green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
See International Ass’n of Machinists v. NLRB, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 239 , 241-42, 414 F.2d 1135 , 1137-38, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 889 , 90 S.Ct. 174 , 24 L.Ed.2d 163 (1969); NLRB v. Alamo White Truck Service, Inc., 273 F.2d 238 , 241 — 42 (5th Cir. 1959). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Zim's Foodliner, Inc., D/B/A Zim's Iga Foodliner, and S&o, Inc., D/B/A Paul's Iga Foodliner v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
See International Association of Machinists v. NLRB, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 239 , 414 F.2d 1135 , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 889 , 90 S.Ct. 174 , 24 L.Ed.2d 163 (1969); NLRB v. Alamo White Truck Service, Inc., 5 Cir., 273 F.2d 238 (1959); Atlantic Technical Services Corp., 202 NLRB No. 13 (1973); B&E Supermart, 195 NLRB 349 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Buckeye Cellulose Corp. v. Sutton Construction Co.
See also Woodward v. Lawson, 225 Ga. 261 , 167 S.E.2d 660 (1969), U.S. cert. denied, 396 U.S. 889 , 90 S.Ct. 175 , 24 L.Ed.2d 163 (The attorney’s lien statute is in derogation of the common law.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
The Buckeye Cellulose Corporation v. Sutton Construction Company, Inc.
See also Woodward v. Lawson, 225 Ga. 261 , 167 S.E.2d 660 (1969), U.S. cert. denied, 396 U.S. 889 , 90 S.Ct. 175 , 24 L.Ed.2d 163 (The attorney's lien statute is in derogation of the common law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brecheen v. Oklahoma
(2×)
See also People v. Gendron, 41 Ill. 2d 351 , 243 N. E. 2d 208 (1968) (adopting “reasonable likelihood” standard), cert. denied, 396 U. S. 889 (1969); State v. Cuevas, 288 N. W. 2d 525 (Iowa 1980) (same); State v. Beier, 263 N. W. 2d 622 (Minn. 1978) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
International Association of Machinists, District Lodge 94, AFL-CIO
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 386.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 27, 1969.
396 U.S. 889
Herbert M. Ansell, Abe Levy, and Plato E. Papps for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Linda Sher for National Labor Relations Board, Richard W. Lund, Paul R. Watkins, Dana Latham, and Henry J. Steinman for Lou Ehlers Cadillac, and Henry W. Low and Edward A. McDermott for Thomas Cadillac, Inc., respondents.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.