green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Service Employees International Union, Local No. 36, Afl-Cio v. Office Center Services, Inc.
But see Newark Stereotypers’ Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 397 F.2d 594 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 378 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968) (substantive provisions of the Act applied in a § 301 LMRA suit); Philadelphia Dress Joint Bd. v. Rosinsky, 229 F.2d 438 (3d Cir. 1956) (denial of motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction affirmed on the basis of Tenney).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cayenne
“When a sentence has been imposed for which there is no authority in law, the trial court has the power and duty to correct the erroneous sentence, when the error is discovered.” McNutt v. Delmore, 47 Wn.2d 563, 565 , 288 P.2d 848 (1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 1002 (1956); see State v. Palmer, 73 Wn.2d 462, 475 , 438 P.2d 876 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 (1968); see also Heflin v. United States, 358 U.S. 415, 418 , 79 S. Ct. 451 , 3 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cayenne
"When a sentence has been imposed for which there is no authority in law, the trial court has the power and duty to correct the erroneous sentence, when the error is discovered." McNutt v. Delmore, 47 Wash.2d 563, 565 , 288 P.2d 848 (1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 1002 , 76 S.Ct. 550 , 100 L.Ed. 866 (1956); see State v. Palmer, 73 Wash.2d 462, 475 , 438 P.2d 876 , cert. denied sub nom., Phillips v. Washington, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 381 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968); see also Heflin v. United States, 358 U.S. 415, 418 , 79 S.Ct. 451 , 3 L.Ed.2d 407 (1959). ¶ 6 The principles governing the resolutio…
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Bridgeport v. Kasper Group, Inc.
(2×)
See Newark Stereotypers’ Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 397 F.2d 594, 599 (3d Cir.) (declining to vacate arbitrator’s award because “it cannot be said as a matter of law that [the excluded evidence] was decisive or that its exclusion was seriously harmful in the light of the other evidence in the case” [emphasis added]), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S. Ct. 378 , 21 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Midamerican Energy Co. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 499
See Newark Stereotypers’ Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 397 F.2d 594, 599 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 378 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968) (fraud must deprive party of fair hearing).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lightning Lube, Inc. Laser Lube, a New Jersey Corporation v. Witco Corporation Avis Service, Inc. Avis Lube, Inc. Avis Enterprises, Inc., Defendants/third Party v. Ralph Venuto, Individually and D/B/A Laser Lube, Lightning Lube, and Automotive Management Systems Carol Venuto, His Wife, Individually Automotive Management Systems, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Third Party Witco Corporation, Lightning Lube, Inc. Laser Lube, a New Jersey Corporation v. Witco Corporation Avis Service, Inc. Avis Lube, Inc. Avis Enterprises, Inc., Defendants/third Party v. Ralph Venuto, Individually and D/B/A Laser Lube, Lightning Lube, and Automotive Management Systems Carol Venuto, His Wife, Individually Automotive Management Systems, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Third Party Lightning Lube, Inc., T/a Laser Lube
See Newark Stereotypers' Union v. Newark Morning Ledger, 397 F.2d 594, 599 (3d Cir.1968) (recognizing that "an attempt by a litigant to persuade a witness not to testify is properly admissible against him as an indication of his own belief that his claim is weak or unfounded or false"), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 378 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1969). 85 Witco now argues, as it did before the district court in seeking a new trial, that the district court should have granted a mistrial, or at the very least permitted Witco to call Kramer as a witness and examine the three witnesses as to their…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.
See Newark Stereotypers’ Union v. Newark Morning Ledger, 397 F.2d 594, 599 (3d Cir.1968) (recognizing that “an attempt by a litigant to persuade a witness not to testify is properly admissible against him as an indication of his own belief that his claim is weak or unfounded or false”), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 378 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Oil Corp. v. Libyan Sun Oil Co.
See Newark Stereotypers’ Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 397 F.2d 594, 600 (3d Cir.) (perjury does not justify vacation of an arbitral award if it relates to “an issue remote from the question to be decided”), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 378 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968); cf. Dogherra, 679 F.2d at 1297 . a.
discussed
Cited "see"
Apex Fountain Sales, Inc. v. Kleinfeld, Ernie, Flo Aire, Inc., Kearney, Jr., Ralph, Kearney, Michael, Ralph Kearney & Son, Inc.
