green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Owen B. Lampman and Thriftimart, Inc., a California Corporation v. United States District Court for the Centeral District of California, Andjesse W. Curtis, a Judge Thereof, in the Matter of the Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Served Upon Gershon l.lewis. Gershon L. Lewis v. United States of America, in the Matter of the Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Served Upon Joseph r.bolker, President of Walpole Estates, Inc. Joseph R. Bolker v. United States
Oct. 31, 1969, As Modified on Denial of Rehearings Dec. 2, 1969, CertiorariDenied Feb. 24, 27, 1970, See 90 S.Ct. 926, 943.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wesley P. BERNARD, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GULF OIL CORPORATION, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
(2×)
See Local 189, United Papermakers and Paperworkers, AFL-CIO, CLC v. United States, 416 F.2d 980 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970); Quarles v. Philip Morris, Inc., 279 F.Supp. 505 (E.D.Va.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Civil Service Commission v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities ex rel. Trainor
(2×)
See United Papermakers Local 189 v. United States, 416 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S. Ct. 926 , 25 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. City of Yonkers
(2×)
See Local 189, United Papermakers and Paperworkers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980, 996-97 (5th Cir.1969) (intent requisite to § 707(a) suit “may be inferred from the fact that defendants persisted in the. conduct after its racial implications had become known to them”), cert, denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970); Walls v. Mississippi State Department of Public Welfare, 542 F.Supp. 281 , 309 n. 17 (N.D.Miss.1982), affd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 730 F.2d 306 (5th Cir.1984); United States v. Local 357 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Work…
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Inland Marine Industries
(2×)
See Local 189, United Papermakers & Paperworkers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980, 997 (5th Cir.1969) (per Wisdom, J.) (“The requisite intent [to discriminate] may be inferred from the fact that the defendants persisted in the conduct after its racial implications had become known to them.”), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970); McNeil v. McDonough, 515 F.Supp. 113, 129 (D.N.J.1980) (under an ancient rule, courts consider conduct invading others’ rights, though innocent when undertaken, as intentional if the actor fails to correct the problem after someone has…
discussed
Cited "see"
34 Fair empl.prac.cas. 881, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,306 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Inland Marine Industries, Fletcher L. Houston v. Inland Marine Industries Rudy Sutton Douglas Sutton Stanley Sutton and Does I Through Xxx
(2×)
See Local 189, United Papermakers & Paperworkers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980, 997 (5th Cir.1969) (per Wisdom, J.) ("The requisite intent [to discriminate] may be inferred from the fact that the defendants persisted in the conduct after its racial implications had become known to them."), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970); McNeil v. McDonough, 515 F.Supp. 113, 129 (D.N.J.1980) (under an ancient rule, courts consider conduct invading others' rights, though innocent when undertaken, as intentional if the actor fails to correct the problem after someone has point…
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Olin Corp.
(2×)
See, Local 189, United Papermakers & Paperworkers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
10 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1386, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,320 Jessie Stevenson, Etc. v. International Paper Company, Mobile, Alabama
(2×)
See Local 189, United Papermakers & Paperworkers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970); 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-2(h).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nance v. Union Carbide Corp., Consumer Products Division
(2×)
See Local 189, United Papermakers and Paperworkers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980, 984, n.3 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crockett v. Virginia Folding Box Co.
(2×)
See Local 189, United Papermakers & Paperworkers, AFL-CIO, CLC v. United States, 416 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
William E. BING, for Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
(2×)
See Local 189, United Papermakers and Paperworkers v. United States, 5th Cir. 1969, 416 F.2d 980 , cert. denied 1970, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 ; United States v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 5th Cir. 1971, 451 F.2d 418 , cert. denied, 406 U.S. 906 , 92 S.Ct. 1607 , 31 L.Ed.2d 815 . 13 . 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(j) provides in pertinent part: Nothing contained in this subchapter shall be interpreted to require any employer . . . subject to this subchapter [Title VII] to grant preferential treatment to any individual or to any group 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Rock v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
(2×)
See Local 189, United Papermak. & Paperwork, v. United States (5th Cir. 1969) 416 F.2d 980 , 987, n. 8, cert. den. 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed. 100 . .
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
(2×)
See Local 189, United Papermakers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980 , 988-991 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 108 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marcus Jones, Willie B. Hodge, Clifton Nickels and Clarence L. Irving v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc.
(2×)
See Local 189, United Papermakers and Paperworkers v. United States, 5 Cir., 416 F.2d 980 , cert. denied 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (job seniority); United States v. Sheet Metal Workers, supra (union employment referrals); Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 4 Cir., 420 F.2d 1225 (education requirement as criterion for transfer); and Local 53 of the International Ass. of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers v. Vogler, 5 Cir., 407 F.2d 1047 (union membership and referral); see also United States v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 38, 6 Cir., 428 F.2d…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.
