green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
12.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[A] predicate to appel-lee’s right to represent a class is his eligibility to sue in his own right.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"[A] predicate to appellee's right to represent a class is his eligibility to sue in his own right."
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Ginn-LA St. Lucie Ltd., LLLP
in many situations in which the same attorney acts for two or more parties having a common interest, neither party may exercise the privilege in a subsequent controversy with the other.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.
predicate to appel-lee's right to represent a class is his eligibility to sue in his own right.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jules Lusardi Walter N. Hill James Marr, Jr. And John F. Weiss, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated Arthur Brickman Martin J. Cocca Carl B. Heisler Raymond C. Loyer Donald P. Miller Robert C. Patterson Anthony T. Salvatore Eldon Sheldon Michael Sylvestri, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Xerox Corporation, a New York Corporation, Jules Lusardi, Walter N. Hill, James Marr, Jr., John F. Weiss, Arthur Brickman, Martin J. Cocca, Carl B. Heisler, Raymond C. Loyer, Donald P. Miller, Robert C. Patterson, Anthony T. Salvatore, Eldon Sheldon, Michael Sylvestri, Bruce A. Blackie, Richard Vinson, Edward Brough, and Charles L. Meador, No. 91-5846. Jules Lusardi Walter N. Hill James Marr, Jr. And John F. Weiss, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated Arthur Brickman Martin J. Cocca Carl B. Heisler Raymond C. Loyer Donald P. Miller Robert C. Patterson Anthony T. Salvatore Eldon Sheldon Michael Sylvestri, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Xerox Corporation, a New York Corporation, No. 91-5890
predicate to appellee's right to represent a class is his eligibility to sue in his own right.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
King v. Conde
in federal question cases ... federal substantive rights may be compromised if a stringent state rule of evidence is applied.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Multidistrict Vehicle Air Pollution M.D.L. No. 31. State of California v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., Robert Morgan v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City of Philadelphia v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., State of New York v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City of New York v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City and County of Denver v. American Motors Corporation
franchisor
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Kuwait Ports Authority v. Crowell & Moring LLP
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
The rationale behind this rule rested on a “particularized context”: “where the client asserting the privilege is an entity which in the performance of its functions acts wholly or partly in the interests of others, and those others, or some of them, seek access to the subject matter of the communications.” Id. at 1101 (emphasizing that “management does not manage for itself and that the beneficiaries of its actions are the stockholders”).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Symmons v. O'Keeffe
In that case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that while “[a] corporation is not barred from asserting [attorney-client privilege] merely because those demanding information enjoy the status of stockholders,” where a corporation “is in suit against its stockholders on charges of acting inimically to stockholder interests, protection of those interests as well as those of the corporation and of the public require that the availability of the privilege be subject to the right of the stockholders to show why it should not be invoked in the particular instance.�…
cited
Cited "see"
Pgh History v. Ziegler, Appeal of: Ziegler
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Valente v. Pepsico, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 361 (D.Del.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Found. v. Ziegler
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger , 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied , 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) ; Valente v. Pepsico, Inc. , 68 F.R.D. 361 (D.Del.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Pgh History v. Ziegler, Appeal of: Hoffstot
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Valente v. Pepsico, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 361 (D.Del.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Pgh History v. Ziegler, Appeal of: Ziegler
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Valente v. Pepsico, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 361 (D.Del.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Refco Inc.
See generally Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1103-04 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) (holding that attorney-client privilege may be asserted by corporation against those for whom it acts as fiduciary, subject to right of such beneficiaries to show cause why it should not be invoked in the particular instance).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Perrigo Company
(2×)
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Fausek v. White, 965 F.2d 126 (6th Cir.) (extending Gamer beyond shareholder derivative suit), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Opus Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
See, Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1103-04 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); In re ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Braniff, Inc.
See, Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas A.J. Fausek v. Robert E. White, Selox, Inc.
See In Re Antitrust Grand Jury, 805 F.2d 155, 162 (6th Cir.1986) (“All reasons for the attorney-client privilege are completely eviscerated when a client consults an attorney not for advice on past misconduct, but for legal assistance in carrying out a contemplated or ongoing crime or fraud.”) It has been settled law since Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971), that a corporation may claim an attorney-client privilege to prevent an attorney from testifying about confidential communications with the corporati…
cited
Cited "see"
Ramos v. Patrician Equities Corp.
See, Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 734-37 (3d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Erickson v. State
See Parkin v. State, 238 So.2d 817, 820-22 (Fla. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1189 , 28 L.Ed.2d 322 (1971); McMunn v. State, 264 So.2d 868, 870 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Petty Ex Rel. Kauffman
See Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 734 (3rd Cir.1970) (“A plaintiff who is unable to secure standing for himself is certainly not in a position to ‘fairly ensure the adequate representation’ of those alleged to be similarly situated.”), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); see generally Note, Class Standing and the Class Representative, 94 Harv.L.Rev. 1637 (1981) and Note, Organizational Representation Suits: Labor Unions May Attack Employment Discrimination Without Having to Meet Rule 23 Requirements, 53 Ind.L.J. 113 (1977) (both discussin…
discussed
Cited "see"
DeMasi v. Weiss
Katz, 496 F.2d at 752 ; see Interpace Corp. v. City of Philadelphia, 438 F.2d 401 (3d Cir. 1971). 6 Cf. Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 734 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) (class certification reversed in 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b) appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rocco J. Demasi, M.D., the 96 Other Subpoenaed Witnesses Identified in Exhibit a Hereto, Gary Ardison, M.D., Thomas L. Bauer, M.D., Ivan L. Butler, M.D., S. W. Deisher, M.D., Jack A. Kline, M.D., Lois Kushner, M.D., S. Philip Laucks, M.D., Harold H. MacDougall M.D., Iain L. McKenzie M.D., John P. Whiteley, M.D., the York Hospital, and the Medical and Dental Staff of the York Hospital, No. 81-2171 v. Malcolm Weiss, and Honorable Malcolm Muir, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Nominal Gary Ardison, M.D., Thomas L. Bauer, M.D., Ivan L. Butler, M.D., S. W. Deisher, M.D., Jack A. Kline, M.D., Lois Kushner, M.D., S. Philip Laucks, M.D., Harold H. MacDougall M.D., Iain L. McKenzie M.D., John P. Whiteley, M.D., the York Hospital, and the Medical and Dental Staff of the York Hospital, No. 81-2192 v. Malcolm Weiss, Honorable Malcolm Muir, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Nominal
Katz, 496 F.2d at 752 ; see Interpace Corp. v. City of Philadelphia, 438 F.2d 401 (3d Cir. 1971). 6 Cf. Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 734 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) (class certification reversed in 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b) appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re LTV Securities Litigation
See, Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., 80 F.R.D. 718 (N.D.Ill.1978); Cohen v. Uniroyal, Inc., 80 F.R.D. 480 (E.D.Pa.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnesee v. Stop & Shop Cos., Inc.
See Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F. 2d 727, 732 (3 Cir.1970), cert. den. 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed. 2d 323 (1971); Schaffer v. Universal Rundle Corp., 397 F. 2d 893, 896 (5 Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doyle v. Union Insurance
(2×)
See, Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F. 2d 1093 (5th Cir., 1970), cert. den. 401 U. S. 974 , 91 S. Ct. 1191 , 28 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re King Resources Co. Securities Litigation
See Kauffman *618 v. Dreyfus, Inc., 434 F.2d 727 (3rd Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Cohen v. Beneficial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949).
cited
Cited "see"
Tri-County State Bank v. Hertz
See Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 734 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
J. P. Foley & Co. v. Vanderbilt
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) ; Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1962) ; Fed.R.Evid. 501, Advisory Committee’s Note. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hayes v. Pennsylvania Lawn Products, Inc.
Co., 424 F.2d 1064 (3d Cir. 1970); see Eulo v. Deval Aerodynamics, Inc., 47 F.R.D. 35, 44 (E.D.Pa.1969), rev’d on other grounds, 430 F.2d 325 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); 5A J.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Canton Sign Company
See G.P.D., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 430 F.2d 963, 964 (6th Cir. 1970) cert. denied 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1193 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 ; N.L.R.B. v. Lou DeYoung's Market Basket, 430 F.2d 912, 915 (6th Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Canton Sign Co.
See G.P.D., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 430 F.2d 963, 964 (6th Cir. 1970) cert. denied 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1193 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 ; N.L.R.B. v. Lou DeYoung’s Market Basket, 430 F.2d 912, 915 (6th Cir. 1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Baker v. F & F INVESTMENT
See Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.
Alabama By-Products Corp. v. Cede & Co., 657 A.2d 254, 265-66 (Del.1995) (emphasis added) (citing Anderson, 477 A.2d at 1047 ); see also Schilling v. Belcher, 582 F.2d 995, 1002 (5th Cir.1978) ("Standing is justified only by this proprietary interest created by the stockholder relationship and the possible indirect benefits the nominal plaintiff may acquire qua stockholder of the corporation which is the real party in interest.") (emphasis added) (quoting Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 735-36 (3d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971)); Por…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Samaritan Foundation v. Superior Court
See, e.g., Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1103-04 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) (finding that the privilege may be overcome by a showing of good cause in shareholder derivative suits); Aguinaga v. John Morrell & Co., 112 F.R.D. 671, 681 (D.C.Kan.1986) (holding that the privilege may be overcome by a showing of good cause in the effort by union members to discover communications between lawyers and officers who allegedly betrayed union); Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia v. Steamship Mount Dirfys, 537 F.Supp. 55, 56 (E.D.N.C.1981) (explai…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pepe v. GMAC
See, e.g., Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F. 2d 727, 732 (3d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed. 2d 323 (1971); Ash v. I.B.M., 353 F. 2d 491 , 493- 494 (3d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 927 , 86 S.Ct. 1446 , 16 L.Ed. 2d 531 (1966); Loeb v. Eastman Kodak Co., 183 F. 704, 709 (3d Cir.1910).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. Valley National Bank
See, e.g., Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1103 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Quintel Corp., N.V. v. Citibank, N.A., 567 F.Supp. 1357, 1364 (S.D.N.Y.1983); 2 Weinstein’s Evidence, supra, ¶ 503(d)(5)[01] at 503-74 to 75; Sup.Ct.Stan. 503(d)(5).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parts and Electric Motors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Sterling Electric, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Compare General Foam, 695 F.2d at 288 (reversing judgment n.o.v. but upholding determination that jury verdict “was against the clear weight of the evidence”) with Eulo v. Deval Aerodynamics, Inc., 430 F.2d 325 (3rd Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) (reversing district court’s decision to grant new trial for supposed errors in jury instructions).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Angel Music, Inc. v. ABC Sports, Inc.
