green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rotblut v. BEN HUR MOVING AND STORAGE, INC.
See Colligan v. Activities Club of N.Y., Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Bangkok Crafts Corp. v. Capitolo di San Pietro in Vaticano, No. 03 Civ. 0015, 2005 WL 1595285 , at *5 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
Conte Bros. Automotive, Inc. v. Quaker State-Slick 50, Inc.
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 (2d Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Barrus v. Sylvania, 55 F.3d 468 (9th Cir.1995) (same); Dovenmuehle v. Gilldorn Mortgage Midwest Corp., 871 F.2d 697 (7th Cir.1989) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 98-5136
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 (2d Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Barrus v. Sylvania, 55 F.3d 468 (9th Cir.1995) (same); Dovenmuehle v. Gilldorn Mortgage Midwest Corp., 871 F.2d 697 (7th Cir.1989) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Roxas v. Marcos
See Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 446 F.2d 90, 105 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 564 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hernan RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
See United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050, 1056 (9th Cir.) (it's "crucial to a determination of taint" that police didn't suspect the defendant of the crime for which their illegal activity produced evidence), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Durham v. United States, 403 F.2d 190, 196 (9th Cir.1968) ("The price is too high and the advantage too uncertain to make it reasonable to suppose that law enforcement officers will be encouraged to indulge in unlawful searches, knowing that what they find will be suppressed, in the hope of obtaining admissible evidence…
cited
Cited "see"
ca3 1993
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Serbin v. Ziebart International Corp.
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
West Indian Sea Island Cotton Ass'n v. Threadtex, Inc.
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shonac Corp. v. AMKO International, Inc.
Although the legislative history of the Lanham Act is fairly extensive, the history *926 of § 43 is very limited, and “[congressional hearings and committee reports contain little which would add to the understanding of the specific scope or purpose of Section 43(a).” Bauer, A Federal Law of Unfair Competition: What should Be The Reach of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act?, 31 UCLA L.Rev. 671, 680 (1984); accord Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 689-90 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Richardson-Vicks, Inc.
See Colli-gan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 , 692 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bear Creek Productions, Inc. v. Saleh
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); In re “Agent Orange”Product Liability Litigation, 475 F.Supp. 928, 934 (E.D.N.Y.1979). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Camel Hair and Cashmere Institute of America, Inc. v. Associated Dry Goods Corporation, D/B/A Lord & Taylor
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 80 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Smith v. Montoro, 648 F.2d 602, 607 (9th Cir.1981); Thorn v. Reliance Van Co., Inc., 736 F.2d 929, 933 (3rd Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson Medical Company, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971) (Section 43(a)'s grant of standing to "any person who believes that he is or is likely to be damaged” does not extend to consumers). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bolin
See Kansas City v. Henderson, 468 S.W.2d 48, 53-54 (Mo.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 570 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Carty v. Health-Chem Corp.
See Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur, 446 F.2d 90 , 106 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 564 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 (1971) (venue proper in district where act complained of was publication of news releases printed in newspaper transmitted to forum by mail); Texas Gulf Sulphur v. Ritter, 371 F.2d 145 , 148-49 (10th Cir.1967) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Springs Mills, Inc. v. Ultracashmere House, Ltd.
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971) (denying a right of action to consumers under Section 1125(a)). 28 There are two bases for liability under Section 1125(a): false description and false association.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey Thomas Schmidt, United States of America v. Donald Joseph Schmidt, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050, 1057 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ali Asghar Taheri
See the discussion in United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971), in which a later investigation uncovered separate evidence of a different crime.
cited
Cited "see"
American General Insurance v. Equitable General Corp.
See Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 446 F.2d 90, 104-6 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 564 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Pennwalt Corp. v. Plough, Inc.
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692-94 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, and Charles Edward Gent, Jr.
See United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Lawton v. Dacey, 352 F.2d 61 (1st Cir. 1965). *489 Appellant Gent also complains that the government should have been barred from introducing the daytimers, because he was not provided with copies of them prior to trial.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. A. C. Pacee
See United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050, 1055-57 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Eugene Hickman, United States of America v. Thomas Henry Landers
(2×)
See United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050, 1056-57 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Noone v. Banner Talent Associates, Inc.
See Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686 , 691-92 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Nor *263 man M.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Garcia, Jr., T/n, Jose Martinez-Lopez
Allen v. Cupp, supra, 426 F.2d at 759 ; see United States v. Bacall, 443 F.2d 1050, 1057 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 565 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,496 Richard J. Sargent v. Genesco, Inc.
