Griffin v. Craven, 397 U.S. 994 (1970). · Go Syfert
Search
Griffin v. Craven, 397 U.S. 994 (1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Goldstein (ded, 1972-08-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Goldstein
D. Del. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Note 1 supra. See also United States v. Conway, 415 F.2d 158 (C.A.3, 1969), cert. denied 397 U.S. 994 , 90 S.Ct. 1131 , 25 L.Ed.2d 401 (1970), overruled on other grounds United States v. Zeiler, 427 F.2d 1305 (C.A.3, 1970), wherein the court stated: “[T]he Committee [the Advisory Committee on Rules], as well as the federal courts, have made it clear that amended Rule 7(f) leaves undisturbed the discretionary nature of the granting of a bill of particulars.” Id. at 161. .
discussed Cited "see" George Terry Young v. State of Maryland (2×)
4th Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Cockrell v. Oberhauser, 413 F.2d 256, 258 (9 Cir. 1969), cert. denied, Cockrell v. Carter, 397 U.S. 994 , 90 S.Ct. 1130 , 25 L.Ed.2d 401 (1970), where one defendant in a joint trial was tried by a jury and the other by the court.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Simmons v. Arvonio
D.N.J. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
However, since “reliability is the linchpin in determining the admissibility of identification testimony,” Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 114 , 97 S.Ct. 2243, 2253 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977), the suggestiveness of an identification procedure must be evaluated in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding it.” Id. at 104 , 97 S.Ct. at 2248 (citing Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 302 , 87 S.Ct. 1967, 1972 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967); see also United States v. Conway, 415 F.2d 158, 163 (3d Cir.1969), cert. denied 397 U.S. 994 , 90 S.Ct. 1131 , 25 L.Ed.2d 401 (1970)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hakeem v. Beyer
D.N.J. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
However, since “reliability is the linchpin in determining the admissibility of identification testimony,” Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 114 , 97 S.Ct. 2243, 2253 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977), the suggestiveness of an identification procedure must be evaluated in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding it.” Id. at 104 , 97 S.Ct. at 2247 -48 (citing Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 302 , 87 S.Ct. 1967, 1972 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967)); see also United States v. Conway, 415 F.2d 158, 163 (3d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 994 , 90 S.Ct. 1131 , 25 L.Ed.2d 401 (1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Griffin
v.
Craven, Warden
No. 838.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1970.
397 U.S. 994
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Edsel W. Haws and Daniel J. Kremer, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
Published

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.