green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McVicker
See Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738, 741 (9th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969); see also Barona, 56 F.3d at 1096 (finding that the United States requesting that Italian police put a “watch” on two suspects did not create a joint venture).
cited
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2570, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4282 Wang Zong Xiao v. Janet Reno, in Her Capacity as Attorney General of the United States Michael J. Yamaguchi, in His Capacity as United States Attorney for the Northern District of California Reginald L. Boyd, in His Capacity as United States Marshal for the Northern District of California Doris Meissner, in Her Capacity as Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, and David Ilchert, in His Capacity as District Director for the Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738, 745 (9th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969); see also United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Wang Zong Xiao v. Reno
See Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738, 745 (9th Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969); see also United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maria Cecilia Barona, United States of America v. Janet Martinez, Aka: Luz Janet Martinez & Luz Janeth Martinez, United States of America v. Brian Bennett, United States of America v. Mario Ernesto Villabona-Alvarado, A/K/A Tico, United States of America v. Michael Dubarry McCarver A/K/A Mike Bald, United States of America v. Michael Harris, A/K/A Tall Make
See Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738, 741 (9th Cir.1968) (information provided to foreign official which led to search does not render investigation "joint"), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barona
See Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738, 741 (9th Cir.1968) (information provided to foreign official which led to search does not render investigation “joint”), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rene Martin Verdugo-Urquidez
(2×)
See Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738, 745 (9th Cir.1968) (Stonehill ), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969). 149 Whether this court should embrace such a due process "shock-the-conscience" test, however, is not a question that needs to be reached in this case.
examined
Cited "see"
Continental Seafoods, Inc. v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Sugarman v. Forbragd, 405 F.2d 1189 (9th Cir, 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2103 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969). 11 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillips
Accord, Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969); Stowe v. Devoy, 588 F.2d 336 (2d Cir. 1978). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Lee Allison v. State of New Jersey
See Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Allison v. New Jersey
See Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Air Crash at Charlotte, Nc on July 2, 1994
See also Krause v. Chartier, 406 F.2d 898, 902 (1st Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969) (citing Berguido and suggesting that it too believed Section 1441(e) only precluded “opinion evidence” from use at trials).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mollica
(2×)
Ford v. Arizona, 409 U.S. 1128 , 93 S.Ct. 950 , 35 L.Ed.2d 261 (1973); see Commonwealth v. Wallace, supra, 356 Mass. 92 , 248 N.E.2d 246 ; see also Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738, 743 (9th Cir.1968) (“silver platter” reasoning used when refusing to suppress evidence seized by foreign agents in manner contrary to United States standards), cert. den., 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969); People v. Helfend, 1 Cal.App.3d 873, 886-88 , 82 Cal.Rptr. 295, 304-05 (1969) (same), cert. den. sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Woods v. City Court of City of Tucson
See also, Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. den. 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 , reh. den., 396 U.S. 870 , 90 S.Ct. 39 , 24 L.Ed.2d 125 (1969); United States v. Antonelli, 434 F.2d 335 (2nd Cir. 1970); United States v. Casteel, 476 F.2d 152 (10th Cir. 1973); United States v. Bolden, 461 F.2d 998 (8th Cir. 1972); State v. Pearson, 15 Or.App. 1 , 514 P.2d 884 (1973); State v. McDaniel, 44 Ohio App.2d 163 , 337 N.E.2d 173 (1975); Annot., 31 A.L.R.3d 565 , 666 (1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Seabrook International Foods, Inc. v. Harris
See, e. g., Sugarman v. Forbragd, 405 F.2d 1189 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2103 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ford
See also Stonehill v. United States, 405 F.2d 738 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2102 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
G. A. Portello & Co. v. Butz
See Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965); Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Elec., Radio and Machine Workers, 367 U.S. 396, 408 , 81 S.Ct. 1529 , 6 L.Ed.2d 924 (1961); see also Sugarman v. Forbragd, 267 F.Supp. 817, 822-824 (N.D.Cal.1967), aff’d 405 F.2d 1189 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. den. 395 U.S. 960 , 89 S.Ct. 2103 , 23 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stonehill
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1351.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1969.
Hans A. Nathan, Bert B. Rand, Joseph A. Ball, John L. Ingoldsby, Jr., and Bertram H. Ross for petitioners., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.