green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“affidavits composed of hearsay and opinion evidence do not satisfy rule 56 and must be disregarded.”
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Begg v. Moffitt
(2×)
But see United States v. Tijerina, 412 F.2d 661, 667 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 478 , 24 L.Ed.2d 452 (1969).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sharp v. Ashtabula County Sheriff's Office
affidavits composed of hearsay and opinion evidence do not satisfy rule 56 and must be disregarded.
cited
Cited "see"
Porter v. City of Detroit
See, Daily Press, Inc. v. United Press International, 412 F.2d 126, 135 (6th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 480 , 24 L.Ed.2d 453 .
cited
Cited "see"
George Koropoulos v. The Credit Bureau, Inc
See Daily Press, Inc. v. UPI, 412 F.2d 126, 133 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 480 , 24 L.Ed.2d 453 (1969); Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing Company
See Daily Press, Inc. v. United Press, Int’1, 412 F.2d 126, 135 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 480 , 24 L.Ed.2d 453 (1969) (no abuse of discretion where additional discovery would not have affected motion for summary judgment). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Copperweld Corporation v. Imetal
See Daily Press, Inc. v. United Press International, 412 F.2d 126, 134 (6 Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 480 , 24 L.Ed.2d 453 (1969); Texasgulf, Inc. v. Canada Development Corp., 366 F.Supp. 374, 407 (S.D.Tex.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph Santana
(2×)
See United States v. Tijerina, 412 F.2d 661, 664 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 478 , 24 L.Ed.2d 452 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raitport v. Small Business Administration U. S. Government
See, Daily Press Inc. v. United Press International, 412 F.2d 126 (6th Cir. 1969) , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 480 , 24 L.Ed.2d 453 (1969); Turner, v. Lundquist, 377 F.2d 44 (9th Cir. 1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon
See Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639, 643 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 985 , 90 S.Ct. 478 , 24 L.Ed.2d 449 (1969); cf. Phillips v. United States, 312 U.S. 246, 248-253 , 61 S.Ct. 480 , 85 L.Ed. 800 (1941) (Frankfurter, J.).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward A. Wild, Jr. And Louis Corrado
See Tyrone, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 410 F.2d 639, 641 (4th Cir. 1969), cert. denied 396 U.S. 985 , 90 S.Ct. 478 , 24 L.Ed.2d 449 (Dec. 15, 1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Fall River Motor Sales, Inc.
See also Daily Press, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 412 F.2d 126, 135 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 396 U.S. 990 (1969); Blake Brothers Corp. v. Roche, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 556, 560-561 (1981); Commonwealth v. Colonial Motor Sales, Inc., 11 Mass. App. Ct. 800, 810 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joumas v. Maryland Casualty Co.
If the movant establishes by use of the material specified in Rule 56(c) that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the opposing party must come forward with “specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” First National Bank of Arizona v. Cities Service Co., 391 U.S. 253, 288 , 88 S.Ct. 1575, 1592 , 20 L.Ed.2d 569 (1968), [relying on F.R.Civ.P. 56(e)], reh’g denied, 393 U.S. 901 , 89 S.Ct. 63 , 21 L.Ed.2d 188 (1968); see also Daily Press Inc. v. UPI, 412 F.2d 126 (6th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 9…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brandon v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
If the movant establishes by use of the material specified in Rule 56(c) that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the opposing party must come forward with “specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” First National Bank of Arizona v. Cities Services Co., 391 U.S. 253 , 88 S.Ct. 1575 , 20 L.Ed.2d 569 (1967), reh. denied, 393 U.S. 901 , 89 S.Ct. 63 , 21 L.Ed.2d 188 (1968); see also Daily Press Inc. v. UPI, 412 F.2d 126 (6th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 480 , 24 L.Ed.2d 453 (1969); Bufalin…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Swanson
If the movant establishes by use of the material specified in Rule 56(c) that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the opposing party must come forward with “specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” First National Bank of Arizona v. Cities Services Co., 391 U.S. 253 , 88 S.Ct. 1575 , 20 L.Ed.2d 569 (1967), reh. denied, 393 U.S. 901 , 89 S.Ct. 63 , 21 L.Ed.2d 188 (1968); see also Daily Press, Inc. v. UPI, 412 F.2d 126 (6th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 480 , 24 L.Ed.2d 453 (1969); Bufali…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Batchelor v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
See also Daily Press, Inc. v. UPI, 412 F.2d 126 (6th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 480 , 24 L.Ed.2d 453 (1969); Bufalino v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 404 F.2d 1023 (6th Cir.1968); Doff v. Brunswick Corp., 372 F.2d 801 (6th Cir.1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Summers v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
See also Daily Press, Inc. v. UPI, 412 F.2d 126 (6th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 480 , 24 L.Ed.2d 453 (1969); Bufalino v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 404 F.2d 1023 (6th Cir.1968); Doff v. Brunswick Corp., 372 F.2d 801 (9th Cir.1967).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Miguel Felix-Jerez
(4×)
See also, United States v. Tijerina, 412 F.2d 661, 664 (CA10 1969), cert. denied 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 478 , 24 L.Ed.2d 452 ; Lugo v. United States, 370 F.2d 992, 995 (CA9 1967), cert. denied 388 U.S. 916 , 87 S.Ct. 2130 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1357 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Adele Halkin
(4×)
See, e. g., U. S. v. Tijerina, 412 F.2d 661, 666 (10th Cir.), Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 478 , 24 L.Ed.2d 452 (1969); Society of Professional Journalists v. Martin, 431 F.Supp. 1182, 1188 (D.S.C.), Aff'd with qualifications, 556 F.2d 706 (4th Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1022 , 98 S.Ct. 749 , 54 L.Ed.2d 771 (1978); Hirschkop v. Va. State Bar, 421 F.Supp. 1137, 1148-52 (E.D.Va.1976). 2) Other courts have held that the "reasonable likelihood" standard provides insufficient protection for the First Amendment interests, and have required a "serious and imminent threat" of harm bef…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
CENTRAL SOUTH CAROLINA CHAPTER, ETC. v. Martin
(2×)
See also United States v. Tijerina, 412 F.2d 661 (10 Cir. 1969), cert. den., 396 U.S. 990 , 90 S.Ct. 478 , 24 L.Ed.2d 452 ; Farr v. Pitchess, 522 F.2d 464 (9 Cir. 1975), cert. den., 427 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 3200 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1203 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tijerina
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 456.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 1969.
Richard F. Watt, John M. Bowlus, Morton Stavis, and William Kunstler for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Roger A. Pauley for the United States.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Citer courts: N.D. Ohio (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.