Hill v. Sperry Rand Corp., 384 U.S. 973 (1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Hill v. Sperry Rand Corp., 384 U.S. 973 (1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Koubriti (mied, 2003-03-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Koubriti
E.D. Mich. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Medlin, 353 F.2d 789, 792 (6th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 973 , 86 S.Ct. 1860 , 16 L.Ed.2d 683 (1966); United States v. El-Jassem, 819 F.Supp. 166, 177 (E.D.N.Y.1993), aff’d, 48 F.3d 1213 (2d Cir.1994).
discussed Cited "see" James G. Perry v. Sherman A. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary
10th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Browning v. Crouse, 356 F.2d 178, 180 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 973 , 86 S.Ct. 1864 , 16 L.Ed.2d 683 ; and see, e. g., Jones v. Smith, 411 F.2d 475, 476 (5th Cir.); and Pedicord v. Swenson, supra. We conclude that we should remand for findings, conclusions and a judgment on consideration of appellant’s testimony along with the remaining evidence.
cited Cited "see" George Billie Smith v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden
10th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Browning v. Crouse, 356 F.2d 178 (10th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 973 , 86 S.Ct. 1864 , 16 L.Ed.2d 683 (1966); and Berryhill v. Page, 349 F.2d 984 (10th Cir. 1965).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Barbosa
S.D.N.Y. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Comulada v. Willingham, 351 F.2d 936 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 973 , 86 S.Ct. 1865 , 16 L.Ed.2d 684 (1966); Shelton v. United States, 234 F.2d 132 (5th Cir. 1956).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Moore v. Marty Gilman, Inc.
D. Mass. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Sperry Rand Corp. v. Hill, 356 F.2d 181 , 187 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 384 U.S. 973 , 86 S.Ct. 1859 , 16 L.Ed.2d 683 (1966) (holding that defendant justifiably relied on plaintiffs unjustifiable silence); Nabisco v. Ellison, 1994 WL 622136 , at *6 (E.D.Pa.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hill
v.
Sperry Rand Corp.
No. 1219.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 6, 1966.
384 U.S. 973
C. Keefe Hurley for petitioner. Edward J. McCormack, Jr., for respondent.
Allocation, Are, Certiorari, Costs, Granted, Question, Should.
Published

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari on the question of allocation of costs.