Willis v. United States, 396 U.S. 864 (1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Willis v. United States, 396 U.S. 864 (1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
66 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. James S. Chapman, United States of America v. Donald P. Percival (ca4, 1991-06-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. James S. Chapman, United States of America v. Donald P. Percival
4th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Shipp, 409 F.2d 33, 36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 864 (1969).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. John R. Nance
4th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
United States v. Arroyo, 805 F.2d 589, 597 (5th Cir. 1986); United States v. Martinez, 763 F.2d 1297, 1312 (11th Cir. 1985); see United States v. Shipp, 409 F.2d 33, 36-37 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 864 (1969).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Charles Edward Jackson, Jr.
4th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Shipp, 409 F.2d 33, 36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 864 (1969); see also Pigford v. United States, 518 F.2d 831 (4th Cir.1975). 5 Jackson has filed motions with this Court for leave to file a supplemental brief, in addition to the brief filed by his court-appointed attorney, and for leave to file a reply brief.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Robert C. Williams
4th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Shipp, 409 F.2d 33, 36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 864 (1969); see also Pigford v. United States, 518 F.2d 831 (4th Cir.1975). 7 Finding that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and the record, that the decisional process would not be aided significantly by oral argument, and that Williams' contentions are without merit, we dispense with oral argument pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Local Rule 34(a) and affirm the judgment of the district court. 8 AFFIRMED.
cited Cited "see" Johnson v. United States
D.C. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tinker v. United States, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 125 , 417 F.2d 542 , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 864 , 90 S.Ct. 141 , 24 L.Ed.2d 118 (1969).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Donald Eugene Colyer
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tinker v. United States, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 125 , 417 F.2d 542 , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 864 , 90 S.Ct. 141 , 24 L.Ed.2d 118 (1969).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Emerson David Redstone, United States of America v. Dale Redstone
8th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Shipp, 409 F.2d 33 (4th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 864 , 90 S.Ct. 140 , 24 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. John C. Tarantino, United States of America v. Robert H. Burns, United States of America v. Fred B. Black, Jr., United States of America v. Wilfred Samuel Bell, A/K/A Sam Bell
D.C. Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Lee v. United States, 368 F.2d 834, 836-37 (D.C.Cir.1966); see also Tinker v. United States, 417 F.2d 542 , 545 n. 15 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 864 , 90 S.Ct. 141 , 24 L.Ed.2d 118 (1969); Dixon v. United States, 303 F.2d 226 (D.C.Cir.1962) 9 That this was the grounds for the trial judge's decision to exclude is indicated by his statement that "I query whether or not it is collateral as to what she yelled at Sergeant Murphy [sic] when she got bounced out of this house, after having a fight." Tr. 4277-78 10 Burns makes a similar objection to Ribera's testimony regarding details of d…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rockwell, Ernest G. (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Tinker v. United States, 417 F.2d 542 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 864 , 90 S.Ct. 141 , 24 L.Ed.2d 118 (1969); United States v. Corbin, 734 F.2d 643, 655 (11th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Anthony J. Brooks, United States of America v. John J. Hazel, Jr., (Two Cases)
D.C. Cir. · 1977 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Tinker v. United States, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 125 , 128 n. 16, 417 F.2d 542 , 545 n. 16, cert, denied, 396 U.S. 864 , 90 S.Ct. 141 , 24 L.Ed.2d 118 (1969); United States v. Turquitt, 557 F.2d 464, 471 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Banks, 520 F.2d 627, 631 (7th Cir. 1975); United States v. Norman, 402 F.2d 73, 77 (9th Cir. 1968), cert, denied, 397 U.S. 938 , 90 S.Ct. 949 , 25 L.Ed.2d 119 (1970); United States v. Estell, 539 F.2d 697, 700 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 982 , 97 S.Ct. 497 , 50 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976). 34 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Willis
v.
United States
No. 296.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1969.
396 U.S. 864
Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.