green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd.
See id. at 893 (quoting McBeath v. Inter-American Citizens for Decency Committee, 374 F.2d 359 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 389 U.S. 896 , 88 S.Ct. 216 , 19 L.Ed.2d 214 (1967)) (“[W]here the factual and jurisdictional issues are completely intermeshed the jurisdictional issues should be referred to the merits, for it is impossible to decide the one without the other.”) The requirement that the First Circuit reaffirmed in its decision in Nippon, that the government prove “intended” as well as “substantial effects” on interstate commerce, reflects the special concerns attendant to prosec…
cited
Cited "see"
Michelson v. Commissioner
See Mirro-Dynamics Corp. v. United States , 374 F.2d (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 896 (1967) .
cited
Cited "see"
Kozikowski v. Commissioner
See Mirro-Dynamics Corp. v. United States, 374 F.2d 14 (9th Cir. 1967) , cert. denied 389 U.S. 896 (1967) .
cited
Cited "see"
Huebschman v. Commissioner
See Mirro-Dynamics Corporation v. United States, 374 F.2d 14 (9th Cir. 1967) , cert. denied 389 U.S. 896 (1967) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Melancon v. McKeithen
See, e. g., Parsons v. Gulf, 1967, 389 U.S. 896 , 88 S.Ct. 215 , 19 L.Ed.2d 213 ; Jones v. Aetna, 1967, 389 U.S. 990 , 88 S.Ct. 471 , 19 L.Ed.2d 482 ; Mayes v. McKeithen, 1969, 396 U.S. 868 , 90 S.Ct. 108 , 24 L.Ed.2d 121 ; Marshall v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co., 1968, 393 U.S. 883 , 89 S.Ct. 189 , 21 L.Ed.2d 158 ; King v. Vico, 1966, 385 U.S. 841 , 87 S.Ct. 90 , 17 L.Ed.2d 73 ; Broussard v. State Farm, 1967, 386 U.S. 909 , 87 S.Ct. 885 , 17 L.Ed.2d 783 ; Sule v. Mo. Pac.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carafas
v.
LaVallee, Warden
v.
LaVallee, Warden
No. 71.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1967.
James J. Cally for petitioner., Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Barry Mahoney, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.