green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Allstate Insurance
See Timmons v. South Carolina Tricentennial Comm’n, 254 S.C. 378 , 175 S.E.2d 805 (1970), appeal dismissed, cert. denied, 400 U.S. 986 , 91 S.Ct. 460 , 27 L.Ed.2d 435 (1971), reh’g denied, 401 U.S. 949 , 91 S.Ct. 922 , 28 L.Ed.2d 233 (1971) (For this Court to reverse a case based on the erroneous admission of evidence, both error and prejudice must be shown.); McKissick v. J.F.
discussed
Cited "see"
Attorney General of the United States v. Covington & Burling
See Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Decker, 423 F.2d 487 (7th Cir. 1970), aff’d mem. by equally divided court, 400 U.S. 955 , 91 S.Ct. 351 , 27 L.Ed.2d 263 , rehearing denied, 401 U.S. 950 , 91 S.Ct. 917 , 28 L.Ed.2d 234 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Potomac Passengers Association v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company and Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company. National Association of Railroad Passengers v. Central of Georgia Railway Company, Southern Railway Company and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
See Ballerina Pen Co. v. Kunzig, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 98 , 102 n. 8, 433 F.2d 1204 , 1208 n. 8 (1970), cert. dismissed, 401 U.S. 950 , 91 S.Ct. 1186 , 28 L.Ed.2d 234 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Potomac Passengers Ass'n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
See Ballerina Pen Co. v. Kunzig, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 98 , 102 n. 8, 433 F.2d 1204 , 1208 n. 8 (1970), cert. dismissed, 401 U.S. 950 , 91 S.Ct. 1186 , 28 L.Ed.2d 234 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Bernard M. Decker, United States District Judge v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.
See 401 U.S. 950 , 91 S.Ct. 917 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert E. McKee, Inc. v. City of Atlanta
The Court of Claims has held that the execution of a general release to the government will not bar the contractor from bringing claims inconsistent with the release, where the parties’ actions subsequent to the release evidence either their understanding that the release does not apply to the claim, or the government’s waiver of the release, Winn-Senter Construction Co. v. United States, 75 F.Supp. 255, 260 , 110 Ct.Cl. 34 (1948); Houdaille Industries v. United *1201 States, 151 F.Supp. 298, 309-10, 138 Ct.Cl. 301 (1957); compare Adler Construction Co. v. United States, 423 F.2d 1362 , 19…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J. H. Rutter Rex Manufacturing Company, Inc., Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross
Miss., 1970); see also Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Decker, 7 Cir. 1970, 423 F.2d 487 , aff’d by equally divided court, 1971, 400 U.S. 348 , 91 S.Ct. 479 , 27 L.Ed.2d 433 , reh. denied, 401 U.S. 950 , 91 S.Ct. 917 , 28 L.Ed.2d 234 ; see generally, Wright & Miller, 8 Federal Practice & Procedure § 2024; and non-department heads, cf. United States v. Morgan, supra, does not preclude the Board from claiming a qualified privilege for its investigative work files.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harper
v.
United States Daegele v. Crouse, Warden Chapman v. United States Hawkins v. Smith Harrison v. Clark County School District Logan v. Casscles, Warden Gilboy v. United States Akers v. United States
v.
United States Daegele v. Crouse, Warden Chapman v. United States Hawkins v. Smith Harrison v. Clark County School District Logan v. Casscles, Warden Gilboy v. United States Akers v. United States
No. 868; No. 5678; No. 5843; No. 6020; No. 6053; No. 6072; No. 6078; No. 6095.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1971.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar