green
Positive treatment
1.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lombard's, Inc. v. Prince Manufacturing, Inc. And Chesebrough-Pond's Inc.
Thus unlike Texaco, Inc. v. Borda, 383 F.2d 607, 609 (3d Cir.1967), where the witness was 71 years old and the events to be testified to had occurred 11 years earlier, Lombard’s “makes almost no attempt to show why the requested testimony must be perpetuated.” Ash v. Cort, 512 F.2d 909, 913 (3d Cir.1975) (cited in In re Eisenberg, 654 F.2d 1107, 1111 (5th Cir.1981) (Unit B)); see also Rose v. McNamara, 375 F.2d 924 , 925 & n. 2 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 856 , 88 S.Ct. 70 , 19 L.Ed.2d 121 (1967).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Meaamaile v. American Samoa
See also Rose v. McNamara, 375 F.2d 924 (D.C.Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 856 , 88 S.Ct. 70 , 19 L.Ed.2d 121 (1967); United States v. Seagraves, 100 F.Supp. 424 (D.Guam 1951).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rose
v.
McNamara, Secretary of Defense
v.
McNamara, Secretary of Defense
No. 272.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1967.
Warren E. Magee, Hans A. Nathan, William H. Quasha, Howard B. McClellan, Stuart H. Robeson and Roger E. Brooks for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley and Morton Hollander for respondent.
Consideration, Douglas, Granted, Should, Took.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.