'd, 353 F.2d 484 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 S.Ct. 1226 , 16 L.Ed.2d 302 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Allen v. City of Marietta
See United States v. Collins, 349 F.2d 863 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 *492 S.Ct. 1228, 16 L.Ed.2d 303 , reh’g denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1469 , 16 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Local 771, I.A.T.S.E. v. Rko General, Inc.
(2×)
See Goldstein v. Doft, 236 F.Supp. 730 (S.D.N.Y.1964), aff’d, 353 F.2d 484 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 S.Ct. 1226 , 16 L.Ed.2d 302 (1966); Driscoll v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 60 F.R.D. 230 , 85 LRRM 2237 (S.D.N.Y.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Railways of Central America v. United Brands Co.
(2×)
See Goldstein v. Doft, 236 F.Supp. 730 (S.D.N.Y.1964), aff’d, 353 F.2d 484 (2 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 S.Ct. 1226 , 16 L.Ed.2d 302 (1960); Israel *1377 v. Wood Dolson Co., 1 N.Y.2d 116 , 151 N.Y.S.2d 1 , 134 N.E.2d 97 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
Uniformed Sanitation Men Association, Inc. v. Commissioner Of Sanitation Of The City Of New York
See Davis v. United States, 328 U.S. 582 , 66 S.Ct. 1256 , 90 L.Ed. 1453 (1946). 22 In United States v. Collins, 349 F.2d 863 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 S.Ct. 1228 , 16 L.Ed.2d 303 (1966), objection was raised on constitutional grounds to the introduction of evidence of mail theft where the evidence was obtained from a search of defendant's work jacket.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Town of Bolton Landing
(2×)
Co., 207 F.2d 255 (3d Cir.1953); see also, Goldstein v. Doft, 236 F.Supp. 730 , aff'd, 353 F.2d 484 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 S.Ct. 1226 , 16 L.Ed.2d 302 (1966) (where collateral estoppel was applied to prevent relitigation of factual disputes resolved by an arbitrator)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Capua v. City of Plainfield
See, e.g., United States v. Collins, 349 F.2d 863 (2d Cir.1965), ce rt. denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 S.Ct. 1228 , 16 L.Ed.2d 303 (1966); Allen v. City of Marietta, 601 F.Supp. 482 (N.D.Ga.1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Los Angeles Police Protective League v. Gates
See also United States v. Collins, 349 F.2d 863, 867-68 (2nd Cir.1965), cert, denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 S.Ct. 1228 , 16 L.Ed.2d 303 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. California
(2×)
See also Goldstein v. Doft, 236 F.Supp. 730 , aff’d [ 383 U.S. 960 ] 86 S.Ct. 1226 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 302 ] where collateral estoppel was applied to prevent relitigation of factual disputes resolved by an arbitrator.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Liuzzo v. United States
See e. g., Kington v. United States, 396 F.2d 9 (6th Cir.), cert. den., 383 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 396 , 21 L.Ed.2d 373 (1968); Steele v. United States, 599 F.2d 823 (7th Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Company. Federal Trade Commission v. The Superior Oil Company, Inc., a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Exxon Corporation, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Shell Oil Company, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Company of California, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Mobil Oil Corporation, a Corporation
(2×)
See also Goldstein v. Doft, D.C.N.Y., 236 F.Supp. 730 , aff'd, 2 Cir., 353 F.2d 484 , cert. denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 S.Ct. 1226 , 16 L.Ed.2d 302 where collateral estoppel was applied to prevent relitigation of factual disputes resolved by an arbitrator. 127 336 The Supreme Court has also held that collateral estoppel can be applied when the prior proceeding involved a different government agency because, for collateral estoppel purposes, agencies of the same government are in privity with one another: 337 Where the issues in separate suits are the same, the fact that the parties are not preci…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.
(2×)
See also Goldstein v. Doft, D.C.N.Y., 236 F.Supp. 730 , aff’d, 2 Cir., 353 F.2d 484 , cert. denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 S.Ct. 1226 , 16 L.Ed.2d 302 where collateral estoppel was applied to prevent relitigation of factual disputes resolved by an arbitrator. 127 The Supreme Court has also held that collateral estoppel can be applied when the prior proceeding involved a different government agency because, for collateral estoppel purposes, agencies of the same government are in privity with one another: Where the issues in separate suits are the same, the fact that the parties are not precisely i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
File Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.
(2×)
See also Goldstein v. Doft, [D.C.N.Y.], 236 F.Supp. 730 , aff’d [2 Cir.], 353 F.2d 484 , cert. denied, 383 U.S. 960 [ 86 S.Ct. 1226 , 16 L.Ed.2d 302 ], where collateral estoppel was applied to prevent relitigation of factual disputes resolved by an arbitrator. 17 The Supreme Court has also held that collateral estoppel can be applied when the prior proceeding involved a different government agency because for collateral estoppel purposes, agencies of the same government are in privity with each other.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fred Carl Fisher
See, e. g., United States v. Collins, 349 F.2d 863, 866 (2nd Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 S.Ct. 1228 , 16 L.Ed.2d 303 , rehearing denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1469 , 16 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966); Formhals v. United States, 278 F.2d 43, 46 (9th Cir. 1960); Jarrett v. United States, 92 F.2d 698, 699 (9th Cir. 1937).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Biehunik v. Felicetta
Compare United States v. Blok, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 326 , 188 F.2d 1019 (1951) (search of government employee’s desk for evidence of unrelated petty larceny held not reasonable), with United States v. Collins, 349 F.2d 863 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 S.Ct. 1228 , 16 L.Ed.2d 303 (1966) (search of customs employee's jacket for evidence of on-the-job theft of customs goods held reasonable).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sohnen
See also United States v. Collins, 349 F.2d 863, 868 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U. S. 960 , 86 S.Ct. 1228 , 16 L.Ed.2d 303 (1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Goldstein
v.
Doft
v.
Doft
No. 1047.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 28, 1966.
Jacob Rassner for petitioner. Samuel B. Seidel for respondent.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.