Mattel, Inc. v. Duncan, 384 U.S. 933 (1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Mattel, Inc. v. Duncan, 384 U.S. 933 (1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1969 · …it is settled that two indictments arising from the same act do not charge the same crime if each indictment requires proof of a fact not essential to the other. ⚠ not in text
15 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gilbert v. United States (nysd, 1969-04-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Gilbert v. United States (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1969 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
it is settled that two indictments arising from the same act do not charge the same crime if each indictment requires proof of a fact not essential to the other.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mattel, Inc.
v.
Duncan
No. 1145.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 2, 1966.
384 U.S. 933
Albert M. Herzig for petitioner. Collins Mason for respondents.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 69%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2)

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.