New York Feed Co. v. Leary, 397 U.S. 98 (1970). · Go Syfert
Search
New York Feed Co. v. Leary, 397 U.S. 98 (1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
92 citation events across 42 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bryers v. State (texcrimapp, 1972-05-31) · Strongest negative: Drive in Theatres, Inc., T/a Midway Drive in Theatre v. Damon Huskey, Sheriff of Rutherford County, North Carolina (ca4, 1970-11-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" Drive in Theatres, Inc., T/a Midway Drive in Theatre v. Damon Huskey, Sheriff of Rutherford County, North Carolina
4th Cir. · 1970 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Milky Way v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288 (1969), aff’d, 397 U.S. 98 , 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970).
discussed Cited "see" Bryers v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1972 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288, 296-297 (S.D.N.Y.1969) (3 judge court), aff’d, 397 U.S. 98 , 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970) (per curiam) ; United States v. Green, 284 A.2d 879 (D.C.App.1971) ; People v. Morgan, 326 N.Y.S.2d 976 (N.Y.City Ct.1971). 5 .
cited Cited "see" Jeannette Rankin Brigade v. Chief of Capitol Police
D.D.C. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Milky Way Productions v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y.1969), aff’d, New York Feed Co. v. Leary, 397 U.S. 98 , 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970). 3.
cited Cited "see" Platt Amusement Arcade, Inc. v. Joyce
W.D. Pa. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Milky Way Productions Inc. v. Leary, D.C., 305 F.Supp. 288 (3 judge court), cert, denied, 397 U.S. 98 , 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 78 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Shinall v. Worrell
E.D.N.C. · 1970 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288 (S.D.N.Y.1969) affd. 397 U.S. 98 , 90 S.Ct. 817 , 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NEW YORK FEED CO., INC., ET AL.
v.
LEARY ET AL.
992.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 2, 1970.
397 U.S. 98
Per Curiam.
Cited by 26 opinions  |  Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Herald Price Fahringer for appellants in No. 992. Ralph J. Schwarz, Jr., and Albert B. Gerber for appellants in No. 998.

J. Lee Rankin and Stanley Buchsbaum for appellee Leary in both cases, and Frank S. Hogan, pro se, and Michael R. Juviler for appellee Hogan in both cases. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. La Torella, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, filed a motion to dismiss or affirm for the Attorney General of New York.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set for oral argument.

[*] Together with No. 998, Milky Way Productions, Inc., et al. v. Leary et al., also on appeal from the same court.