Granello v. United States, 393 U.S. 1095 (1969). · Go Syfert
Granello v. United States, 393 U.S. 1095 (1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Ho Yee Bon (nysd, 1974-06-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ho Yee Bon
S.D.N.Y. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Soyka, 394 F.2d 443, 454 (2d Cir. 1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1095 , 89 S.Ct. 883 , 21 L.Ed.2d 785 (1969); Raffone v. Adams, supra at 866-867 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Del Porte
S.D.N.Y. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Soyka, 394 F.2d 443 (2d Cir. rehearing in banc 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1095 , 89 S.Ct. 883 , 21 L.Ed.2d 785 (1969).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Romero
S.D.N.Y. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Soyka, 394 F.2d 443, 453-454 (2 Cir. in banc 1968) (arrest in an apartment), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1095 , 89 S.Ct. 883 , 21 L.Ed.2d 785 (1969).
cited Cited "see" McKoy v. Commonwealth
Va. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Soyka, 394 F.2d 443 , rev'd on rehearing, 394 F.2d 452 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1095 , 89 S. Ct. 883 , 21 L.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Joel Lozaw (2×)
2d Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Soyka, 394 F.2d 443, 452-454 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1095 , 89 S.Ct. 883 , 21 L.Ed.2d 785 (1969) (opinion on rehearing en banc).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Granello, aka Burns
v.
United States
No. 927.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1969.
393 U.S. 1095
Irving Anolik and Michael P. Direnzo for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Joseph M. Howard, and John P. Burke for the United States.
Brennan, Consideration, Took.
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.