green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Pierce
See People v. Fo rd, 416 P.2d 132, 141 (Cal. 196 6), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1018 , 87 S. Ct. 737 (1967), overruled in part by, Peop le v. Satc hell, 489 P.2 d 1361 (Cal. 197 1); People v. Boss, 290 P. 881 , 883 16 (Cal. 1930); Parker, 570 So. 2d at 1051 (citing LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.5 (1986)); Lamp kin v. State , 808 P.2d 694, 696 (Okla.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Pierce
See People v. Ford, 416 P.2d 132, 141 (Cal. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1018 , 87 S.Ct. 737 (1967), overruled in part by, People v. Satchell, 489 P.2d 1361 (Cal. 1971); People v. Boss, 290 P. 881, 883 (Cal. 1930); Parker, 570 So.2d at 1051 (citing LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.5 (1986)); Lampkin v. State, 808 P.2d 694, 696 (Okla.
cited
Cited "see"
Cabral v. State
See Rule v. United States, 362 F.2d 215, 217 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1018 , 87 S. Ct. 744 , 17 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Quatermain, Drax
(2×)
See Rule v. United States, 362 F.2d 215, 217 (5th Cir. 1966), Cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1018 , 87 S.Ct. 744 , 17 L.Ed.2d 554 (1967). 18 In Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39 , 88 S.Ct. 697 , 19 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), however, the Court held that the privilege was not entirely inapplicable to prospective acts.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gaddy v. Michael
See, Jefferson v. Willingham (10th Cir. 1966) 366 F.2d 353, 354 , cert. denied 385 U.S. 1018 , 87 S.Ct. 744 , 17 L.Ed.2d 554 ; Noorlander v. United States Attorney General (8th Cir. 1972) 465 F.2d 1106 (over 14 months); Cook v. United States Attorney General, supra (approximately 5 years’ delay). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hensel v. State
See, e. g., People v. Ford, 65 Cal.2d 41 , 52 Cal.Rptr. 228 , 416 P.2d 132 (1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1018 , 87 S.Ct. 737 , 17 L.Ed.2d 554 (1967); People v. Conley, 64 Cal.2d 310 , 49 Cal.Rptr. 815 , 411 P.2d 911 (1966); see generally W.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zessman v. State
Compare, People v. Ford, 416 P.2d 132 (Cal. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1018 ; People v. Wolff, 394 P.2d 959 (Cal. 1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William John Simon v. Robert I. Moseley, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas
(2×)
Incarceration in a state institution during the time the warrant remains unserved is such a ‘good reason’.” Robinson v. Willingham, 369 F.2d 688, 689-690 (10th Cir.); see also Jefferson v. Willingham, 366 F.2d 353 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1018 , 87 S.Ct. 744 , 17 L.Ed.2d 554 ; Wright v. Taylor, 294 F.2d 592 (10th Cir.); and Taylor v. Simpson, 292 F.2d 698 (10th Cir.).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ford
v.
California
v.
California
No. 883.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1967.
385 U.S. 1018
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.