green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Amos S. Tinker v. United States
it would indeed have been wrong to permit cross-examination on the score of homosexuality merely to discredit character .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Barbati
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
the notion that evidentiary use of anything emerging from the mouth is banned unless it comes within an exception to the hearsay rule is as fallacious as it is durable
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark Z. Greenberg v. United States of America Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
(2×)
See Datlof v. United States, 252 F.Supp. 11, 32-33 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 370 F.2d 655 (3d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 624 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Corbett
See United States v. Nuccio, 373 F.2d 168 , 174 n. 4 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 623 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. Jones
Accord, Mag.R. at 5-6; see note 3 supra. 6 In this regard, it is significant to note that while probative evidence casting doubt on a witness’ mental stability at the time of the incident about which he testifies may, of course, be used to discredit him, see United States v. McFarland, 371 F.2d 701, 705 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1689 , 18 L.Ed.2d 624 (1967); see also United States v. Hiss, 88 F.Supp. 559 (S.D.N.Y.1950), not all psychiatric reports about prosecution witnesses are sufficiently probative to require disclosure and/or free use in cross-examination.
cited
Cited "see"
Internal Revenue Service v. Blais
See Datlof v. United States, 252 F.Supp., 11, 32-33 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 370 F.2d 655 (3d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 624 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. United States
See Datlof v. United States, 252 F.Supp. 11, 32 (E.D.Pa.1966), aff’d, 370 F.2d 655 (3rd Cir.1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 624 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Cooper v. United States
See Datlof v. United States, 252 F.Supp. 11, 32-3 (E.D.Pa.1966), aff’d., 370 F.2d 655 (3d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 624 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Saxe
See Spivak v. United States, 254 F.Supp. 517 (S.D.N.Y. 1966), aff’d, 370 F.2d 612 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 387 U.S. 908 , 87 S.Ct. 1690 , 18 L.Ed.2d 625 (1967); See Datlof v. United States, 252 F.Supp. 11 (E.D.Pa.1966), aff’d 370 F.2d 655 (3rd Cir. 1966), cert, denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 624 (1967); Smith v. Commissioner, 34 T.C. 110 (1960) aff’d 294 F.2d 957 (5th Cir. 1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Adams v. United States
See Comm’r. v. Anderson, 371 F. 2d 59, 64 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Cerveny
See United States v. McFarland, 371 F.2d 701, 703 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 387 U.S. 906 (1966); United States v. Marchisio, 344 F.2d 653, 665 (2d Cir. 1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Monday v. United States
See Datlof v. United States, 370 F.2d 655 (3rd Cir. 1966), cert. denied 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 624 (1967); Cash v. Campbell, 346 F.2d 670 (5th Cir. 1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Marquez and Radames Mas
(2×)
See United States v. Nuccio, 373 F.2d 168 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 623 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Mingoia and Herbert Richman
See, however, United States v. Nuccio, 373 F.2d 168, 171-173 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 623 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Philip Arcuri and Alfred John Cimei
See United States v. Nuccio, 373 F.2d 168, 173-174 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 623 (1967), and cases there cited.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shmuel David, United States of America v. Jaime Toro Aristizibal, United States of America v. Amparo Toro Aristizibal, United States of America v. Yehuda Yarden
See United States v. Gilley, 836 F.2d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir.1988); United States v. Marolla, 766 F.2d 457, 461 (11th Cir.1985); United States v. Guerro, 693 F.2d 10, 13 (1st Cir.1982); United States v. Waldron, 590 F.2d 33, 34 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 2056 , 60 L.Ed.2d 662 (1979); see also United States v. Nuccio, 373 F.2d 168 , 174 n. 4 (2d Cir.) ("no proof of actual dealings in narcotics is required to establish conspiracy to violate the narcotics laws"), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 623 (1967). 48 Moreover, the evidence that Yarden enlisted …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David
The law is well settled that a criminal conspiracy can exist despite the eventual fail- See United States v. Gilley, 836 F.2d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir.1988); United States v. Marolla, 766 F.2d 457, 461 (11th Cir.1985); United States v. Guerra, 693 F.2d 10, 13 (1st Cir.1982); United States v. Waldron, 590 F.2d 33, 34 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 2056 , 60 L.Ed.2d 662 (1979); see also United States v. Nuccio, 373 F.2d 168 , 174 n. 4 (2d Cir.) (“no proof of actual dealings in narcotics is required to establish conspiracy to violate the narcotics laws”), cert. denied, 387 U.S. …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Frost
See, e.g., Datlof v. United States, 370 F.2d 655 (3rd Cir. 1966), cert. denied 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 624 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harold E. Harrington v. United States
Compare, Datlof v. United States, 252 F.Supp. 11 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d 370 F.2d 655 (3d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 624 (1967) with United States v. Slattery, 224 F.Supp. 214 (E.D.Pa.1963), aff’d per curiam, 333 F.2d 844 (3d Cir. 1964). 11 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Joan Subecz v. David M. Curtis
See e. g., United States v. Nuccio, 373 F.2d 168, 172 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 623 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lewis C. Butler
See also United States v. Nuccio, 373 F.2d 168 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 623 , and United States v. Armone, 363 F.2d 385 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Viscardi v. United States, 385 U.S. 957 , 87 S.Ct. 391 , 17 L.Ed.2d 303 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Miller
Compare United States v. McFarland, 371 F.2d 701 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1689 , 18 L.Ed.2d 624 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Swindlehurst
v.
American Fidelity Fire Insurance Co.
v.
American Fidelity Fire Insurance Co.
No. 1104.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 15, 1967.
H. Donald Bruce for petitioner. Fred Roland Allaben for American Fidelity Fire Insurance Co., and Stephen T. Roumell for Sales, respondents.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1) · E.D. New York (1)
Sup. Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied.