green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Poling v. K. Hovnanian Enterprises
See Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455, 460 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 378 , 24 L.Ed.2d 244 (1969); see generally Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9 , 112 S.Ct. 286 , 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
DeFerro v. Coco
See Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 378 , 24 L.Ed.2d 244 (1969) (prothonotary, acting under court directive, entitled to absolute immunity). 11.
cited
Cited "see"
Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.
See Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 396 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 378 , 24 L.Ed.2d 244 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. Hilton
See, Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 378 , 24 L.Ed.2d 244 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Delong Corporation v. Raymond International, Inc
See Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 396 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 378 , 24 L.Ed.2d 244 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Fayle v. Stapley
See Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455, 460 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 378 , 24 L.Ed.2d 244 (1969); International Molders & Allied Workers v. Buchanan Lbr.
discussed
Cited "see"
Raitport v. Provident National Bank
See Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 378 , 24 L.Ed.2d 244 (1969) (Prothonotary of Supreme Court of Pennsylvania); Ginsburg v. Stern, 125 F.Supp. 596 (W.D.Pa.1954) (Prothonotary of Superior Court of Pennsylva *537 nia), aff’d per curiam on other grounds, 225 F.2d 245 (3d Cir. 1955) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see"
McShane Contracting Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Faced with these allegations, to avoid summary judgment defendants were required under Rule 56(e), Fed.R.Civ.P., to ‘come forward with affidavits setting forth specific facts showing that there [was] a genuine issue for trial.’ Tripoli Co. v. Wella Corp., 425 F.2d 932, 935 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831 , 91 S.Ct. 62 , 27 L.Ed.2d 62 (1970); accord, Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 378 , 24 L.Ed.2d 244 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Olympic Junior, Inc., in No. 71-1440 v. David Crystal, Inc. Appeal of Edward Defabio, in No. 71-1441. Appeal of Paul D'alessandro, in No. 71-1442
Faced with these allegations, to avoid summary judgment defendants were required under Rule 56(e), Fed.R.Civ.P., to “come forward with affidavits setting forth specific facts showing that there [was] a genuine issue for trial.” Tripoli Co. v. Wella Corp., 425 F.2d 932, 935 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831 , 91 S.Ct. 62 , 27 L.Ed.2d 62 (1970); accord, Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 378 , 24 L.Ed.2d 244 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Ludwig v. Radio Corporation of America
See, Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455 (3d Cir. 1969), cert. denied 396 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 378 , 24 L.Ed.2d 244 *666 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Raymond D. Capaldo, III v. Julia Long, Monroe County Circuit Court
McCray v. Maryland, 456 F.2d 1 (4th Cir.1972); see also Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 941 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gomez v. Myers
See also Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455, 460 (3d Cir.) (prothonotary who at the direction of the court refused to accept certain papers for filing was wrapped in the cloak of immunity), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 378 , 24 L.Ed.2d 244 (1969). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coggins v. Carpenter
See, e. g., Lockhart v. Hoenstine, 411 F.2d 455 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 378 , 24 L.Ed.2d 244 (1969); Gigliotti v. Redevelopment Auth. of the City of New Castle, 362 F.Supp. 764 (W.D.Pa.1973), aff’d mem., 492 F.2d 1238 (3d Cir. 1974); cf. Hazo v. Geltz, supra, 537 F.2d at 749-750 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Buscaglia, Director, Division of Sales Tax, Erie County
v.
Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.
v.
Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.
No. 549.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 24, 1969.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kess-ler Toch, Solicitor General, and Robert W. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioners. Manly Fleischmann for respondent. Brief of amici curiae in support of the petition was filed by: Robert K. Killian, Attorney General, and F. Michael Ahern, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Connecticut; Earl Fair-cloth, Attorney General, and Winifred Wentworth, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Florida; Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, and Charles Landesman, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of New Jersey; and William C. Sennett, Attorney General, and John Gaines, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Pennsylvania.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.