Acree v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, 393 U.S. 852 (1968). · Go Syfert
Acree v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, 393 U.S. 852 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“non-merits judgment of this type, whether its abating effect be termed direct estoppel ... or simply res judicata, is conclusive as to matters actually adjudged”
65 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: City Capital Resources, Inc. v. White (wvsd, 1998-12-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) City Capital Resources, Inc. v. White
S.D.W. Va · 1998 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
non-merits judgment of this type, whether its abating effect be termed direct estoppel ... or simply res judicata, is conclusive as to matters actually adjudged
discussed Cited "see" Elijah W. Ratcliff, Individually and Elijah W. Ratcliff v. Polk County Title, Inc., Ronald P. Boyce and E.L. McClendon, Jr.
Tex. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Acree v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, 390 F.2d 199, 202-03 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 852 , 89 S.Ct. 88 , 21 L.Ed.2d 122 (1968) (The dismissal of a federal suit is conclusive as to all matters that were actually adjudged in determining that the court lacked jurisdiction.).
discussed Cited "see" Robert J. Meza v. General Battery Corporation and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
5th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Acree v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n, 390 F.2d 199, 202 (5th Cir.) (union held “proper party” to bring claims on behalf of individual members), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 852 , 89 S.Ct. 88 , 21 L.Ed.2d 122 (1968); Panza v. Armco Steel Corp., 316 F.2d 69, 70 (3d Cir.) (union was “duly constituted representative of its members”), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 897 , 84 S.Ct. 174 , 11 L.Ed.2d 125 (1963).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Roscoe Emory Dean, Jr., in Re United States of America
11th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Aeree v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n, 390 F.2d 199, 203 (5th Cir.) (prior decision on jurisdictional grounds precludes further litigation of jurisdictional issue), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 852 , 89 S.Ct. 88 , 21 L.Ed.2d 122 (1968).
discussed Cited "see" Mashpee Tribe v. Watt
D. Mass. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Lawlor v. National Screen Service, 349 U.S. 322 , 329 n.19, 75 S.Ct. 865 , 869 n.19, 99 L.Ed. 1122 (1955) (privies are “those whose interests are represented by a party to the action”), General Foods v. Mass. Dept. of Public Health, 648 F.2d 784, 787 (1st Cir., 1981) (“a person who is not a party to an action but who expressly or impliedly gives a party authority to represent him may be bound by the rule of res judicata as though he were a party”), Acree v. Airline Pilots Association, 390 F.2d 199, 202-203 (5th Cir., 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 852 , 89 S.Ct. 88 , 21 L.Ed.2d 122…
discussed Cited "see" Annapolis Urban Renewal Authority v. Interlink, Inc.
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Acree v. Air Line Pilots Assoc., 390 F.2d 199, 203 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 852 (1968); Miller v. Saxbe, 396 F. Supp. 1260, 1261 (D.D.C. 1975); Luker v. Nelson, 341 F. Supp. 111, 114-15 (N.D.
cited Cited "see" Burns v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board
5th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Acree v. Air Line Pilots Association, 5 Cir., 1968, 390 F.2d 199, 201 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 852 , 89 S.Ct. 88 , 21 L.Ed.2d 122 .
cited Cited "see" Burns v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board
5th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Acree v. Air Line Pilots Association, 5 Cir., 1968, 390 F.2d 199, 201 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 852 , 89 S.Ct. 88 , 21 L.Ed.2d 122 .
discussed Cited "see" In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions. Joseph B. Kauffman (2×)
1st Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Acree v. Air Line Pilots Assoc., 5 Cir., 1968, 390 F.2d 199, 203 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 852 , 89 S.Ct. 88 , 21 L.Ed.2d 122 ; Estevez v. Nabers, 5 Cir., 1955, 219 F.2d 321, 324 ; 1B Moore's Federal Practice p .405 .
discussed Cited "see" New Orleans Stevedoring Company, a Division of James J. Flanagan Shipping Corporation v. The United States
5th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Acree v. Air Line Pilots Association, 5 Cir., 1968, 390 F.2d 199 , cert. den. 393 U.S. 852 , 89 S.Ct. 88 , 21 L.Ed.2d 122 ; United States v. Eastport Steamship Corporation, 2 Cir., 1958, 255 F.2d 795 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." American Postal Workers Union Columbus Area Local Afl-Cio v. United States Postal Service
6th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Acree v. Airline Pilots Ass’n, 390 F.2d 199, 202 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 852 , 89 S.Ct. 88 , 21 L.Ed.2d 122 (1968); International Union, UAW v. Acme Precision Products, Inc., 515 F.Supp. 537, 540 (D.C.Mich.1981); Sumaron v. Int’l Longshoreman’s Union, *319 450 F.Supp. 1026, 1029 (C.D.Cal.1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Notey v. Hynes
E.D.N.Y · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Acree v. AirLine Pilots Association, 390 F.2d 199 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 852 , 89 S.Ct. 88 , 21 L.Ed.2d 122 (1968); Jefferson School of Social Science v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 2 , 331 F.2d 76 (1963); Nichols v. Alker, 126 F.Supp. 679 (E.D.N.Y.1954), aff’d, 231 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 829 , 77 S.Ct. 42 , 1 L.Ed.2d 51 (1956); 1B Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 0.411[6], [12], 3 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Acree
v.
Air Line Pilots Assn.
No. 94.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1968.
393 U.S. 852
Thomas L. Garter, Jr., and Warren S. Gritzmacher for petitioners., Samuel J. Cohen for Air Line Pilots Assn., and W. Glen Harlan, E. Smythe Gam-brell, and Charles A. Moye, Jr., for Eastern Air Lines, Inc., respondents.
Consideration, Took.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: S.D. West Virginia (1)

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.