Harris v. Texas, 400 U.S. 1003 (1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Harris v. Texas, 400 U.S. 1003 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “ ‘ “Possess” as used in criminal statutes ordinarily signifies an intentional control of a designated thing accompanied by a knowledge of its character’ ”
86 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dawkins v. State (md, 1988-10-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Dawkins v. State
Md. · 1988 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
possess" as used in criminal statutes ordinarily signifies an intentional control of a designated thing accompanied by a knowledge of its character
discussed Cited "see" State v. Winfrey
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 531-32 , 271 A.2d 74 (1970) (needle marks on defendant’s arm evidence that he, rather than wife or houseguest, owned heroin found in bedroom), cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Alfonso
Conn. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 532 , 271 A.2d 74 (1970), cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
discussed Cited "see" Temistocles Ramirez De Arellano v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Defense (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First Nat'l City Bank, 431 F.2d 394, 399-402 (2d Cir.1970), vacated and remanded, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971), aff'd on remand, 442 F.2d 530 (2d Cir.1971), rev'd on other grounds, 406 U.S. 759 , 92 S.Ct. 1808 , 32 L.Ed.2d 466 (1972); Compania de Gas de Nuevo Laredo, S.A. v. Entex, 686 F.2d 322, 327 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1041 , 103 S.Ct. 1435 , 75 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983) (relying solely on Banco Nacional de Cuba).
cited Cited "see" State v. Peary
Conn. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 529 , 271 A.2d 74 , cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Schoenbneelt
Conn. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 531 , 271 A.2d 74 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
cited Cited "see" Menendez v. Saks And Company
2d Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See 270 F. Supp. 1004 (S.D.N.Y.), 431 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1970), 400 U.S.1019, 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971), 442 F.2d 530 (2d Cir. 1971).
cited Cited "see" Menendez v. Saks
2d Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See 270 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.N.Y.), 431 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1970), 400 U.S.1019, 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971), 442 F.2d 530 (2d Cir. 1971).
cited Cited "see" Maltina Corporation and Julio Blanco-Herrera v. Cawy Bottling Company, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First National City Bank, S.D.N.Y.1967, 270 F.Supp. 1004 , rev’d, 2 Cir. 1970, 431 F. 2d 394 , remanded for further consideration, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.
cited Cited "see" Connecticut State Department of Public Welfare v. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Social and Rehabilitation Service
2d Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Conner v. Finch, 314 F.Supp. 364, 367 (N.D.Ill.1970), aff’d sub nom., Conner v. Richardson, 400 U.S. 1003 , 91 S. Ct. 575 , 27 L.Ed.2d 618 (1971).
cited Cited "see" Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. Buttes Gas & Oil Co.
C.D. Cal. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First National City Bank, 270 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.N.Y.1967), rev’d, 431 F.2d 394 (2nd Cir. 1970), vacated, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971). 35 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Hernandez
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Richardson, [supra, 204 Conn. 663 ]; see also State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 529 , 271 A.2d 74 (1970), cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kiser
Conn. App. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
However, ‘[m]ere speculation that the informant’s information will be helpful to the defense is not sufficient to mandate disclosure . . . .’ State v. Richardson, [supra, 204 Conn. 663 ]; see also State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 529 , 271 A.2d 74 (1970), cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jackson
Conn. App. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Richardson, 204 Conn. 654, 663 , 529 A.2d 1236 (1987); see also State v. Harris, 159 Conn. 521, 529 , 271 A.2d 74 (1970), cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S. Ct. 578 , 27 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Joyner v. Dumpson
S.D.N.Y. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Ramos v. Montgomery, 313 F.Supp. 1179, 1181 (S.D.Cal.1970), aff’d, 400 U.S. 1003 , 91 S.Ct. 572 , 27 L.Ed.2d 618 (1971).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De Cuba v. First National City Bank
1st Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First National City Bank, 270 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.N.Y. 1967), rev’d, 431 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1970), vacated and remanded, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971), on remand, 442 F.2d 530 (2d Cir. 1971), rev'd, 406 U.S. 759 , 92 S.Ct. 1808 , 32 L.Ed.2d 466 (1972), on remand, 478 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1973); Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 193 F.Supp. 375 (S.D.N.Y. 1961), aff'd, 307 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1962), rev’d, 376 U.S. 398 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 , on remand, sub nom.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Banco Nacional De Cuba, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Chase Manhattan Bank, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
2d Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Banco Nacional de *878 Cuba v. First National City Bank, 270 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.N.Y.1967), rev’d, 431 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1970), vacated and remanded, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971), on remand, 442 F.2d 530 (2d Cir. 1971), rev’d 406 U.S. 759 , 92 S.Ct. 1808 , 32 L.Ed.2d 466 (1972), on remand, 478 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1973); Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 193 F.Supp. 375 (S.D.N.Y.1961), aff’d 307 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1962), rev’d 376 U.S. 398 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964), on remand sub nom.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.
2d Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First National City Bank, 270 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.N.Y. 1967), rev’d 431 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1970), vacated and remanded, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971), on remand, 442 F.2d 530 (2d Cir. 1971), rev’d, 406 U.S. 759 , 92 S.Ct. 1808 , 32 L.Ed.2d 466 (1972), on remand, 478 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1973); Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 193 F.Supp. 375 (S.D.N.Y. 1961), aff’d, 307 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1962), rev’d 376 U.S. 398 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964), on remand, sub nom.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." The First National Bank of Boston (International) v. Banco Nacional De Cuba
1st Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First National City Bank, 270 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.N.Y. 1967), rev’d, 431 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1970), vacated and remanded, 400 U.S. 1019 , 91 S.Ct. 581 , 27 L.Ed.2d 630 (1971), on remand, 442 F.2d 530 (2d Cir. 1971), rev’d, 406 U.S. 759 , 92 S.Ct. 1808 , 32 L.Ed.2d 466 (1972), on remand, 478 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1973) (“Banco I”); Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 193 F.Supp. 375 (S.D.N.Y. 1961), aff'd, 307 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1962), rev’d, 376 U.S. 398 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964), on remand, sub nom.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Owens v. Parham
N.D. Ga. · 1972 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ramos v. Montgomery, 313 F.Supp. 1179 (S.D.Cal.1970), aff’d 400 U.S. 1003 , 91 S.Ct. 572 , 27 L.Ed.2d 618 (1971); Bryson v. Burson, 308 F.Supp. 1170 (N.D.Ga.1969).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arizona State Department of Public Welfare v. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Maricopa County Legal Aid Clients v. Arizona State Department of Public Welfare and Department of Health, Education and Welfare
9th Cir. · 1971 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e. g., Ramos v. Montgomery, S.D.Cal., 1970, 313 F.Supp. 1179 , aff'd mem., 1971, 400 U.S. 1003 , 91 S.Ct. 572 , 27 L.Ed.2d 618 . 64 The Secretary's determination that the method used by Arizona to calculate AFDC income disregard is not in conformity with valid federal requirements must be affirmed. 65 3.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Arizona State Department of Public Welfare v. Department of Health, Education & Welfare
9th Cir. · 1971 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e. g., Ramos v. Montgomery, S.D.Cal., 1970, 313 F.Supp. 1179 , aff’d mem., 1971, 400 U.S. 1003 , 91 S.Ct. 572 , 27 L.Ed.2d 618 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harris
v.
Texas
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 15, 1971.
400 U.S. 1003
Cited by 55 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 74%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1)

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Motion of the State of Texas to terminate petitioner’s stay of execution denied. Motion of petitioner that the Court consider his motion for stay of execution as a petition for writ of certiorari granted and case placed on docket as No. 6458.