green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases, 1997–2018 · 2 courts ·
…one of the most basic of the rights guaranteed by the confrontation clause is the accused's right to be present in the courtroom at every stage of his trial.
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Sullivan
one of the most basic of the rights guaranteed by the confrontation clause is the accused's right to be present in the courtroom at every stage of his trial.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Puthoff
(2×)
one of the most basic of the rights guaranteed by the confrontation clause is the accused's right to be present in the courtroom at every stage of his trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Davis
See Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337 , 90 S.Ct. 1057 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 353 , reh'g denied, 398 U.S. 915 , 90 S.Ct. 1684 , 26 L.Ed. 2d 80 (1970); Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97 , 54 S.Ct. 330 , 78 L.Ed. 674 (1934); Lewis v. United States, 146 U.S. 370 , 13 S.Ct. 136 , 36 L.Ed. 1011 (1892); State v. Smith, 29 N.J. 561 , 150 A. 2d 769 , cert. denied, 361 U.S. 861 , 80 S.Ct. 120 , 4 L.Ed. 2d 103 (1959).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cook
See Illinois v Allen, 397 US 337, 342, 343 , 25 L Ed 2d 353 , 90 S Ct 1057 , rehearing denied, 398 US 915 , 26 L Ed 2d 80 , 90 S Ct 1684 (1970), and cases cited therein.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Illinois
v.
Allen Meyer v. City of Chicago Catanzaro v. Mancusi, Warden Sharpe v. United States Rando v. Beto, Corrections Director Blackman v. Pennsylvania Urbano v. News Syndicate Co., Inc. Viands v. Cox, Penitentiary Superintendent Heard v. United States Prewitt v. Arizona ex rel. Eyman, Warden
v.
Allen Meyer v. City of Chicago Catanzaro v. Mancusi, Warden Sharpe v. United States Rando v. Beto, Corrections Director Blackman v. Pennsylvania Urbano v. News Syndicate Co., Inc. Viands v. Cox, Penitentiary Superintendent Heard v. United States Prewitt v. Arizona ex rel. Eyman, Warden
No. 606; No. 1223; No. 528; No. 904; No. 1103; No. 1309; No. 1435; No. 1494; No. 1552; No. 1676.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 18, 1970.
Cited by 16 opinions | Published
Citer courts: South Dakota Supreme Court (2) · Supreme Court of Kansas (1)
Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar