green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Devalk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
See Fabert Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 355 F.2d 888, 890-91 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 939 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 539 (1966); Three Rivers Motors Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 522 F.2d 885, 893-94 (3d Cir.1975); Ray Dobbins Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., No. 83-M-10-R, slip op. at 4 n. 3 (W.D.Va.
discussed
Cited "see"
DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
See Fabert Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 355 F.2d 888, 890-91 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 939 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 539 (1966); Three Rivers Motors Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 522 F.2d 885, 893-94 (3d Cir. 1975); Ray Dobbins Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., No. 83-M-10-R, slip op. at 4 n. 3 (W.D.Va.
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate of Kennedy v. United States
See, Hamilton National Bank of Knoxville v. United States (C.C.A.Tenn.1965) 353 F.2d 930, 932, note 1 , cert. den. 384 U.S. 939 , 86 S.Ct. 1455 , 16 L.Ed.2d 538 ; Estate of William A. Landers, Sr. (1962) 38 T.C. 828, 837 . 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
Sebough S. Shields v. United States
See Stark v. United States, 351 F.2d 160, 162 (CA 6, 1965), cert. den. 384 U.S. 939 , 86 S.Ct. 1454 , 16 L.Ed.2d 538 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elizabeth Curran v. Ho Sung Kwon, Also Known as Alex Kwon, Revlon International Corporation, Jeremy Foster-Fell
She was not “bereft of the quality of mind essential to the making of a contract.” Kaplan, 182 N.E.2d at 710 ; see also Fabert Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 355 F.2d 888, 891 (7th Cir.) (refusing to invalidate a release in the face of duress claims where the parties have had ready access to counsel), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 939 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 539 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Trade Commission v. Kitco of Nevada, Inc.
See also Benrus Watch Co. v. FTC, 352 F.2d 313 , 324 (8th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 939 , 86 S.Ct. 1457 , 16 L.Ed.2d 538 (1966) (Commission order covering all products manufactured by company upheld); Guziak v. FTC, 361 F.2d 700, 705-06 (8th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1007 , 87 S.Ct. 712 , 17 L.Ed.2d 545 (1967).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ed Houser Enterprises, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation
See, e. g., Fabert Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 355 F.2d 888 (7th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 939 , 86 S.Ct. 1462 , 16 L.Ed.2d 539 (1966); David R.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Benrus Watch Co., Inc.
v.
Federal Trade Commission and Seigmeister v. Federal Trade Commission
v.
Federal Trade Commission and Seigmeister v. Federal Trade Commission
No. 1080; No. 1081.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1966.
Harry I. Rand for petitioners in No. 1080. Harold W. Wolfram for petitioner in No. 1081. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Milton J. Grossman, James Mcl. Henderson, Miles J. Brown and John Gordon Underwood for respondent in both cases.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 352 F. 2d 313.