green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.0 score
“no entrapment exists 'if the accused is ready and willing to commit the crime whenever the opportunity might be afforded”
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. LeBlanc
no entrapment exists 'if the accused is ready and willing to commit the crime whenever the opportunity might be afforded
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fluitt
See In re Grand Jury Proc., 517 F.2d 666 , 669–70 (5th Cir. 1975) (quoting United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1327 (5th Cir. 1970) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 (1971)).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sua
See United States v. Smalls, 438 F.2d 711 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2261 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Sickich
See United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317 (5th Cir.1970), ce rt. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971)(defendant who chaEenged guilty pleas as not knowingly or intelligently made waived attomey-cHent privüege); Lewis v. State, 565 P.2d 846 , 850 n. 4 (Alaska 1977) (“Lewis waived the privilege with respect to his discussions with [counsel] by filing the motion which on its face put in issue what advice he did or did not receive from [counsel].”); State v. Pam, 31 Wash.App. 692, 695 , 644 P.2d 722, 723 (1982), rev’d an other grounds, 101 Wash.2d 507 , 680 P.2d 762…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Foreman
See United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1328-29 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 (1971). 24 Foreman pled guilty to violating 21 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bobby Cochran, A/K/A \Sundance\"
See United States v. Groessel, 440 F.2d 602, 606 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2263 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Pam
See United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1322 (5th Cir. 1970) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 29 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,023, 8 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 475 Pauline Weil and Emanuel J. Weil, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Investment/indicators, Research and Management, Inc., Desmond W. Mitchell, Charles R. Schwab, Robert Birkie, John Hossfeld, Marjorie A. Wegner and Laurel Brook Farms, Inc.
Wigmore, supra, at 636; accord United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. 1970) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971); McCormick, supra, at 194. 21 Appellees contend that the Fund cannot be found to have waived its attorney-client privilege because it did not intend waiver when it made the disclosure.
discussed
Cited "see"
Odell Hargrow Hill v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.
See United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1328-29 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971). *206 In this case, Hill was informed of the potential sentence ranges under the new Penal Code.
cited
Cited "see"
Weil v. Investment/Indicators, Research & Management, Inc.
Wigmore, supra, at 636; accord United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. 1970) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971); McCormick, supra, at 194.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glen D. Graves, Lewis Weinstein, and Graves Construction Company, Inc., A/K/A Graves Construction, Inc.
See United States v. Groessel, 440 F.2d 602 n. 1 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2263 , 29 L.Ed.2d 713 (1971), citing Sherman v. United States, 356 U.S. 369, 373-74 , 78 S.Ct. 819 , 2 L.Ed.2d 848 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marcus Monteiro Albuquerque and Thomas Vincent Radice
(2×)
See United States v. Golembiewski, 437 F.2d 1212 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2260 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
LENNON
In other statutes having the same objective, Congress has treated the term "marihuana" as including cannabis resin. 21 U.S.C. 802(15); Act of August 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 565; Act of July 18, 1956, ch. 629, §106, 70 Stat. 570 ; see United States v. Piercefield, 437 F.2d 1188 (C.A. 5, 1971), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 (1971); United States v. Cepelis, 426 F.2d 134 (C.A. 9, 1970), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 846 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Matthews
(2×)
See State v. Howe, 182 N.W.2d 658 (N.D.1970), cert. denied sub nom., Howe v. North Dakota, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2261 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Succession of Smith v. Kavanaugh, Pierson & Talley
See also United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971); State v. Aucoin, 362 So.2d 503, 505-6 (La.1978) (quoting 8 Wigmore, supra, § 2388 (3), at 855).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Burlington Northern, Inc., Burlington Northern Railroad Co., Union Pacific Corp., Union Pacific Railroad Co., Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc., Kansas City Southern Railway Co. & Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
See, e.g., United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324-26 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Burlington Northern, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324-26 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Continental Illinois Securities Litigation. Appeal of Continental Illinois Corp. & Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. Of Chicago
See e.g., United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971); United States v. Mierzwicki, 500 F.Supp. 1331, 1335 (D.Md.1980) 21 On our reading, very little of the Report strikes us as materially damaging to Continental.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Continental Illinois Securities Litigation
See e.g., United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971); United States v. Mierzwicki, 500 F.Supp. 1331, 1335 (D.Md.1980). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso Company
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Woodall, 438 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. 1970) (en banc), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2262 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,385 United States of America v. Sidney Stein and Security Underwriting Consultants, Inc.
See also United States v. Smalls, 438 F.2d 711, 713 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 933 , 91 S.Ct. 2261 , 29 L.Ed.2d 712 (1971) (inability of government’s witnesses to recall details goes to weight of testimony).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Summers
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 6703.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 1971.
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Appeals Court (1)
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.