green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,447 S. William Green v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc.
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
But see Braasch v. Goldschmidt, 41 Del.Ch. 519, 524 , 199 A.2d 760 , 764 (Ch.1964) 2 See note 1 supra 3 Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 634 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967); Popkin v. Bishop, 464 F.2d 714 , 718 n. 8 (2d Cir. 1972) 4 Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., supra, at 635 5 See Stauffer v. Standard Brands Inc., 40 Del.Ch. 202 , 178 A.2d 311, 314 (Ch.1962), aff'd, 41 Del.Ch. 7 , 187 A.2d 78 (Sup.Ct.1962) 6 See note 1 supra 7 Of course, the separate position of Morgan Stanley & Co. was not even discussed by Judge Brieant in his opin…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lee v. Regal Cruises, Ltd.
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 636-37 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967) (affirming denial of leave to amend where facts known to plaintiff from outset and plaintiff awaiting outcome of motion to dismiss before seeking leave).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beale v. Edgemark Financial Corp.
See Ray v. Karris, 780 F.2d 636 , 640 fn. 1 (7th Cir.1985) citing Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 634 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967). 1 For purposes of this motion for class certification, Beale’s standing as a “forced seller” has been unchallenged by Defendants and this fact alone means that at least part of Beale’s claim is typical of those of other class members.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaempfer v. Brown (In re B & W Management, Inc.)
See Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co., 380 F.2d 570, 576 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 461 (1967); see also Parrish v. Board of Commissioners of Alabama State Bar, 524 F.2d 98, 100 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 944 , 96 S.Ct. 1685 , 48 L.Ed.2d 188 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Seymour Vigman
See Shivers v. Amerco, 670 F.2d at 830 (discussing Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967)).
cited
Cited "see"
Koppel v. Wien
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Hershfang v. Knotter
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 476 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bolton v. Gramlich
McDaniel v. Dudley, 404 U.S. 858 , 92 S.Ct. 109 , 30 L.Ed.2d 101 (1971); see Vine v. Beneficial Finance Corp., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
L. D. Schreiber Cheese Co. v. Clearfield Cheese Co.
In determining when the granting of an amendment would be potentially prejudicial courts are frequently guided by the following considerations: the good faith of the party seeking the amendment; see Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (2d Cir. 1967); Danzy v. Johnson, 417 F.Supp. 426 , aff’med, 3 Cir., 582 F.2d 1273 (E.D.Pa.1976), the extent to which there has been an undue delay in proffering the amendment; see, e. g., Izaak Walton League of America v. St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Niederhoffer, Cross & Zeckhauser, Inc. v. Telstat Systems Inc.
Corp., 382 U.S. 172 , 86 S.Ct. 347 , 15 L.Ed.2d 247 (1965); Escalera v. New York City Housing Authority, 425 F.2d 853, 857 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 853 , 91 S.Ct. 54 , 27 L.Ed.2d 91 (1970); see Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Rothstein v. Seidman & Seidman
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 634 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Molasky v. Garfinkle
See Iroquois Industries, Inc. v. Syracuse China Corp., 417 F.2d 963, 969 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 909 , 90 S.Ct. 2199 , 26 L.Ed.2d 561 (1970). . 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967) ; see Dudley v. Southeastern Factor & Finance Corp., 446 F.2d 303 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 858 , 92 S.Ct. 109 , 30 L.Ed.2d 101 (1971) ; Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787, 798 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S. Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970) ; Feldberg v. O’Connell, 338 F.Supp. 744 (D.Mass.1972). . 375 F…
discussed
Cited "see"
Goodall v. Columbia Ventures, Inc.
See, Vine v. Beneficial Finance Corp., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967) ; Mutual Shares Corp. v. Genesco, Inc., 384 F.2d 540 (2d Cir. 1967) ; Crane v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970). 19 .
cited
Cited "see"
Dopp v. Franklin National Bank
Corp., 382 U.S. 172 , 86 S.Ct. 347 , 15 L.Ed.2d 247 (1965); see Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 - 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
John S. Kirby, D/B/A Quik-Chek of Indiana and Quik-Chek, Inc. v. P. R. Mallory & Co., Inc.
Accord, Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., Inc., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1967), cert, den., 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967); Fowler v. Sponge Products Corp., 246 F.2d 223 (1st Cir. 1957); Eisenmann v. Gould-National Batteries, Inc., 169 F.Supp. 862 (E.D.Pa.1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Marine Midland Grace Trust Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 630-657 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Landy v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir. 1965), cert, denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967) 1 "It has been held that an appellate court cannot know judicially what transpired in the cause throughout its long history.
cited
Cited "see"
Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corporation, Howard Piper, Thomas F. Piper, William T. Piper, Jr., Bangor Punta Corporation, Nicolas M. Salgo, David M. Wallace, the First Boston Corporation, Paul L. Miller and Nicholas H. Bayard, Bangor Punta Corporation v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc., Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. Bangor Punta Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Appellant
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 (1967). 131 We have held that reliance is established in a Rule 10b-5 action if the "'misrepresentation is a substantial factor in determining the course of conduct which results in [the recipient's] loss"'.
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,549 Irwin Popkin v. Warner B. Bishop
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Basch v. Talley Industries, Inc.
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 637-638 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 Insofar as plaintiffs seek rescission of the merger, which may be a justification for allowing a derivative suit, they are asking for relief which is totally impractical in this case.
cited
Cited "see"
Knauff v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, 2 Cir., 374 F.2d 627, 634 , cert. denied 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 .
cited
Cited "see"
Knauff v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.
See Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, 2 Cir., 374 F.2d 627, 634 , cert. denied 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Briarpatch Ltd., LP v. Geisler Roberdeau, Inc.
See, e.g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 637 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Endicott Johnson Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney, 489 U.S. at 179 , 109 S.Ct. at 993 ; see, e.g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 632 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967) (applying Thompson where appellant filed untimely postjudgment motion, that, if timely, would have tolled the running of the 30-day period, because district court then held the untimely motion sub judice for two weeks, until the 30-day period for an appeal had expired).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Town of New Windsor v. Tesa Tuck, Inc.
See, e.g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 637 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d *677 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dower v. Mosser Industries, Inc.
See e. g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 633-36 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967); Vaiente v. PepsiCo, Inc., 454 F.Supp. 1228, 1236-37 (D.Del.1978); 2 A. Bromberg Securities Law; Fraud § 6.3 at 122.17 (1977). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores
(2×)
See, e. g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F. 2d 627, 636 (CA2), cert. denied, 389 U. S. 970 (1967); Iroquois Industries, Inc. v. Syracuse China Corp., 417 F. 2d, at 967 ; Rekant v. Desser, 425 F. 2d 872, 879 (CA5 1970); GAF Corp. v. Milstein, 453 F. 2d 709, 721 (CA2 1971), cert. denied, 406 U. S. 910 (1972); Drachman v. Harvey, 453 F. 2d 722, 736, 738 (CA2 1972) (en bane); Mount Clemens Industries.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corporation
(2×)
See also Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967). 18 Thus, the complaint completes the showing necessary to state a claim under Rule 10b-5.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,405 Joe L. Smallwood v. Pearl Brewing Company, Southdown, Inc., Zapata Norness, Inc., Albert J. Rangeand D. Doyle Mize
See also Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 2 Cir. 1967, 374 F.2d 627, 637 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,125 Sue Ellen Baker James v. Gerber Products Company, the Old State Bank of Fremont
See, e. g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (standing granted since shareholder was forced to sell his shares at a later time); A. T.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kluger v. White
See, e.g., Bencomo v. Bencomo, 200 So.2d 171 (Fla.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 466 , 19 L.Ed.2d (1967); Shiver v. Sessions, 80 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1955); Sullivan v. Sessions, 80 So.2d 706 (Fla. 1955); Corren v. Corren, 47 So.2d 774 (Fla. 1950). [7] 160 Fla. 736 , 36 So.2d 419 (1948). [8] Section 320.59, Florida Statutes, 1971 repealed by § 1, ch. 72-1, Laws of Florida. [9] 149 Fla. 334 , 5 So.2d 867 (1942). [10] Chapter 440, Florida Statutes, 1971, F.S.A. [11] See, e.g., Mullarkey v. Florida Feed Mills, Inc., 268 So.2d 363 (Fla. 1972); Carter v. Sims Crane Service, Inc., 198 So.2d…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Green v. Wolf Corp.
See, e. g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627, 637 (2d Cir.) cert, denied 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,474 Morton Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc. And Ellias C. Hoppenfeld, Blair & Co., Granbery Marache Incorporated, and Third-Party v. Paul Wiener, Third-Party
See also Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., Inc., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967); Mutual Shares Corp. v. Genesco Inc., 384 F.2d 540, 544 (2d Cir. 1967); Barnett v. Anaconda Co., 238 F.Supp. 766, 776 (S.D.N.Y.1965); 6 Loss, supra, at 3880-3881. 54 Appellants also argue that the court distorted the question of causation by ruling that the schedule which the parties agreed would govern the amount of compensatory damages suffered assuming liability was proven, estopped defendants from contending that Globus (and perhaps others) suffered …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bokat v. Getty Oil Company
See, also, Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, 374 F.2d 627 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 460 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Theodoropoulos v. Thompson-Starrett Company
Co., 341 F.2d 229, 232 (2 Cir. 1965); see also Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2 Cir.), cert. denied 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 (1967); Terrasi v. South Atlantic Lines, Inc., 226 F.2d 823, 824 (2 Cir. 1955), cert. denied 350 U.S. 988 , 76 S.Ct. 475 , 100 L.Ed. 855 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.
See also Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., Inc., 374 F.2d 627, 635 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967); Mutual Shares Corp. v. Genesco Inc., 384 F.2d 540, 544 (2d Cir. 1967); Barnett v. Anaconda Co., 238 F.Supp. 766, 776 (S.D.N.Y. 1965); 6 Loss, supra, at 3880-3881.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,413 John D. Condon v. Coyn Richardson
See also Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 374 F.2d 627 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 (1967); cf. Ruckle v. Roto American Corp., 339 F.2d 24 (2nd Cir. 1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neville v. Delta Insurance
See, e. g., Vine v. Beneficial Finance Co., 252 F.Supp. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 1966) aff’d in part, rev’d in part 374 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 970 , 88 S.Ct. 463 , 19 L.Ed.2d 460 ; 3A Moore’s ¶ 23.13.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Coleman
v.
Coleman
No. 630.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1967.
Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Robert S. Rifkind, Roger P. Marquis and George R. Hyde for the United States et al., George W. Nilsson, W. Howard Gray, Howard A. Twitty and Edward A. McCabe for respondents.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.