Bhd. of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Elgin, Joliet & E. Ry. Co., 396 U.S. 886 (1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Bhd. of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Elgin, Joliet & E. Ry. Co., 396 U.S. 886 (1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Star Television, Inc., Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Community Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Citizens Television Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Federal Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Heritage Radio and Television Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Genesee Valley Television Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Main Broadcast Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Rochester Telecasters, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor (cadc, 1969-10-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Star Television, Inc., Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Community Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Citizens Television Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Federal Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Heritage Radio and Television Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Genesee Valley Television Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Main Broadcast Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor. Rochester Telecasters, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Flower City Television Corp., Intervenor
D.C. Cir. · 1969 · confidence medium
Decided Jan. 30, 1969, Petition for Rehearing Denied April 1, 1969, CertiorariDenied Oct. 27, 1969, See 90 S.Ct. 171, 178.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Central Florida Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Cowles Broadcasting, Inc., Intervenor
D.C. Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
We contemplate that such instances of equipoise will be exceedingly rare if the Commission seriously undertakes a full comparison 1 FCC Petition for Rehearing at 9 (citing Greater Boston, 143 U.S.App.D.C. at 396 , 444 F.2d at 854 ) 2 1965 Policy Statement on Comparative Broadcast Hearings, 1 F.C.C.2d 393 (1965) 3 See Central Florida Enterprises, Inc., 194 U.S.App.D.C. --- at ---, 598 F.2d 37 at 42 (1978); Seven (7) League Productions, Inc., 1 F.C.C.2d 1597 , 1598 (1965); See also Belo Broadcasting Corp., 47 F.C.C.2d 540 , 543-44 (1974) 4 62 F.C.C.2d at 958 (emphasis original) 5 194 U.S.App.D.C…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pasadena Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Western Broadcasting Corporation and Voice in Pasadena, Inc., Intervenors. Goodson-Todman Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Western Broadcasting Corporation and Voice in Pasadena, Inc., Intervenors. Charles W. Jobbins v. Federal Communications Commission, Western Broadcasting Corporation and Voice in Pasadena, Inc., Intervenors. Voice in Pasadena, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Western Broadcasting Corporation, Intervenor. Pacific Fine Music, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Western Broadcasting Corporation and Voice in Pasadena, Inc., Intervenors. Orange Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Western Broadcasting Corporation, Intervenor
D.C. Cir. · 1977 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Star Television, Inc. v. FCC, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 71 , 74, 416 F.2d 1086 , 1089, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 888 , 90 S.Ct. 171 , 24 L.Ed.2d 163 (1969); Anthony, supra note 38, 24 Stan.L.Rev. at 27-33.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fidelity Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Rko General, Inc., Intervenor
D.C. Cir. · 1975 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Star Television, Inc. v. FCC, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 71 , 416 F.2d 1086 , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 888 , 90 S.Ct. 171 , 24 L.Ed.2d 163 (1969) aff’g Flower City Television Corp., 9 F.C.C.2d 249 , recon. denied, 10 F.C.C.2d 718 (1967); Community Broadcasting Corp. v. FCC, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 230 , 363 F.2d 717 (1966); Tennessee Television, Inc. v. FCC, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 316 , 262 F.2d 28 (1958); Pinellas Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 236 , 230 F.2d 204 , cert. denied, 350 U.S. 1007 , 76 S.Ct. 650 , 100 L.Ed. 869 (1956); W.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen
v.
Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.
No. 58.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 27, 1969.
396 U.S. 886
Alex Elson and Harold C. Heiss for petitioner. Harlan L. Hackbert for respondent.
Published

C. A. 7fch Cir. Certiorari denied.