green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
James A. Chute, Administrator of the Estate of James L. Chute v. United States of America, James A. Chute, Administrator of the Estate of James L. Chute v. United States
(h)ow much equipment the coast guard is to possess, and how much money it is to spend, measured, necessarily, by congressional appropriations, must be for the government's uncontrolled discretion
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Chute v. United States
ow much equipment the coast guard is to possess, and how much money it is to spend, measured, necessarily, by congressional appropriations, must be for the government's uncontrolled discretion
cited
Cited "see"
Hurd v. United States
See generally, United States v. Sandra & Dennis Fishing Corp., 372 F.2d 189, 199 (1st Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 836 , 88 S.Ct. 48 , 19 L.Ed.2d 98 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Whitney Steamship Company, as Owner of the M/v Sam Laud, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
See United States v. Sandra & Dennis Fishing Corp., 372 F.2d 189 , 195 n. 12 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 836 , 88 S.Ct. 48 , 19 L.Ed.2d 98 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Daley v. United States
Frank v. United States, 3 Cir., 1957, 250 F.2d 178 , cert. denied, 356 U.S. 962 , 78 S.Ct. 1000 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1069 ; see United States v. Sandra & Dennis Fishing Corp., 1 Cir., 1967, 372 F.2d 189, 195 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 836 , 88 S.Ct. 48 , 19 L.Ed.2d 98 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Gargiso
See United States v. Krol, 374 F.2d 776, 779 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 835 , 88 S.Ct. 46 , 19 L.Ed.2d 97 (1967). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw-Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Preston Products Company, Inc., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Preston Products Company, Inc., Preston Products Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union, Unitedautomobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw-Afl-Cio, Intervenor
(2×)
See N.L.R.B. v. Scherer & Sons, Inc., 5 Cir., 370 F.2d 12, 13 (1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 836 , 88 S.Ct. 46 , 19 L.Ed.2d 97 (1967); edward Fields, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., supra, 325 F.2d at 759-760 ; N.L.R.B. v. Elias Brothers Big Boy, Inc., 6 Cir., 325 F.2d 360, 363 (1963). 20 The company contends that the interrogation of employees by its attorney did not violate Section 8(a)(1) because such interrogations 'were absolutely essential to the preparation of Employer's case.' This court has noted that, because of the conflicting interests involved, a delicate balance must be achieved between the em…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jacob Dick v. United States
(2×)
See, eg., United States v. Sandra & Dennis Fishing Corp., 372 F.2d 189, 197 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 836 , 88 S.Ct. 48 , 19 L.Ed.2d 98 (1967).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gaspar v. United States
Compare United States v. Sandra & Dennis Fishing Corp., 372 F.2d 189, 197 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 836 , 88 S.Ct. 48 , 19 L.Ed.2d 98 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kapatos
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 166.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1967.
Frank A. Lopes for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (2)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.