(2×)
See Local 189, United Papermakers and Paperworkers, AFL-CIO, CLC v. United States by Mitchell, 416 F.2d 980, 996-997 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (Feb. 24, 1970). 12.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elmo v. Myers v. Gilman Paper Corporation v. International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers (Afl-Cio)
(2×)
See, e.g., United Papermakers and Paperworkers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970)." That seminal case, however, did not authorize wholesale revisions of a seniority system absent a finding of present perpetuation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elmo v. Myers v. Gilman Paper Corporation v. International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers (Afl-Cio)
(2×)
See, e. g., United Papermakers and Paperworkers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970).” That seminal case, however, did not authorize wholesale revisions of a seniority system absent a finding of present perpetuation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
11 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1450, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,633, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,091 Boston M. Chance, and Louis C. Mercado, Individually on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Board of Examiners and the Board of Education of the City of New York, and Council of Supervisors and Administrators of the City of New York, Local 1, Sasco, Afl-Cio, Intervenor-Appellant
(2×)
See also Local 189, United Papermakers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980 , 994 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970). 15 That plaintiffs herein are proceeding under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 ,1983 does not render defendants' seniority system any more susceptible to attack.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard B. Sagers v. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Truck Drivers and Helpers, Local Union No. 728
(2×)
See, e.g., Local 189, United Papermakers & Paperworkers v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 416 F.2d 980 , cert. denied, 1970, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 ; Bing v. Roadway Express, Inc., 5 Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 687 ; Franks v. Bowman Transp.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chance v. Board of Examiners & the Board of Education
(2×)
See also Local 189, United Papermakers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980, 994 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peltier v. City of Fargo
(2×)
See, e. g., Local 189, United Papermakers & Paperworkers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980, 996 (5th Cir. 1969), cert, denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
10 Fair empl.prac.cas. 404, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9865 Henry Lee Rogers, Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. International Paper Company, Appellees-Cross-Appellants
(2×)
See, e.g., Local 189, United Papermakers & Paperworkers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980, 996 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. International Paper Co.
(2×)
See, e. g., Local 189, United Papermakers & Paperworkers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980, 996 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James S. CAREY, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant, v. GREYHOUND BUS CO., INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellants-Cross Appellees
(2×)
See also Local 189, infra. The facts in the case sub judice are similar to those in Local 189, United Papermakers and Paperworkers v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 416 F.2d 980 , cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harold FRANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, Johnny Lee, Intervenor-Appellant, v. BOWMAN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
(2×)
See, e. g., Local 189, United Pa-permakers and Paperworkers, AFL-CIO, CLC v. United States, 5th Cir. 1969, 416 F.2d 980 , cert. denied 1970, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (seniority relief).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Watkins v. UNITED STEEL WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOC. NO. 2369
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Local 189, 416 F.2d 980 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 (1970) ; United States v. Georgia Power Co., 474 F.2d 906 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 451 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U. S. 906 , 92 S.Ct. 1607 (1972); Robinson v. Lorillard Corp., 444 F.2d 791, 798 (4th Cir. 1971); United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 446 F.2d 652, 657-659 (2d Cir. 1971); Quarles v. Philip Morris, Inc., 279 F.Supp. 505 (E.D.Va. 1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trivett v. Tri-State Container Corp.
(2×)
Sprogis v. United Air Lines, Inc., C.A. 7th (1971), 444 F.2d 1194, 1201 [10] ; see also Local No. 189, United Paperworkers v. United States, C.A. 5th (1969), 416 F.2d 980 , 996, certiorari denied (1970), 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 , and Jones v. Lee May Motor Freight, Inc., C.A. 10th (1970), 431 F.2d 245 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sanders v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n
See, e. g., United States v. Local 189, United Paper-makers and Paperworkers, 301 F.Supp. 906, 919-25 (E.D.La.1969), aff’d, 416 F.2d 980 (5 Cir. 1969), certf denied, 397 U.S. 919 (1970) ; United States v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 38, 428 F.2d 144, 151-52 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 943 (1970). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sanders v. Air Line Pilots Association, International
See, e. g., United States v. Local 189, United Papermakers and Paperworkers, 301 F.Supp. 906, 919-25 (E.D.La.1969), aff'd, 416 F.2d 980 (5 Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 (1970); United States v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 38, 428 F.2d 144, 151-52 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 943 (1970) 4 See note 1, supra
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lampman
v.
United States District Court for the Central District of California
v.
United States District Court for the Central District of California
No. 1014.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1970.
William J. Currer, Jr., for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Joseph M. Howard for respondent United States.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.