See also Chevalier v. Baird Savings Association, 66 F.R.D. 105 (E.D.Pa.1975) (Mortgagors had no standing to bring a class action against a class of all savings and loan associations and building and loan associations in the jurisdiction where named plaintiffs had not dealt with several members of the defendant class). 3 Similarly, the Third Circuit in Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727 (3d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) denied the named plaintiff, a shareholder in four mutual funds, the right to bring a class action against sixty-five mu…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Diasonics Securities Litigation
See also Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1103 (5th Cir.) (1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. MacIas
McIntyre; see also Parkin v. State, 238 So.2d 817 (Fla. 1970) (every person is presumed capable of controlling his actions and of being held responsible for them), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1189 , 28 L.Ed.2d 322 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tony Davis BALLARD, Defendant-Appellant
See e.g., Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 , 1102 (5th Cir.1970), ce rt. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 680 F.2d 1026, 1028-29 (5th Cir.1982); In re Sealed Case, 754 F.2d 395, 399, 400 (D.C.Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Yohn v. State
See also, Parkin v. State, 238 So.2d 817 (Fla. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1189 , 28 L.Ed.2d 322 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Mallick v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
But cf. Flaherty v. Warehousemen, Garage & Service Station Employees' Local Union No. 334, 574 F.2d 484, 486 (9th Cir.1978) (per curiam) 33 See 5 Smith, Fletcher Cyclopedia of the Law of Private Corporations Sec. 2239.1 (perm. ed. 1976 & 1984 Supp.); see also supra note 21 34 Cf. Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1100-04 (5th Cir.1970) (listing factual inquiries relevant to "balancing of interests" in determining whether shareholder may inspect attorney-corporation correspondence), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,023, 8 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 475 Pauline Weil and Emanuel J. Weil, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Investment/indicators, Research and Management, Inc., Desmond W. Mitchell, Charles R. Schwab, Robert Birkie, John Hossfeld, Marjorie A. Wegner and Laurel Brook Farms, Inc.
See, e. g., Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 , 1097 & n.10 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); United States v. Bartone, 400 F.2d 459, 461 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1027 , 89 S.Ct. 631 , 21 L.Ed.2d 571 (1969); Radiant Burners, Inc. v. American Gas Ass'n, 320 F.2d 314, 322-23 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 929 , 84 S.Ct. 330 , 11 L.Ed.2d 262 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weil v. Investment/Indicators, Research & Management, Inc.
See, e. g., Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 , 1097 & n.10 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); United States v. Bartone, 400 F.2d 459, 461 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1027 , 89 S.Ct. 631 , 21 L.Ed.2d 571 (1969); Radiant Burners, Inc. v. American Gas Ass’n, 320 F.2d 314, 322-23 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 929 , 84 S.Ct. 330 , 11 L.Ed.2d 262 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diego MAS MARQUES, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, and Digital Equipment GmbH, Defendants, Appellees
See also Farkas v. Texas Instruments, Inc., 429 F.2d 849, 850 (1st Cir 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1193 , 28 L.Ed.2d 324 (1971); Wilson v. Holiday Inn Curacao, NV, 322 F.Supp. 1052, 1054 (D.Mass.1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilder v. Bernstein
See, e. g., Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971) (securities action attempting to combine stockholder derivative class actions under Rule 23.1, Fed.R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garrity v. Thomson
See also Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093, 1098-1100 (5th Cir. 1970), cert, denied, sub nom., Garner v. First American Life Insurance Company, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air Force
(2×)
See, e. g., Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 , 1096 n.7 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1191 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Schwimmer v. United States, 232 F.2d 855, 863 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 833 , 77 S.Ct. 48 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1956); 8 in 1 Pet Products, Inc. v. Swift & Co., 218 F.Supp. 253 (S.D.N.Y.1963); United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., supra; 8 Wigmore on Evidence § 2320 (McNaughton rev. 1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Haas v. Pittsburgh National Bank
See also Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Leonard v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 64 F.R.D. 432, 434-35 (S.D.N.Y.1974). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Parkin
v.
Florida
v.
Florida
No. 878.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1971.
Published
Sup. Ct. Fla. Certi-orari denied.