green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tavares
See Anderson ___ ________ v. United States, 403 F.2d 451, 454 (7th Cir. 1968) ______________ (inconsistency in witness' testimony between trials is not, alone, enough to show perjury), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 903 _____ ______ (1969); cf. United States v. Lebon, 4 F.3d 1, 2 (1st Cir. ___ _____________ _____ 1993) (defendant did not show perjury merely by showing that witness changed her story between post-arrest interview and -12- 12 trial).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tavares
See Anderson v. United States, 403 F.2d 451, 454 (7th Cir.1968) (inconsistency in witness’ testimony between trials is not, alone, enough to show perjury), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 903 , 89 *15 S.Ct. 1009, 22 L.Ed.2d 215 (1969); cf. United States v. Lebon, 4 F.3d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1993) (defendant did not show perjury merely by showing that witness changed her story between post-arrest interview and trial).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hiland Dairy, Inc.
v.
Kroger Co.
v.
Kroger Co.
No. 986.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 10, 1969.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.