Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns Int'l Sec. Servs., Inc., 404 U.S. 822 (1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns Int'l Sec. Servs., Inc., 404 U.S. 822 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nosker v. Trinity Land Co. (nmctapp, 1988-04-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Nosker v. Trinity Land Co.
N.M. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See O’Dell v. Garrett, 82 N.M. 240 , 478 P.2d 568 (Ct.App.1970), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 822 , 92 S.Ct. 43 , 30 L.Ed.2d 50 (1971) (since neither title nor right to possession of United States bonds were in plaintiff, his action in conversion was not maintainable); Kruger v. Horton, 106 Wash.2d 738 , 725 P.2d 417 (1986) (en banc) (absent express reservation to retain interest in timber, vendors did not have right to possession and could not maintain an action for conversion).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Adams v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. McVean, 436 F.2d 1120 , 1122 (5 Cir.1971), cert. den. 404 U.S. 822 , 92 S.Ct. 45 , 30 L.Ed.2d 50 (1971); United States v. Gargan, 314 F.Supp. 414, 417 (W.D.Wis. 1970); People v. Hoiland, 22 Cal.App.3d 530 , 99 Cal.Rptr. 523 (Ct.App.1971)." 120 N.J.Super. at 510-11 , 295 A.2d at 203 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Geelan
8th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. McVean, 436 F.2d 1120 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 822 , 92 S.Ct. 45 , 30 L.Ed.2d 50 (1971); United States v. Tantash, 409 F.2d 227 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 968 , 89 S.Ct. 211 , 23 L.Ed.2d 754 (1969); George v. United States, 196 F.2d 445 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 843 , 73 S.Ct. 58 , 97 L.Ed. 656 (1952); United States v. Waddy, 340 F.Supp. 509 (S.D.N.Y. 1971); United States v. Deardorff, 343 F.Supp. 1033 (S.D.N.Y.1971); United States v. Gargan, 314 F.Supp. 414 (W.D.Wis.1970), aff'd sub nom.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Frank Anthony Ware
9th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. McVean, 436 F.2d 1120 , 1122 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 822 , 92 S.Ct. 45 , 30 L.Ed.2d 50 (1971).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. STEWART
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1972 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States *511 v. McVean, 436 F. 2d 1120 , 1122 (5 Cir.1971), cert. den. 404 U.S. 822 , 92 S.Ct. 45 , 30 L.Ed.2d 50 (1971); United States v. Gargan, 314 F. Supp. 414, 417 (W.D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Labor Relations Board
v.
Burns International Security Services, Inc. (formerly known as William J. Burns International Detective Agency, Inc.) and Burns International Security Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 71-123; No. 71-198.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1971.
404 U.S. 822
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted in No. 71-123. Certiorari granted in No. 71-198 limited to Question 2 presented by the petition which reads as follows:

“2. In such a proceeding, may a sub-contractor who is awarded a contract to provide services at a facility be held to be a successor of the previous sub-contractor and required to bargain with the union representing the previous sub-contractor’s employees, where: (a) there is a total absence of dealings between the two sub-contractors; (b) the previous sub-contractor’s performance at the facility constitutes a small portion of its total business, the balance of which was not affected by the change of sub-contractors; (c) the performance of the contract is integrated into the new sub-contractor’s previously existing business; (d) there is a change in supervision at the facility by the new sub-contractor; and (e) within six months after the awarding of the contract the previous sub-contractor’s employees constitute less than a majority of employees employed at the facility?”

Cases consolidated and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: 441 F. 2d 911.