(2×)
See Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 446 F.2d 90 , 100 (10th Cir.) cert. denied 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 564 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 (1971), rehearing denied, 404 U.S. 1064 , 92 S.Ct. 734 , 30 L.Ed.2d 754 (1972); and Texas Continental Life Insurance Co. v. Bankers Bond Co., 307 F.2d 242, 249 (6th Cir. 1962). 12 In Herpich v. Wallace, 430 F.2d 792 (5th Cir. 1970) this court took note of the privity requirement by pointing out that it had been at first 'suggested' and then abandoned in the second circuit, but did not reach the issue.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Goham
See State v. Goham (1971), 187 Neb. 34 , 187 N. W. 2d 305 , cert. den. 404 U. S. 1004 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gould v. American Hawaiian Steamship Company
See generally Moses v. Burgin, 445 F.2d 369, 384 (1st Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 994 , 92 S.Ct. 532 , 30 L.Ed.2d 547 (1971) and Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 446 F.2d 90 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 564 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seven-Up Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.
See also Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd., 442 F.2d 686, 692 (2d Cir.) (“The Act's purpose, as defined in § 45, is exclusively to protect the interests of a purely commercial class against unscrupulous commercial conduct.”), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
210 East 86th Street Corp. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.
See, e.g., Colligan v. Activities Club, 442 F.2d 686 , 692-93 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Castrol Inc. v. Pennzoil Company and Pennzoil Products Company
(2×)
Instead, the statute provides a private remedy to a commercial plaintiff who meets the burden of proving that its commercial interests have been harmed by a competitor’s false advertising.” Id. at 230 (citations omitted); see also Colligan v. Activities Club, 442 F.2d 686 , 692 (2d Cir.1971) (“The Act’s purpose, as defined in § 45, is exclusively to protect the interests of a purely commercial class against unscrupulous commercial conduct.”), cer t. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971); Joseph P. Bauer, A Federal Law of Unfair Competition: What Should be the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tracy v. Skate Key, Inc.
Compare Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, 442 F.2d 686 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 559 , 30 L.Ed.2d 557 (1971) (consumers have no standing to allege Lanham Act violations) with Smith v. Montoro, 648 F.2d 602, 608 (9th Cir.1981) (movie actor whose name was replaced on list of credits for movie has standing); see also 1A Call-mann, Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, § 5.04 at 23 (4th Ed. and 1988 supp.); Murray v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 844 F.2d 988, 995 (2nd Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burton Schultz v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Incomco, Inc. And Philip M. Smith
See, e.g., Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 446 F.2d 90, 104-06 (10th Cir.) (where investors sold stock in reliance on misleading press release, measure of damages is highest price of stock during a reasonable period (between 9 and 17 days) after investors learned of wrong and should have reinvested had they desired to), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 564 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 (1971); Nephi Processing Plant v. Talbott, 247 F.2d 771, 774 (10th Cir.1957) (turkeys sold at wrong time in breach of binding instructions to sell at a later date); In re Schuyler, Chadwick & Burnham, 63 F.2d 241, …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Arnold B. ELKIND, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. LIGGETT & MYERS, INC., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See, e. g., Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 446 F.2d 90 , 104-06 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 564 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,723 Jerry D. Fridrich v. J. C. Bradford
(2×)
See, e. g., Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Company, 446 F.2d 90 , 97 (10th Cir. 1971) cert. denied 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 564 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 ; 405 U.S. 918 , 92 S.Ct. 943 , 30 L.Ed.2d 788 (1972), A. Bromberg, Securities Law: Fraud SEC Rule 10b-5, § 2.4(1)(2) at 30 (1960) (hereinafter Bromberg).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. SMITH, BARNEY & CO., INCORPORATED
See e. g., Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulfur Company, 446 F.2d 90 , 103 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1004 , 92 S.Ct. 564 , 30 L.Ed.2d 558 (1971) and 405 U.S. 918 , 92 S.Ct. 943 , 30 L.Ed.2d 788 (1972); City National Bank v. Vanderboom, 422 F.2d 221, 230-231 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 905 , 90 S.Ct. 2196 , 26 L.Ed.2d 560 (1970); Clement A. Evans & Co. v. McAlpine, 434 F.2d 100, 104 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988 , 91 S.Ct. 1660 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971); Myzel v. Fields, 386 F.2d 718, 735-736 (8th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 951 , 88 S.Ct. 1043 , 19 L.Ed.2d 114…
Kershaw
v.
Tennessee
v.
Tennessee
No. 71-339.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 20, 1971.
Published
Sup. Ct. Tenn. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Cer-tiorari denied.