green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
“we take it to be a proper matter for collective bargaining to establish an orderly and just method for presenting and adjusting grievances.”
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Star Expansion Industries Corp., Intervenor
we take it to be a proper matter for collective bargaining to establish an orderly and just method for presenting and adjusting grievances.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Lite Ray Realty Corp.
See Ranta v. McCarney, 391 N.W.2d 161, 164 (N.D.1986)(“An out-of-State lawyer who is not authorized to practice law in this State ... sits in the same position as a suspended attorney previously admitted to practice law in this State.”) The leading case on the issue in this Circuit is Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corp., 364 F.2d 161 (2d Cir.)(panel decision and decision on reconsideration en banc), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
CHANDRIS, SA v. Yanakakis
See Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corp., 364 F.2d 161, 169 (2d Cir.), [ cert. denied, 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 (1966)].
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Peterson
See Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corp., 364 F.2d 161, 165 (en banc) (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 (1966) (unlawful practice under New York law extends to advice involving federal antitrust law); Per- *673 lah v. S.E.I.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co.
(2×)
See United States v. Kokin, 365 F. 2d 595, 596 (CA3) (carbine together with all parts necessary to convert it into a machinegun is a machinegun), cert. denied, 385 U. S. 987 (1966); see also United States v. Zeidman, 444 F. 2d 1051, 1053 (CA7 1971) (pistol and attachable shoulder stock found "in different drawers of the same dresser" constitute a short-barreled rifle).
cited
Cited "see"
Hakkila v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
See Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corp., 364 F.2d 161, 163 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Brooks ex rel. Brooks v. United States
See Fleishour v. United States, 365 F.2d 126, 128 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arrow, Edelstein & Gross, P.C. v. Rosco Productions, Inc.
See Spa-nos v. Skouras Theatre Corp., 235 F.Supp. 1, 17 (S.D.N.Y.1964) (applying New York law), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 364 F.2d 161 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 (1966); Govern & McDowell v. McDowell & Walker, Inc., 75 A.D.2d 979, 980 , 428 N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company
(2×)
See Jett v. Zink, 862 F.2d 723 , 726 (CA5), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 600 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 (1966); Hilton v. Atlantic Refining Co., 327 F.2d 217, 219 (CA5, 1966); accord, 1A Moore’s Federal Practice 110.161[1], at 209 (2d ed. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram, P.C. v. Hazard
Because defendants’ claim of rescission rests entirely on this erroneous theory which, if approved, would result in out-of state attorneys being unable to practice law in California, the Court dismisses Count X with prejudice. 24 See Birbrower, 17 Cal.4th at 138 , 70 Cal.Rptr.2d 304 , 949 P.2d 1 (indicating that a fee agreement involving an out-of-state attorney becomes illegal when the attorney performs legal services in violation of § 6125, not when the agreement is signed); see also Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corp., 364 F.2d 161 (2d Cir.1966) (en banc), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cross & Cross Properties, Ltd., Cross-Appellant v. Everett Allied Company, Cross-Appellee
“It is a well settled and salutary rule that a party cannot insist upon a condition precedent, when its nonperformance has been caused by himself.” Young v. Hunter, 6 N.Y. 203, 207 (1852); see, e.g., Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corp., 364 F.2d 161, 169 (2d Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 *502 L.Ed.2d 448 (1966); Kooleraire Serv. & Installation Corp. v. Board of Educ., 28 N.Y.2d 101, 106 , 268 N.E.2d 782, 784 , 320 N.Y.S.2d 46, 48 (1971); McIntosh Ready Mix Concrete Corp. v. R.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kennedy v. Bar Ass'n of Montgomery County, Inc.
Compare Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corp., 364 F.2d 161 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 (1966) (in banc) (client liable for fees for out-of-court services rendered over five year period by attorney admitted in California in connection with antitrust case pending in federal court in New York where, if application had been made, California attorney would have been admitted pro hac vice) and Appell v. Reiner, 43 N.J. 313 , 204 A.2d 146 (1964) (client’s promise to pay fees enforceable where New York attorney’s services in New Jersey, where attorney was not …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ranta v. McCarney
(2×)
See, e.g., Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corporation, 235 F.Supp. 1 (S.D.N.Y. 1964), affirmed in relevant part, 364 F.2d 161 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 (1966); Cowen v. Calabrese, 230 Cal.App.2d 870 , 41 Cal.Rptr. 441 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Larry Cannon v. United States
Compare Cohen v. United States, 252 F.Supp. 679 (N.D.Ga.1966), rev’d on other grounds, 389 F.2d 689 (5th Cir. 1967) (negligence found) with Fleishour v. United States, 244 F.Supp. 762 (N.D.Ill.1965), aff’d, 365 F.2d 126 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 (1966) (no negligence found). 5 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wasson v. Northrup Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc.
See, e. g., Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corporation, 235 F.Supp. 1 (S.D.N.Y.1964), aff’d 364 F.2d 161 (2nd Cir. 1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 (1966).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Wilson Evans, II
See also Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corp., 235 F.Supp. 1, 11 (S.D.N.Y.1964), 1 cert. de *1008 nied, 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 (1966).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnnie Wilson
Compare the facts in United States v. Kokin, 365 F.2d 595 (3rd Cir. 1966), cert. den. 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. General Electric Company, and International Union of Electrical, Radio, and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor
(2×)
See also NLRB v. Celotex Corp., 364 F.2d 552, 554 (5th Cir. 1966), cert, denied 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 601 , 17 L.Ed. 2d 450 (1966).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sawyer v. United States
See also Fleishour v. United States 365 F.2d 126 (7 Cir.) cert. denied 385 U.S. 987 , 87 S.Ct. 597 , 17 L.Ed.2d 448 ; Klein v. United States, 339 F.2d 512 (2 Cir.).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Skouras Theatres Corp.
v.
Spanos
v.
Spanos
No. 605.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 12, 1966.
Milton C. Wsisman and Harry I. Rand for petitioners., Leo T. Kissam, Eugene Gressman and Richard Gyory for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.