green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry E. Ruff v. Donald Hodel, Secretary of the Interior and the Bureau of Indian Affairs
(2×)
See Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, 244 F.Supp. 808, 813 (E.D.Wash.1965), aff'd 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruff v. Hodel
(2×)
See Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, 244 F.Supp. 808, 813 (E.D.Wash.1965), aff 'd 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crawford v. Andrus
(2×)
See Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, 244 F.Supp. 808 (E.D.Wash.1965), affirmed 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 (1966) and Eskra v. Morton, 524 F.2d 9 (7th Cir., 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Craig Decker, United States of America v. Raymond W. Marriott
(2×)
See Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, 244 F.Supp. 808 , 814 n.13 (E.D.Wash.1965), aff’d, 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Morton v. Mancari
See *553 Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, 244 F. Supp. 808 , 814 n. 13 (ED Wash. 1965), aff’d, 384 U. S. 209 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bigheart v. Pappan
(2×)
See Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, D.C., 244 F.Supp. 808 , aff'd 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 ; Blanset v. Cardin, 256 U.S. 319 , 41 S.Ct. 519 , 65 L.Ed. 950 ; Ute Indian Tribe of Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. Probst, 428 F.2d 491 , rehearing denied 428 F.2d 498 (10th Cir.); Groundhog v. Keller, 442 F.2d 674 (10th Cir.). 10 As for appellant's contention that she was not given notice and an opportunity to be heard on the question of whether or not she was of Indian blood and met the requirements of section 7 of the Act of February 27, 1925, we hold that appellant's counsel properl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bigheart v. Pappan
(2×)
See Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, D.C., 244 F.Supp. 808 , aff’d 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 ; Blanset v. Cardin, 256 U.S. 319 , 41 S.Ct. 519 , 65 L.Ed. 950 ; Ute Indian Tribe of Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. Probst, 428 F.2d 491 , rehearing denied 428 F.2d 498 (10th Cir.); Groundhog v. Keller, 442 F.2d 674 (10th Cir.).
discussed
Cited "see"
George Groundhog v. W. W. Keeler
(2×)
See Simmons et al. v. Eagle Seelatsee, Chairman of the Yakima Tribal Council, et al., 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 . 9 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SIMMONS ET AL.
v.
SEELATSEE, CHAIRMAN OF THE YAKIMA TRIBAL COUNCIL, ET AL.
v.
SEELATSEE, CHAIRMAN OF THE YAKIMA TRIBAL COUNCIL, ET AL.
1112.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1966.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 26 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.
L. Frederick Paul for appellants.
James B. Hovis for appellees Seelatsee et al. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl and Roger P. Marquis for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.