Atl. City Elec. Co. v. United States, 400 U.S. 73 (1970). · Go Syfert
Search
Atl. City Elec. Co. v. United States, 400 U.S. 73 (1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
129 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Montana Consumer Counsel v. United States (ca9, 1979-08-17) · Strongest negative: Oklahoma Corp. Commission v. United States (oknd, 1974-12-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "but see" Oklahoma Corp. Commission v. United States (3×)
N.D. Okla. · 1974 · signal: but see · confidence high
See Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. United States, 11 F.Supp. 487, 494-495 (E.D.Va.); Florida Citrus Commission v. United States, 144 F.Supp. 517, 524-527 (N.D.Fla.), aff’d, 352 U.S. 1021 , 77 S.Ct. 589 , 1 L.Ed.2d 595 ; SCRAP v. United States, 371 F.Supp. 1291, 1296 (D.D.C.), Probable jurisdiction noted 419 U.S. 822 , 95 S.Ct. 38 , 42 L.Ed.2d 46 (1974); see also North Carolina v. United States, 325 U.S. 507 , 65 S.Ct. 1260 , 89 L.Ed. 1760 ; but see Alabama Power Co. v. United States, 316 F.Supp. 337 (D.D.C.), and Atlantic City Elec tric Co. v. United States, 306 F.Supp. 338 (S.D.N.Y.), both affir…
examined Cited "see" Montana Consumer Counsel v. United States (3×)
9th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United States, 400 U.S. 73 , 91 S.Ct. 259 , 27 L.Ed.2d 212 (1970); Electronic Indus.
examined Cited "see" Montana Consumer Counsel v. United States (3×)
9th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United States, 400 U.S. 73 , 91 S.Ct. 259 , 27 L.Ed.2d 212 (1970); Electronic Indus.
examined Cited "see" Ralph Nader and Reuben B. Robertson, III v. Federal Communications Commission, and the United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, United States Independent Telephone Association, Air Transport Association of America, Telephone Users Association, Inc., and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Intervenors. Microwave Communications, Inc. And MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, and the United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Air Transport Association of America, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Intervenors (3×)
D.C. Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See n. 2 supra 21 The reader may recall that on January 12, 1971, AT&T agreed to postpone the effectiveness of its November 20, 1970 tariff filing and instead filed tariff revisions designed to increase revenues by $250 million 22 Arizona Grocery and the other ICC cases, Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United States, 306 F.Supp. 338 (S.D.N.Y.1969), aff'd by equally divided Court, 400 U.S. 73 , 91 S.Ct. 259 , 27 L.Ed.2d 212 (1970); Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. United States, 11 F.Supp. 487 (E.D.Va.1935), are distinguishable for another reason, the peculiarities of ICC practice.
discussed Cited "see" Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures
SCOTUS · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See 28 U. S. C. §§ 2325 , 2284. 5 E. g., Alabama Power Co. v. United States, 316 F. Supp. 337 (DC 1969), and Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United States, 306 F. Supp. 338 (SDNY 1969), both aff’d by an equally divided court, 400 U. S. 73 (1970); Electronics Industries Assn. v. United States, 310 F. Supp. 1286 (DC 1970), aff’d, 401 U. S. 967 (1971); Florida Citrus Comm’n v. United States, 144 F. Supp. 517 (ND Fla. 1956), aff’d, 352 U. S. 1021 (1957); Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. United States, 11 F. Supp. 487 (ED Va. 1935). 6 Among suspension provisions enacted by Congress since 49 U. S. …
examined Cited "see" Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures v. United States (3×)
D.D.C. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United States, 400 U.S. 73 , 91 S.Ct. 259 , 27 L.Ed.2d 212 (1970).
cited Cited "see" Alabama Power Company v. United States
D.D.C. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See 91 S.Ct. 259 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
78.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 1970.
400 U.S. 73
Per Curiam.
Cited by 23 opinions  |  Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

James O'Malley, Jr., argued the cause for appellants in No. 78. With him on the briefs were Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Walter J. Myskowski, Sheila H. Marshall, and Alfred E. Froh. Charles J. McCarthy argued the cause for appellants in No. 106. With him on the briefs were Arthur L. Winn, Jr., J. Raymond Clark, and Richard J. Hardy.

Deputy Solicitor General Springer argued the cause for the United States et al. in both cases. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Edward M. Shulman, William A. Imhof, Robert W. Ginnane, and Arthur J. Cerra. Hugh B. Cox argued the cause for appellees Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al. in both cases. With him on the brief were William H. Allen and Michael Boudin.

John F. Donelan and John M. Cleary filed a brief in No. 106 for the National Industrial Traffic League as amicus curiae urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

[*] Together with No. 106, Alabama Power Co. et al. v. United States et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.