green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Maryland Casualty Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co.
See Vernitron Corp. v. Benjamin, 440 F.2d 105, 108 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1664 , 29 L.Ed.2d 154 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burns Scott Howard v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
See Petition of United States Steel Corp., 436 F.2d 1256 (6th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1649 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971) and Bach v. Penn Central Transportation Co., 502 F.2d 1117 (6th Cir.1974), where this court indicated that testimony projecting significant wage increases far into the future is so speculative as to be inadmissible.
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Gallagher
See Vernitron Corp. v. Benjamin, 440 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1664 , 29 L.Ed.2d 154 (1971), in which we vacated a district court order enjoining the appeal of a state action pending the outcome of a federal securities case, holding that the “doctrine of collateral estoppel [issue preclusion] would be applied in any instance where the state court had determined a factual issue arising in a subsequent federal litigation.” Id. at 108.
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Gallagher
See Vernitron Corp. v. Benjamin, 440 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1664 , 29 L.Ed.2d 154 (1971), in which we vacated a district court order enjoining the appeal of a state action pending the outcome of a federal securities case, holding that the "doctrine of collateral estoppel [issue preclusion] would be applied in any instance where the state court had determined a factual issue arising in a subsequent federal litigation." Id. at 108.
discussed
Cited "see"
Drayton v. Jiffee Chemical Corporation
See 523 F.2d at 109 14 See Petition of United States Steel Corp. (I), 436 F.2d 1256 (6th Cir. 1970), Cert. denied, 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1649 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971) 15 Whether the rule in United States Steel regarding non-treating doctors is altered by new Federal Rule of Evidence 703 is an issue we need not decide here, since the trial in the instant case occurred prior to the effective date of the Rules See also Fed.R.Evid. 803(4) and Advisory Committee Note thereto; 3 & 4 Weinstein's Evidence P 703(03) at 703-16 to -17, P 803(4)(01) at 803-124 to -125 (1977). 16 Thus as an illustration o…
cited
Cited "see"
Drayton v. Jiffee Chemical Corp.
See Petition of United States Steel Corp. (I), 436 F.2d 1256 (6th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1649 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971). .
discussed
Cited "see"
District of Columbia v. Gueory
Cameron v. Johnson, 390 U.S. 611, 617 , 88 S.Ct. 1335 , 20 *838 L.Ed.2d 182 (1968); United States v. O' Brien, supra, 391 U.S. at 376 , 88 S.Ct. 1673 ; Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, supra, 315 U.S. at 574 , 62 S.Ct. 766 ; see Wisconsin v. Eisenberg, 48 Wis.2d 364 , 180 N.W.2d 529 , cert. denied, 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1669 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
District of Columbia v. Gueory
Cameron v. Johnson, 390 U.S. 611, 617 , 88 S.Ct. 1335 , 20 L.Ed.2d 182 (1968); United States v. O’ Brien, supra, 391 U.S. at 376 , 88 S.Ct. 1673 ; Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, supra, 315 U.S. at 574 , 62 S.Ct. 766 ; see Wisconsin v. Eisenberg, 48 Wis.2d 364 , 180 N.W.2d 529 , cert. denied, 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1669 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Jerome Siegel and Joseph Shuster v. National Periodical Publications, Inc.
See Vernitron Corp. v. Benjamin, 440 F.2d 105, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1664 , 29 L.Ed.2d 154 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salvatore Anthony Ferraioli
See United States v. Evans, 425 F.2d 302, 304 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1648 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971); Uffelman v. United States, 230 F.2d 297, 303-304 (9th Cir. 1956); see also United States v. Nugent, supra. Finally, we note that appellant’s invocation of Greene v. McElroy, 360 U.S. 474 , 79 S.Ct. 1400 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1959) is without merit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Halperin
See United States v. Williams, 69 Cr. 266 (Murphy, J.), aff’d without opinion, (2d Cir. Dec. 10, 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1677 , 29 L.Ed.2d 152 (1971); Williams v. United States, 334 *557 F.Supp. 669 (S.D.N.Y.1971) (Weinfeld, J.), aff’d, 463 F.2d 1183 (2d Cir. 1972) (per curiam); 72 Civ. 5118 (S.D.N.Y.
cited
Cited "see"
Stephen Robley Evans v. John Mitchell, Attorney General of the United States
See United States v. Evans, 425 F.2d 302 (9th Cir. 1970), petition for rehearing denied January 5, 1971, cert. den. 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1648 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Curry v. United States
See Petition of United States Steel Corporation, 436 F.2d 1256, 1275 (6th Cir. 1970), cert. den., Fuhrman v. United States Steel Corp., 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1660 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971), reh. den., Lamp v. United States Steel Corp., 403 U.S. 940 , 91 S.Ct. 2247 , 29 L.Ed.2d 720 (1971); Petition of Oskar Tiedemann and Company, 236 F.Supp. 895, 905 (D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Oglebay Norton Company, Cross-Appellee v. Csx Corporation, Cross-Appellant
See also Petition of United States Steel Corp., 436 F.2d 1256 (6th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1649 , 29 L.Ed.2d 720 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. United States
See also Petition of United States Steel Corp. 436 F.2d 1256, 1275-76 (6th Cir.1970) (award for pain and suffering appropriate where decedents were last observed performing duties below deck and court could infer that they were conscious at time they drowned), cert. denied, *404 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1649 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971); Petition of Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A ., 248 F.Supp. 15, 28 (S.D.N.Y.1965) (award for pain and suffering proper where decedents last seen on deck of sinking tug), aff’d in relevant part, 364 F.2d 118 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1005 , 87 S.Ct. 710 , 17 L.Ed.2…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trans World Corp. v. Odyssey Partners
The explicit wording of § 2283 itself implies as much, and the fundamental principle of a dual system of courts leads inevitably to that conclusion.” Id. at 297, 90 S.Ct. at 1748 ; see also Vernitron Corp. v. Benjamin, 440 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1664 , 29 L.Ed.2d 154 (1971); Jacobs v. Tenney, 321 F.Supp. 937 (S.D.N.Y.1970). 5 *1315 Moreover, we find persuasive the argument that Trans World’s present attempt to prevent Odyssey from obtaining Trans World’s stockholders list is the practical equivalent of a request for a preliminary injunction solely on t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Serra
See also Petition of United States Steel Corp., 436 F.2d 1256 (6th Cir. 1970), cert. denied sub nom., Lamp v. United States Steel Corp., 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1649 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971) (seaman’s death and injury action). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Janet R. Johnson, Trustee v. Richard Serra, and Milgo Industrial, Inc., a Corporation, and Milgo Art(s) Systems, Inc., and Third-Party v. Pratt's Express Company, Third-Party
See also Petition of United States Steel Corp., 436 F.2d 1256 (6th Cir. 1970), Cert. denied sub nom., Lamp v. United States Steel Corp., 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1649 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971) (seaman's death and injury action) 17 In Bach, a FELA death case, the district court excluded testimony by an economist estimating the loss in future income resulting from a railroad fireman's death.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barbara A. Green, as Administratrix and Personal Representative of the Estate of Michael Ray Green, Deceased, Etc. v. Harry J. Ross
See, e. g., United States Steel Corp. v. Lamp, 436 F.2d 1256, 1278-1279 (6th Cir. 1970), cert. denied 402 U.S. 987 , 91 S.Ct. 1649 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971) ; Dennis v. Central Gulf Steamship Corp., 323 F.Supp. 943, 946-948 (E.D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 6502.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1971.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.