Turpin v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.R., 384 U.S. 1003 (1966). · Go Syfert
Turpin v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.R., 384 U.S. 1003 (1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
74 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 35 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Citizens Coalition for Tort Reform, Inc. v. McAlpine (alaska, 1991-04-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Citizens Coalition for Tort Reform, Inc. v. McAlpine
Alaska · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re MacKay, 416 P.2d 823, 829 (Alaska 1964) (statute in conflict with court rule “was unconstitutional for being an invasion of the inherent power of the court to discipline and disbar members of the Alaska Bar Association”), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1003 , 86 S.Ct. 1907 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1016 (1966).
discussed Cited "see" In Re IML Freight, Inc.
Bankr. D. Utah · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Kalishman, 346 F.2d 514, 517 (8th Cir.1965) cert. denied 384 U.S. 1003 , 86 S.Ct. 1913 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1966); State of Missouri v. Earhart, supra, 111 F.2d at 992; In re Lambertville Rubber Co., 27 F.Supp. 897, 901 (D.N.J.1939), modified, In re Lambertville Rubber Co., supra, 111 F.2d at 45; In re Western Farmers Association, supra, 13 B.R. at 134; 1 W.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Alaska National Bank
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Kalishman, 346 F.2d 514, 517-18 (8th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1003 , 86 S.Ct. 1913 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1966); United States v. Yorke (In re Kerber Packing Co.), 276 F.2d 245, 246-47 (7th Cir. 1960).
discussed Cited "see" In the Matter of Walsh Construction, Inc., Bankrupt. United States of America v. Alaska National Bank of the North and Paul Burlingame, Trustee, in the Matter of Cecilia Ruth Walsh, Gerald Patrick Walsh, D/B/A Beaver Builders, Bankrupts. United States of America v. Alaska National Bank of the North and Paul Burlingame, Trustee
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Kalishman, 346 F.2d 514, 517-18 (8th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1003 , 86 S.Ct. 1913 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1966); United States v. Yorke (In re Kerber Packing Co.), 276 F.2d 245, 246-47 (7th Cir. 1960). 18 The Bank argues that the facts here meet the third exception, alleging that the encumbered property was sufficient to pay the principal and interest on debts to the Bank at the time the Chapter XI petitions were filed. 19 The bankruptcy judge did not find that the Walshes' corporation had sufficient assets at the time the Chapter XI petitions were filed to pay p…
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Stevenson
Pa. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Garrison, supra. Instead, the accusation of bias here, seemingly deliberate, is similar to those found to be contemptuous in United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1003 , 86 S.Ct. 1914 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1966), in which counsel accused the court of running a “drum head court martial” and a “star chamber proceeding,” and In re Buckley, 10 Cal.3d 237 , 110 Cal.Rptr. 121 , 514 P.2d 1201 (1973), cert. denied, 418 U.S. 910 , 94 S.Ct. 3202 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1156 (1974), in which counsel charged, “[t]his Court obviously doesn’t want to…
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Garrison (2×)
Pa. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
In re Dellinger, 461 F.2d 389, 400 (7th Cir. 1972); see United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1003 , 86 S.Ct. 1914 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1966) (contempt upheld where attorney attempted to pressure court into ruling favorably by accusing court of being a tool of the government).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers Appeal of Abraham E. Freedman, Esquire
3rd Cir. · 1977 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91, 94-95 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1003 , 86 S.Ct. 1914 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1966); In re Osborne, 344 F.2d 611, 616 (9th Cir. 1965); United States v. Galante, 298 F.2d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1962). 23 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Bobby G. Seale
7th Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91, 95 (6th Cir. 1965), certiorari denied, 384 U.S. 1003 , 86 S.Ct. 1914 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1017 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re Contemnor Caron
Oh. Ct. Com. Pl., Franklin Civil Division · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, United States v. Schiffer (C.A.6, 1965), 351 F.2d 91, 95 , certiorari denied (1966), 384 U.S. 1003 , 86 S.Ct. 1914 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1017 (warning “generally desirable” but not essential where conduct clearly contumacious), and United States v. Abascal (C.A.9, 1975), 509 F.2d 752, 755 , certiorari denied (1975), 422 U.S. 1027 , 95 S.Ct. 2621 , 45 L.Ed.2d 684 (failure to give warning that conduct may be contumacious not reversible error, but such warning may be appropriate).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re D.C. Sullivan & Co., Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. Robert Robinson, Etc.
1st Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United State v. Kalishman, 346 F.2d 514, 518 (8th Cir.1965) (creditors enti *4 tled to postpetition interest where estate proves to be solvent), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1003 , 86 S.Ct. 1913 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1966); Ruskin v. Griffiths, 269 F.2d 827, 832 (2d Cir.1959) (same), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 947 , 80 S.Ct. 402 , 4 L.Ed.2d 381 (1960); In re Macomb Trailer Coach, 200 F.2d 611, 613 (6th Cir.1952) (if estate becomes solvent, interest is allowed on secured claims to date of payment), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 958 , 73 S.Ct. 940 , 97 L.Ed. 1378 (1953); Littleton v. Kincaid, 179 F.2d 848,…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Leonard Bobby Ortega
5th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91, 96 (6th Cir.1965) (district court had jurisdiction to correct illegal sentence while appeal was pending), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1003 , 86 S.Ct. 1914 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1966); cf. United States v. Hill, 447 F.2d 817, 819 (7th Cir.1971) (district court did not have jurisdiction to correct illegal sentence while appeal was pending).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Naimaster v. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People
D. Maryland · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also City of Chester v. Anderson, 347 F.2d 823 (3 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1003 , 86 S.Ct. 1910 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1966); New York v. Galamison, 342 F.2d 255 , 8 A.L.R.3d 263 (2 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 977 , 85 S.Ct. 1342 , 14 L.Ed.2d 272 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Turpin
v.
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.
No. 1307.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 1966.
384 U.S. 1003
Walter A. Raymond for petitioner. Robert B. Langwoorthy for respondent.
Published

Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.