green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip H. Nicely
See Cupo v. United States, 359 F.2d 990, 993 (D.C.Cir.1966) (“[T]he Rules do not permit cumulation of prejudice by charging several defendants with similar but unrelated offenses.”), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1013 , 87 S.Ct. 723 , 17 L.Ed.2d 549 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Evans v. United States
Super.Ct.Cr.R. 12(b)(2) and 47-l(c); see Cupo v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 324 , 327, 359 F.2d 990, 993 (1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1013 , 87 S.Ct. 723 , 17 L.Ed.2d 549 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Somers
See Cupo v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 324 , 359 F.2d 990, 992 (1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1013 , 87 S.Ct. 723 , 17 L.Ed.2d 549 (1967); King v. United States, 355 F.2d 700, 704-705 (1st Cir. 1966); United States v. Eagleston, 417 F.2d 11, 14 (10th Cir. 1969). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Somers
See Cupo v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 324 , 359 F.2d 990, 992 (1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1013 , 87 S.Ct. 723 , 17 L.Ed.2d 549 (1967); King v. United States, 355 F.2d 700, 704-705 (1st Cir. 1966); United States v. Eagleston, 417 F.2d 11, 14 (10th Cir. 1969). 9 Fed.R.Crim.P. 14 provides, in pertinent part, that: If it appears that a defendant . . . is prejudiced by a joinder of . . . defendants in an indictment or information or by such joinder for trial together, the court may order an election or separate trials of counts, grant a severance of defendants or provide whatever other rel…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Settles v. United States
Id.; see also Cupo v. United States, 123 U.S. App. D.C. 324 , 326-327, 359 F.2d 990, 992-993 (1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1013 , 87 S.Ct. 723 , 17 L.Ed.2d 549 (1967); Ward v. United States, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 136 , 289 F.2d 877 (1961). 6 In this case, because the April 7 charges were not “based on the same act or transaction or series of acts or transactions” as the April 17 charges, we hold that the two sets of offenses were improperly joined.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Melvin E. Jackson, United States of America v. John Johnson
(2×)
See, e. g., Cupo v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 324 , 359 F.2d 990 (1966) (Edgerton, J.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1013 , 87 S.Ct. 723 , 17 L.Ed.2d 549 (1967); United States v. Granello, 365 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1019 , 87 S.Ct. 1367 , 18 L.Ed.2d 458 (1967), and King v. United States, 355 F.2d 700 (1st Cir. 1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cupo
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 443.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1967.
Josiah Lyman for petitioners., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.