green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.9 score
“s between conflicting claimants, it is well settled that the right to use the same mark is based on priority of appropriation”
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Castricone v. Mical
s between conflicting claimants, it is well settled that the right to use the same mark is based on priority of appropriation
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Michael Kelley
(2×)
See Cunningham v. Heinze, 352 F.2d 1, 4 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 968 , 86 S.Ct. 1274 , 16 L.Ed.2d 309 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Page
Commonwealth v. Stor[c]k, 442 Pa. 197, 200 , 275 A.2d 362, 364 (1971); see Cunningham v. Heinze, 352 F.2d 1, 4-5 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 968 , 86 S. Ct. 1274 , 16 L.Ed.2d 309 (1966); Reeves v. Warden, 346 F.2d 915 (4th Cir. 1965); Holzhey v. United States, 223 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1955); United States v. Blok, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 326 , 188 F.2d 1019 (1951); United States v. Poole, 307 F.Supp. 1185 (E.D.La. 1969); cf. Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731, 740 , 89 S.Ct. 1420, 1425 , 22 L.Ed.2d 684 (1969). ...
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Platou
Commonwealth v. Storek, 442 Pa. 197, 200 , 275 A. 2d 362, 364 (1971); see Cunningham v. Heinze, 352 F. 2d 1, 4-5 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 968 , 86 S. Ct. 1274 (1966); Reeves v. Warden, 346 F. 2d 915 (4th Cir. 1965); Holzhey v. United States, 223 F. 2d 823 (5th Cir. 1955); United States v. Blok, 188 F. 2d 1019 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Lafayette, Louisiana, City of Plaquemine, Louisiana v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Louisiana Power & Light Company, Intervenor. City of Lafayette, Louisiana, City of Plaquemine, Louisiana v. Federal Power Commission, Gulf States Utilities Company, Intervenor
See Alabama Power Co., (Holding Company Act Release No. 15252, June 1, 1965), affirmed, Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. SEC [ 122 U.S.App.D.C. 367 ], 353 F.2d 905 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 968 [ 86 S.Ct. 1273 , 16 L.Ed.2d 309 ]. 71 We turn first to the precedent cited by the SEC.
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Lafayette v. Securities & Exchange Commission
See Alabama Power Co., (Holding Company Act Release No. 15252, June 1, 1965), affirmed, Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. SEC [ 122 U.S.App.D.C. 367 ], 353 F.2d 905 (1965), cert, denied, 383 U.S. 968 [ 86 S.Ct. 1273 , 16 L.Ed.2d 309 ], We turn first to the precedent cited by the SEC.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America Ex Rel. William Cabey H-2519 v. Joseph Mazurkiewicz, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Philadelphia
(2×)
See generally Cunningham v. Heinze, 352 F.2d 1, 4-5 (9 Cir. 1965), cert. denied 383 U.S. 968 , 86 S.Ct. 1274 , 16 L.Ed.2d 309 (1966); Rees v. Peyton, 341 F.2d 859, 862-863 (4 Cir. 1965) Similarly, the Supreme Court has held that a landlord may not consent to a search of premises leased to his tenant, Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610 , 81 S.Ct. 776 , 5 L.Ed.2d 828 (1961), and that a hotel clerk may not consent to a search of a guest's room despite the hotel's continuing right of access to it, Stoner v. California, 376 U.S. 483 , 84 S.Ct. 889 , 11 L.Ed.2d 856 (1964). 21 Relator testified w…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blanchard Importing & Distributing Co., Inc.
v.
Charles Gilman & Son, Inc.
v.
Charles Gilman & Son, Inc.
No. 1023.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1966.
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.