green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Holly Farms Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. Cal-Maine Farms, Inc., 998 F.2d 1336, 1339 (5th Cir.1993) (citing Wirtz v. Ti Ti Peat Humus Co., 373 F.2d 209, 212 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 834 , 88 S.Ct. 37 , 19 L.Ed.2d 94 (1967)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nos. 93-1710, 93-1882
See NLRB v. Cal-Maine Farms, Inc., 998 F.2d 1336, 1339 (5th Cir.1993) (citing Wirtz v. Ti Ti Peat Humus Co., 373 F.2d 209, 212 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 834 , 88 S.Ct. 37 , 19 L.Ed.2d 94 (1967)). 44 The term "agricultural laborer" has the meaning specified in Sec. 3(f) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Angelo v. Sidco, Inc. (In Re Sidco, Inc.)
See Chugach Electric Ass’n v. United States, 370 F.2d 441 (9th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 820 , 88 S.Ct. 40 , 19 L.Ed.2d 71 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bankers Trust Company v. Publicker Industries, Inc.
See Minichiello v. Royal Business Funds Corp., 18 N.Y.2d 521, 527 , 223 N.E.2d 793, 796 , 277 N.Y.S.2d 268, 272 (1966) (“It is possible for a finder to accomplish his service by making only two phone calls and, if the parties later conclude a deal, he is entitled to his commission.”), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 820 , 88 S.Ct. 41 , 19 L.Ed.2d 72 (1967). 7.
discussed
Cited "see"
Community Broadcasting of Boston, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
See Chugach Electric Ass’n v. United States District Court for the District of Alaska, 370 F.2d 441, 442 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 820 , 88 S.Ct. 40 , 19 L.Ed.2d 71 (1967); Cord v. Smith, 338 F.2d 516, 521-522 (9th Cir. 1964), clarified, 370 F.2d 418 (9th Cir. 1966). .
discussed
Cited "see"
James L. Johnson v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Company, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Plitt & Company, Stevedores, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
See Compania Anonima Venezolano de Navegacion v. Matthews, 371 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 820 , 88 S.Ct. 37 , 19 L.Ed.2d 71 (1967); Strachan Shipping Co. v. Alexander, 311 F.2d 385 (5th Cir. 1962); Reddick v. McAllister Lighterage Line, Inc., 258 F.2d 297 (2nd Cir. 1958); Gindville v. American-Hawaiian Steamship Co., 224 F.2d 746 (3rd Cir. 1955); Hopson v. M/V Karl Grammerstorf, 330 F.Supp. 1260 (E.D.La.1971). 9 Shipowner's third party claim against Stevedore is, however, more difficult.
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.
(2×)
See Compania Anonima Venezolano de Navegacion v. Matthews, 371 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 820 , 88 S.Ct. 37 , 19 L.Ed.2d 71 (1967); Strachan Shipping Co. v. Alexander, 311 F.2d 385 (5th Cir. 1962); Reddick v. McAllister Lighterage Line, Inc., 258 F.2d 297 (2nd Cir. 1958); Gindville v. American-Hawaiian Steamship Co., 224 F.2d 746 (3rd Cir. 1955); Hopson v. M/V Karl Grammerstorf, 330 F.Supp. 1260 (E.D.La.1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Quadra v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY & CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO
See Doff v. Brunswick Corporation, 372 F.2d 801, 805 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 820 , 88 S.Ct. 39 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 71 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
McFadden v. American Oil Co.
See Doff v. Brunswick Corp., 372 F. *55 2d 801, 805 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 820 (1967); Wagoner v. Mountain Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 29 F.R.D. 138 (D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones & Associates, Inc. v. District of Columbia
Phillips Co., Inc. v. Walling, 324 U.S. 490, 493 , 65 S.Ct. 807, 808 , 89 L.Ed. 1095 (1945); see also Wirtz v. Ti Ti Peat Humus Co., 373 F.2d 209, 212 (4th Cir.) (“[rjemedial social legislation of this nature is to be construed liberally in favor of the workers whom it was designed to protect, and any exemption from its terms must be narrowly construed”), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 834 , 88 S.Ct. 37 , 19 L.Ed.2d 94 (1967); Brennan v. Greene’s Propane Gas Serv., Inc., 479 F.2d 1027 , 1032 (5th Cir.1973) (applying rule that exemptions from FLSA are to be narrowly construed against the employer…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Vasser
See, e.g., Minichiello v. Royal Business Funds Corp., 18 N.Y.2d 521 , 277 N.Y.S.2d 268 , 223 N.E.2d 793 (N.Y.1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 820 , 88 S.Ct. 41 , 19 L.Ed.2d 72 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cartier v. Lear Siegler, Inc.
Furthermore, his causes of action based in quantum meruit and unjust enrichment are expressly abrogated by the statute (see, 1949 Report of NY Law Rev Comm [NY Legis Doc, 1949, No. 65 (G), p 615]; see also, Minichiello v Royal Business Funds Corp., 18 NY2d 521 , cert denied 389 US 820 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donovan v. Frezzo Brothers, Inc.
See also, Wirtz v. Ti Ti Peat Humus Co., 373 F.2d 209, 213 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 834 , 88 S.Ct. 37 , 19 L.Ed.2d 94 (1967); McComb v. Super-A Fertilizer Works, 165 F.2d 824, 828 (1st Cir. 1948).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donovan v. Frezzo Bros.
See also, Wirtz v. Ti Ti Peat Humus Co., 373 F.2d 209, 213 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 834 , 88 S.Ct. 37 , 19 L.Ed.2d 94 (1967); McComb v. Super-A Fertilizer Works, 165 F.2d 824, 828 (1st Cir. 1948).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Griffith v. Realty Executives, Inc. (In Re Griffith)
International U., D. 50, U.M.W. v. Mathiessen & Hegeler Zinc Co., 291 F.Supp. 578 (N.D.W.Va.1968); see Bolack v. Underwood, supra; see also Doff v. Brunswick Corporation, 372 F.2d 801 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 820 , 88 S.Ct. 39 , 19 L.Ed.2d 71 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
USM Corp. v. Marson Fastener Corp.
See also United States Plywood Corp. v. General Plywood Corp., 370 F.2d 500, 508 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 820 (1967); Future Plastics, Inc. v. Ware Shoal Plastics, Inc., 340 F.Supp. 1376, 1382 (D.S.C. 1972); Hamilton Mfg.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mathis v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.
See, e. g., Doff v. Brunswick Corp., 372 F.2d 801, 804 (9th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 820 , 88 S.Ct. 39 , 19 L.Ed.2d 71 (1967); Continental Aircraft Sales v. McDermott Bros.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hallinan
v.
Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco
v.
Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco
No. 116.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1967.
Vincent Hallmcm for petitioner., John F. Duff for respondent Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco, and Noel J. Dyer for respondent University of San Francisco.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.