green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
See Berger v. United States, 255 U.S. 22, 31 , 41 S.Ct. 230, 232 , 65 L.Ed. 481 (1921) (“bias or prejudice which can be urged against a judge must be based upon something other than rulings in the case” and the disqualification statute “was never intended ... to enable a .discontented litigant to oust a judge because of adverse rulings”); accord Hanger v. United States, 398 F.2d 91, 101 (8th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 995 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Antonio Cipollone, Individually, and as the of the Estate of Rose D. Cipollone, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Liggett Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Philip Morris Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation, and Loew's Theatres, Inc., a New York Corporation, Defendants-Petitioners. Susan Haines, as Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and of the Estate of Peter F. Rossi, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Liggett Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Loew's Theatres, Inc., a New York Corporation, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a New Jersey Corporation, Philip Morris Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation, and the Tobacco Institute, Defendants- Liggett Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Philip Morris Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a New Jersey Corporation, the Tobacco Institute, and Loew's Theatres, Inc., a New York Corporation v. Honorable H. Lee Sarokin, United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey, Nominal
See Berger v. United States, 255 U.S. 22, 31 , 41 S.Ct. 230, 232 , 65 L.Ed. 481 (1921) ("bias or prejudice which can be urged against a judge must be based upon something other than rulings in the case" and the disqualification statute "was never intended ... to enable a discontented litigant to oust a judge because of adverse rulings"); accord Hanger v. United States, 398 F.2d 91, 101 (8th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 995 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969). 67 In support of their contention that Judge Sarokin's ruling demonstrates hostility to the tobacco industry, petitioners point…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Tyler
See Hanger v. United States, 398 F.2d 91, 101 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 995 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Flauaus
See Hanger v. United States, 398 F.2d 91 (8th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 995 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969), rehearing denied, 395 U.S. 971 , 89 S.Ct. 2106 , 23 L.Ed.2d 761 (1969), which upheld the validity of a search warrant, based on Steele v. United States, supra, which named an entire apartment building although the intent was to search a single apartment and which contained an erroneous address.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McCaskey
See, e.g., Hangar v. United States, 398 F.2d 91 (8th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 995 , 22 L.E.2d 124 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Davidson
(2×)
Scott v. United States, 354 F.2d 292, 296 , 173 Ct.Cl. 650 (1965); see also Gefen v. United States, 400 F.2d 476, 482 (5th Cir.1968), certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 990 , 22 L.Ed.2d 123 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taubman v. United States
(2×)
Scott v. United States, 354 F.2d 292 , 296, 173 Ct.Cl. 650 (1965); see also Gefen v. United States, 400 F.2d 476, 482 (5th Cir. 1968), certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 990 , 22 L.Ed.2d *1138 123.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Franchise Finance & Management Co.
(2×)
See also Gefen v. United States, 400 F.2d 476 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 990 , 22 L.Ed.2d 123 (1969), citing Damsky v. Zavatt, 289 F.2d 46 (2nd Cir. 1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Esters
See, e.g., Hanger v. United States, 398 F.2d *219 91 (8th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 995 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969); United States v. Goodman, 312 F.Supp. 556 (N.D.Ind.1970); United States v. Pisano, 191 F.Supp. 861 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-Party
(2×)
Liability attaches to those with power and responsibility within the corporate structure for seeing that the taxes withheld from various sources are remitted to the Government Scott v. United States, 354 F.2d 292, 296 , 173 Ct.Cl. 650 (1965); see also Gefen v. United States, 400 F.2d 476, 482 (5th Cir.1968), certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 990 , 22 L.Ed.2d 123 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gefen
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 851.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1969.
Joseph M. Glickstein, Jr., for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Loring W. Post, and Robert I. Waxman for the United States.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.