green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Tp. of West Orange v. 769 Association, LLC
See State v. Buck, 94 N.J.Super. 84, 88 , 226 A. 2d 840 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 49 N.J. 359 , 230 A. 2d 393 (1967), appeal dismissed, 389 U.S. 571 , 88 S.Ct. 693 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 780 (1968) (acquiring entire tract rather than leaving small borderline strip and avoiding landlocking property did not defeat condemnation); Julius L.
cited
Cited "see"
Alvin Turner v. The Littleton-Lake Gaston School District
See Poindexter v. Louisiana Financial Assistance Commission, 275 F.Supp. 833 (E.D.La.1967), aff'd per curiam, 389 U.S. 571 , 88 S.Ct. 693 , 19 L.Ed.2d 780 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Turner v. Littleton-Lake Gaston School District
See Poindexter v. Louisiana Financial Assistance Commission, 275 F.Supp. 833 (E.D.La.1967), aff’d per curiam, 389 U.S. 571 , 88 S.Ct. 693 , 19 L.Ed.2d 780 (1968).
examined
Cited "see"
Smuck v. Hobson
(3×)
See United States v. Blue Chip Stamp Co., 272 F.Supp. 432, 435-436 (C.D.Calif. 1967) (collecting cases), aff’d, Thrifty Shoppers Scrip Co. v. U. S., 389 U.S. 580 , 88 S.Ct. 693 , 19 L.Ed.2d 781 (1968). .
examined
Cited "see"
Carl C. Smuck, a Member of the Board of Education of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. Hobson, Carl F. Hansen, Superintendent of Schools of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. Hobson
(3×)
See Shapiro, supra note 9, at 729-731; Kaplan, supra note 10, at 403-407 17 Cf. Shapiro, supra note 9, at 740, 752-756 18 In providing for the first time for an elected school board in the District, Congress has recognized that 'the education of their children is a municipal matter of primary and personal concern to the citizens of a community.' District of Columbia Elected Board of Education Act 2, 82 Stat. 101 (1968) 19 See Pellegrino v. Nesbit, 203 F.2d 463, 467 , 37 A.L.R.2d 1296 (9th Cir. 1953) 20 Textile Workers Union, etc. v. Allendale Co., 96 U.S.App.d.C. 401, 403, 226 F.2d 765, 767 (1…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Guedry v. Marino
See also Poindexter v. Louisiana Financial Assistance Commission, 258 F.Supp. 158, 165-66 (E.D.La.1966), aff 'd, 389 U.S. 571 , 88 S.Ct. 693 , 19 L.Ed.2d 780 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McKenna v. Reilly
See also Poindexter v. Louisiana Financial Assistance Commission, 275 F.Supp. 833, 835, 854 (D.La. 1967), affirmed, 389 U.S. 571 , 88 S.Ct. 693 , 19 L.Ed.2d 780 (1968). 8 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
David Johnson v. San Francisco Unified School District, (Two Cases). David Johnson v. San Francisco Unified School District, Robert G. Nelson, Intervenors-Appellants (Two Cases). David Johnson v. San Francisco Unified School District, and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Guey Heung Lee, in Intervention-Appellants. David Johnson v. San Francisco Unified School District
(3×)
See, e.g., United States v. Blue Chip Stamp Co., 272 F.Supp. 432, 435-436 (C.D.Cal.1967), aff'd, Thrifty Shoppers Scrip Co. v. United States, 389 U.S. 580 , 88 S.Ct. 693 , 19 L.Ed.2d 781 (1968); Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education, 427 F.2d 1352 , 1354 n. 3 (9th Cir. 1970), and cases cited therein.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. San Francisco Unified School District
(3×)
See, e. g., United States v. Blue Chip Stamp Co., 272 F.Supp. 432, 435-436 (C.D.Cal.1967), aff’d, Thrifty Shoppers Scrip Co. v. United States, 389 U.S. 580 , 88 S.Ct. 693 , 19 L.Ed.2d 781 (1968); Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education, 427 F.2d 1352 , 1354 n. 3 (9th Cir. 1970), and cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Alabama State Teachers Ass'n v. Lowdes County Board of Education
Compare generally Poindexter v. Louisiana Financial Assistance Commission, 275 F.Supp. 833 (E.D.La.1967), aff’d 389 U.S. 571 , 88 S.Ct. 693 , 19 L.Ed.2d 780 (1968). 11 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
THRIFTY SHOPPERS SCRIP CO.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
820, October Term, 1967.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 15, 1968.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 99 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.
David B. Gold for appellant in No. 820. Howard M. Downs for appellants in No. 849.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Daniel M. Friedman for the United States in both cases. William W. Alsup, Allyn O. Kreps, Arnold M. Lerman, William E. Mussman and Gordon Johnson for appellees Blue Chip Stamp Co. et al. in both cases.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
[*] Together with No. 849, Twyman, dba Bill's Union Station, et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.