Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.R., 402 U.S. 996 (1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.R., 402 U.S. 996 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
56 citation events across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Henry (nysd, 1994-08-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Henry
S.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kimball v. United States, 437 F.2d 921, 923 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 996 , 91 S.Ct. 2181 , 29 L.Ed.2d 162 (1971); Stewart v. United States, 395 F.2d 484, 490 (8th Cir.1968); L.
cited Cited "see" Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Interstate Commerce Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chicago, R.I. & P.R.R. v. Chicago, B. & Q.R.R., 437 F.2d 6 , 10 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 996 , 91 S.Ct. 2173 , 29 L.Ed.2d 161 (1971). .
cited Cited "see" Brotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers v. Interstate Commerce Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chicago, R.I. & P.R.R. v. Chicago, B. & Q.R.R., 437 F.2d 6 , 10 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 996 , 91 S.Ct. 2173 , 29 L.Ed.2d 161 (1971) 4 See 49 U.S.C.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Zemek
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Kozak, 438 F.2d 1062 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 996 , 91 S.Ct. 2180 , 29 L.Ed.2d 162 (1971).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Zemek
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Kozak, 438 F.2d 1062 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 996 , 91 S.Ct. 2180 , 29 L.Ed.2d 162 (1971).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hightower v. Harris
N.D. Ill. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Co. v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co., 437 F.2d 6, 9 (7th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 996 , 91 S.Ct. 2173 , 29 L.Ed.2d 161 (1971) (indemnity clause encouraging indemnitee’s carelessness would be contrary to concern for public welfare and policy); Bates, 33 Ill.Dec. 742 , 397 N.E.2d at 78 (indemnification should not provide disincentive to take steps to ensure public safety). .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Eugene J. Rutter, Counter-Defendants v. Arlington Park Jockey Club, Counter-Plaintiff, Arlington Park Jockey Club, Third-Party v. Tracey Bougan, Third-Party
3rd Cir. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Chicago R.I. & P.R.R. v. Chicago, B. & Q.R.R., 7 Cir., 437 F.2d 6 , cert. denied, 402 U.S. 996 , 91 S.Ct. 2173 , 29 L.Ed.2d 161 (1971)
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.
v.
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.
No. 1566.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 24, 1971.
402 U.S. 996
Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.