green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Pressley v. State
See Biddy v. Diamond, 516 F.2d 118 (5th Cir.1975), ce rt. denied 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976); People v. Schenk, 24 Cal.App.3d 233 , 101 Cal.Rptr. 75 , (Cal.Ct.App.1972); Nettles v. State, 248 So.2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971); but see Maguire v. United States, 396 F.2d 327 (9th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1099 , 89 S.Ct. 897 , 21 L.Ed.2d 792 (1969); State v. Gallagher, 36 Ohio App.2d 29 , 301 N.E.2d 888 (1973), reinstated, 46 Ohio St.2d 225 , 348 N.E.2d 336 (1976).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gigante
the burden of establishing an effective withdrawal from a conspiracy rests upon the defendant" and once proved it entitles him to an acquittal "as a matter of law
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Berger
See United States v. Goldberg, 401 F.2d 644, 648 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1099 , 89 S.Ct. 895 , 21 L.Ed.2d 790 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roland Markeith Johnson, United States of America v. Steven Lamont Lewis
(2×)
See United States v. Goldberg, 401 F.2d 644, 647-48 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1099 , 89 S.Ct. 895 , 21 L.Ed.2d 790 , and 394 U.S. 932 , 89 S.Ct. 1202 , 22 L.Ed.2d 461 (1969) (admission of charts into evidence not abuse of discretion where district court instructed jury that charts were not "independent" evidence and, instead, were only representations of other admitted evidence). 10 37 In this case, applying the principles discussed above, we find that the district court did not err in admitting the summary chart.
discussed
Cited "see"
Philip K. Sadowski v. Jack McCormick Warden, Montana State Prison
See Maguire v. United States, 396 F.2d 327, 331 (9th Cir.1968) (second Miranda warning by police officer unnecessary where different officer gave Miranda warning to defendant three days earlier), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1099 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parnell Seaton v. John Jabe
See Maguire v. United States, 396 F.2d 327, 330 (9th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1099 (1969). 67 As also stated above, the difficulty in locating the sixth alleged alibi witness stemmed from petitioner's refusal to cooperate with his appointed counsel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clarence A. Clarke, United States of America v. Israel Pink, United States of America v. Sandra Walker Rodney
See United States v. Shackleford, 738 F.2d 776, 779 (7th Cir.1984) 4 Evidence is considered necessary and admissible where it is an essential part of the crimes at trial, see United States v. Masters, 622 F.2d 83, 86 (4th Cir.1980), where it "furnishes part of the context of the crime," United States v. Smith, 446 F.2d 200, 204 (4th Cir.1971), or where it is necessary to a "full presentation" of the case, United States v. Weems, 398 F.2d 274, 275 (4th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1099 (1969)
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lewis F. Shelton, James Darrough, John Derry, Donald Burks, and Carl Bledsoe
See Maguire v. United States, 396 F.2d 327, 331 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1099 , 89 S.Ct. 897 , 21 L.Ed.2d 792 (1969). 21 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. United States Gypsum Company
See also United States v. Goldberg, 401 F.2d 644, 648-49 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1099 , 89 S.Ct. 895 , 21 L.Ed.2d 790 (separate appeal), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
See also United States v. Goldberg, 401 F.2d 644, 648-49 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1099 , 89 S.Ct. 895 , 21 L.Ed.2d 790 (separate appeal), cert. denied sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Weems
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1010.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1969.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.