Eckels v. Ross, 401 U.S. 933 (1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Eckels v. Ross, 401 U.S. 933 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Brown v. Donielson (iasd, 1971-11-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Brown v. Donielson
S.D. Iowa · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Comm, of Investigation, 55 N.J. 249 , 261 A.2d 129 (1970), prob. jur. noted, 401 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 916 , 28 L.Ed.2d 213 (1971) ; Illinois Crime Investigating Comm. v. Sarno, 45 Ill.2d 473 , 259 N.E.2d 267 (1970), cert, granted, 401 U.S. 935 , 91 S.Ct. 918 , 28 L.Ed.2d 214 (1971) ; Piccirillo v. State of New York, cert, den’d, 400 U.S. 548 , 91 S.Ct. 520 , 27 L.Ed.2d 596 (1971) ; In re Kinoy, 326 E.Supp. 407 (S.D.N.Y.1971) ; Stewart v. United States, 440 F.2d 954 (9 Cir. 1971) ; In Matter of Korman, Etc. 449 F.2d 32 (7 Cir. 1971). 2 .
examined Cited "see" United States of America Ex Rel. Gerardo Catena v. Albert Elias, Superintendent of Youth Reception and Correction Center at Yardville, N. J (3×)
3rd Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of Investigation, 401 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 916 , 28 L.Ed.2d 213 (1971).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. James Melvin Wilcox
5th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Ziccarelli v. New Jersey State Comm, of Investigation, 1971, probable jurisdiction noted, 401 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 916 , 28 E.Ed.2d 213 (1971) ; Samo v. Illinois Crime Investigating Comm., 1971, cert, granted, 401 U.S. 935 , 91 S.Ct. 918 , 28 L.Ed.2d 214 ; The Organized Crime Control Act, 1970, 39 L.W. 23 (“use immunity”) ; and Counselman v. Hitchcock, supra (“transactional immunity”) .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eckels
v.
Ross
No. 982.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1971.
401 U.S. 933
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay of modification as required by the Court of Appeals presented to Mr. Justice Black, and by him referred to the Court, denied.