green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Patrick Bell, Sr., Etc. v. City of Milwaukee, Howard Johnson and Edwin Shaffer, Patrick Bell, Sr., Etc. v. Thomas Grady, Jr., Patrick Bell, Sr., Etc. v. City of Milwaukee
See Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1). 84 And even where the witness adopts the prior statement, the wholesale admission of such prior statements (especially statements found in a formal police document such as a criminal complaint) might allow parties to create an unwarranted aura of officiality and credibility surrounding the witness' testimony. 85 See United States v. Bennett, 409 F.2d 888, 894-895 (2d Cir.1969), certiorari denied, 396 U.S. 852 , 90 S.Ct. 113 , 24 L.Ed.2d 101 , rehearing denied, 396 U.S. 949 , 90 S.Ct. 376 , 24 L.Ed.2d 256 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. City of Milwaukee
See Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1). 84 And even where the witness adopts the prior statement, the wholesale admission of such prior statements (especially statements found in a formal police document such as a criminal complaint) might allow parties to create an unwarranted aura of officiality and credibility surrounding the witness’ testimony. 85 See United States v. Bennett, 409 F.2d 888, 894-895 (2d Cir.1969), certiorari denied, 396 U.S. 852 , 90 S.Ct. 113 , 24 L.Ed.2d 101 , rehearing denied, 396 U.S. 949 , 90 S.Ct. 376 , 24 L.Ed.2d 256 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alphonse Sisca
See United States v. Bennett, 409 F.2d 888, 901 (2 Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 852 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carmine Persico, Salvatore Albanese, Ralph Spero, and Hugh McIntosh
See United States v. Bennett, 409 F.2d 888, 901 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 852 , 90 S.Ct. 113 , 24 L.Ed.2d 101 (1969); see also United States v. Marti, 421 F.2d 1263 (2d Cir. Feb. 3, 1970); United States v. Palermo, 410 F.2d 468, 472 (7th Cir. 1969); United States v. Varelli, 407 F.2d 735, 750-751 (7th Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Redding v. State
See United States v. Bennett (C.A.2d), 415 F.2d 1113, 1114 (cert. den., see 396 U.S. 852 , 90 S.Ct. 113 , 117, 24 L.Ed.2d 101 ); Williams v. United States (C.A.9th), 418 F.2d 159, 162 ; and Lyon v. United States (C.A.5th), 416 F.2d 91, 93 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patsy Kelly Jarrett v. Frank R. Headley, Superintendent of Bedford Hills Correctional Facility
When the number of photographs shown has not been so small as to make the presentation itself unfairly suggestive, see United States v. Boston, 508 F.2d 1171, 1177 (2d Cir.1974) (eight not impermissibly suggestive), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1001 , 95 S.Ct. 2401 , 44 L.Ed.2d 669 (1975); see also United States v. Bennett, 409 F.2d 888, 898 (2d Cir.) (six not impermissibly suggestive), ce rt. denied, 396 U.S. 852 , 90 S.Ct. 113 , 24 L.Ed.2d 101 (1969), and there is nothing suggestive in the officials’ manner of presentation, the principal question is whether the picture of the accused, matching d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cherry
(2×)
See also, United States v. Bennett, 409 F.2d 888 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 852 , 90 S.Ct. 113 , 117, 24 L.Ed.2d 101 ; 402 U.S. 984 , 91 S.Ct. 1670 , 29 L.Ed.2d 149 ; United States v. Ash, 413 U.S. 300 , 93 S.Ct. 2568 , 37 L.Ed.2d 619 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Ochs
(2×)
See also United States v. Bennett, 409 F.2d 888, 896-97 (2 Cir. 1969), Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 852 , 90 S.Ct. 113 , 24 L.Ed.2d 101 (1969); United States v. Jenkins, 496 F.2d 57, 72-74 (2 Cir. 1974), Cert. denied, 420 U.S. 925 , 95 S.Ct. 1119 (1975); Taylor v. State, 342 F.Supp. 911, 915 (D.Minn.1972), Aff'd, 466 F.2d 1119 (8 Cir. 1972), Cert. denied, 410 U.S. 956 , 93 S.Ct. 1425 , 35 L.Ed.2d 689 (1973); Contra, In re Calandra, 332 F.Supp. 737, 745 (N.D.Ohio 1971), Aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
White v. State
See also United States v. Bennett, 409 F.2d 888, 898-900 (2nd Cir. 1969) cert. den. 396 U.S. 852 , 90 S.Ct. 113 , 24 L.Ed.2d 101 ; United States v. Ervin, 436 F.2d 1331 , 1334 (5th Cir. 1971); United States v. Fitzpatrick, 437 F.2d 19, 25-26 (2nd Cir. 1970); United States v. Williams, 436 F.2d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Von Roeder, 435 F.2d 1004, 1010 (10th Cir. 1971); United States v. Collins, 416 F.2d 696, 699 (4th Cir. 1969) ; United States v. Robinson, 406 F.2d 64, 69 (7th Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles J. Ash, Jr.
See, e. g., United States v. Bennett, 409 F.2d 888 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom Haywood v. United States, 396 U.S. 852 , 90 S.Ct. 113 , 24 L.Ed.2d 101 (1969); United States v. Ballard, 423 F.2d 127 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. Robinson, 406 F.2d 64 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 395 U.S. 926 , 89 S.Ct. 1783 , 23 L.Ed.2d 243 (1969); McGee v. United States, 402 F.2d 434 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 394 U.S. 908 , 89 S.Ct. 1020 , 22 L.Ed.2d 220 (1969); Baldwin v. State, 5 Md.App. 22 , 245 A.2d 98 (1968); State v. Stamey, 3 N.C.App. 200 , 164 S.E.2d 547 (1968); People v. Lawrence, 4 Cal.3d 273…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Alston
See United States v. Teller, supra; United States v. Lawler, supra; United States v. Lee, supra; see also United States v. Bennett, 2 Cir.1969, 409 F.2d 888 , cert. denied, Haywood v. United States, 396 U.S. 852 , 90 S.Ct. 113 , 24 L.Ed.2d 101 , which requires that the defendant demonstrate to the trial judge a “particularized need” for the home address of a witness before production of that address is required.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Armiento and Edward Jernek
Compare United States v. Bennett, 415 F.2d 1113, 1114, 1115 (2 Cir.), cert. denied 396 U.S. 852 , 90 S.Ct. 113 , 24 L.Ed.2d 101 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leo Junior Valez
Compare United States v. Zeiler, 427 F.2d 1305 , (3d Cir. 1970) (holding accused has right to counsel) with United States v. Ballard, 423 F.2d 127 (5th Cir. 1970), McGee v. United States, 402 F.2d 434 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 908 , 89 S.Ct. 1020 , 22 L.Ed.2d 220 (1969) and United States v. Bennett, 409 F.2d 888 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Jessup v. United States, 396 U.S. 852 , 90 S.Ct. 117 , 24 L.Ed.2d 101 (1969) (holding no right to counsel).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dalton, aka Aulton
v.
California
v.
California
No. 62.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1969.
396 U.S. 852
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles P. Just, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Published
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.