See Newark Stereotypers’ Union v. *1095 Newark Morning Ledger, 397 F.2d 594, 599 (3d Cir.) (exclusion of relevant evidence is ground for reversal only if it “so affects the rights of a party ... that he was deprived of a fair hearing”), cert. denied 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 378 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968); Nat’l Post Office Mailhandlers, 751 F.2d at 841 (“standard for judicial review of arbitration procedures is merely .whether a party to arbitration has been denied a fundamentally fair hearing”); 9 U.S.C. § 10 (c) (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roni K. Dogherra v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
See Newark Stereotypers’ Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 397 F.2d 594, 598 (3d Cir.) (dictum), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 378 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968); Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc. v. Liang, 653 F.2d 310, 313 (7th Cir. 1981); Karppinen v. Karl Kiefer Machine Co., 187 F.2d 32, 34-35 (2d Cir. 1951) (assuming without deciding the question) (construing 9 U.S.C. § 10 (a)).
cited
Cited "see"
Fairchild & Co. v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad
See Newark Stereotypers Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 397 F.2d 594, 599 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 378 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert John Austin v. United States
(2×)
See De Toro v. Pepersack, 332 F.2d 341 (4 Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 909 , 85 S.Ct. 198 , 13 L.Ed.2d 181 (1964), (Maryland law) and Tynan v. Eyman, 397 F.2d 53 (9 Cir. 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 383 , 21 L.Ed.2d 366 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Newark Stereotypers' Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 397 F.2d 594, 598 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 378 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968); Saxis Steamship Co. v. Multifacs International Traders, Inc., 375 F.2d 577, 581-582 (2d Cir.1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Evans
See also State v. Pruett, 425 S.W.2d 116, 118 (Mo.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 380 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968) (accord); State v. Lutjen, 661 S.W.2d 845, 849 (Mo.App.1983) ("The defense of alibi, of course, asserts that the accused was, at the time, at a place other than where the crime was committed and so could not have been the perpetrator”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James W. Bonar and Beverly J. Bonar v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., John S. Mc Nally, Jr., Ed Leavenworth
Kaiser Cement, 791 F.2d at 1339 ; Dogherra, 679 F.2d at 1297 ; see also Newark Stereotypers' Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 397 F.2d 594, 599 (3d Cir.) (fraud must deprive party of fair hearing), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 378 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968); cf. Rozier v. Ford Motor Co., 573 F.2d 1332, 1339 (5th Cir.1978) (relief from judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3) requires showing that perjury prevented losing party from "fully and fairly presenting his case or defense") 8 ; Harre v. A.H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilkes-Barre Publishing Co. v. Newspaper Guild of Wilkes-Barre, Local 120
Compare Newark Stereotypers’ Union Local No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 397 F.2d 594 , 596 & n. 2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 378 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968) with Ludwig Honold Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Meyer v. McDonnell
See, e.g., Newark Stereotypers’ Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 397 F. 2d 594 (3d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U. S. 954 ; Great American Insurance Co. v. Horab, 309 F. 2d 262 (8th Cir. 1962); New York Life Insurance Co. v. Bacalis, 94 F. 2d 200 (5th Cir. 1938); Lone Ranger, Inc. v. Currey, 79 F. Supp. 190 (M.D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
General Warehousemen and Helpers Local 767, Affiliated With International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. Standard Brands, Inc., General Warehousemen and Helpers Local 767, Affiliated With International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Cross-Appellee v. Standard Brands, Inc., Cross-Appellant
Compare Newark Stereotypers' Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 3 Cir., 397 F.2d 594 , Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 378 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968), With Ludwig Honold Mfg.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
General Warehousemen & Helpers Local 767 v. Standard Brands, Inc.
Compare Newark Stereotypers’ Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., 3 Cir., 397 F.2d 594 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 954 , 89 S.Ct. 378 , 21 L.Ed.2d 365 (1968), with Ludwig Honold Mfg.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Newark Stereotypers' Union No. 18
v.
Newark Morning Ledger Co.
v.
Newark Morning Ledger Co.
No. 498.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 18, 1968.
William B. Meagher and Thomas L. Morrissey for petitioner., Bernard G. Segal, Samuel D. Slade, and Donald A. Robinson for respondents.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.