Sigelbaum v. United States, 404 U.S. 871 (1971). · Go Syfert
Sigelbaum v. United States, 404 U.S. 871 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 9× by 3 distinct cases · "a clear showing of bad faith"
299 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 59 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dreiling v. Peugeot Motors Of America (ca10, 1985-07-24) · Strongest negative: Arthur v. United Air Lines, Inc. (cod, 1987-03-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" Arthur v. United Air Lines, Inc.
D. Colo. · 1987 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n, International, 325 F.Supp. 994, 1003 (D.Minn.1970) (the right to appeal to *367 secondary employees “must obviously carry with it the corresponding right of the non-striking employee to respond”), rev’d and remanded on other grounds, 442 F.2d 246 (8th Cir.1970), cert. den., 404 U.S. 871 , 92 S.Ct. 70 , 30 L.Ed.2d 116 (1971).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Dreiling v. Peugeot Motors Of America
10th Cir. · 1985 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a clear showing of bad faith
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Jaquette v. Black Hawk County
8th Cir. · 1983 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a clear showing of bad faith
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Jaquette v. Black Hawk County
8th Cir. · 1983 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a clear showing of bad faith
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) ca5 1975
5th Cir. · 1975 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
fair, reasonable, and adequate
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1975 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
fair, reasonable, and adequate
discussed Cited "see" Texas Utilities Co. v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc.
N.D. Tex. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Computer Searching Service Corporation v. Ryan, 439 F.2d 6 (2d Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 871 , 92 S.Ct. 62 , 30 L.Ed.2d 115 (1972); United States Pipe and Foundry Company v. N.L.R.B., 398 F.2d 544 (5th Cir.1968); Teas v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 413 F.2d 1263 (5th Cir.1969).
discussed Cited "see" Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Federal Trade Commission (2×)
SCOTUS · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kroger Co. v. FTC, 438 F. 2d 1372 (CA6) (Clark, J.), cert. denied, 404 U. S. 871 (1971).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Anthony J. Giacalone
6th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Aiuppa, 440 F.2d 893, 895 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 871 , 92 S.Ct. 60 , 30 L.Ed.2d 114 (1971).
cited Cited "see" O'Donnell v. Wien Air Alaska, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Northwest Airlines v. ALPA, 442 F.2d 246 (8th Cir. 1970), aff’d on rehearing, 442 F.2d 251 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 871 , 92 S.Ct. 70 , 30 L.Ed.2d 116 (1971).
cited Cited "see" O'donnell v. Wien Air Alaska
9th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Northwest Airlines v. ALPA, 442 F.2d 246 (8th Cir. 1970), aff'd on rehearing, 442 F.2d 251 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 871 , 92 S.Ct. 70 , 30 L.Ed.2d 116 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" Piedmont Aviation, Inc. v. AIR LINE PILOTS ASS'N, INTERNAT'L
M.D.N.C. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Association, International, 442 F.2d 246 (8th Cir. 1970), aff’d on rehearing, 442 F.2d 251 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U. S. 871 , 92 S.Ct. 70 , 30 L.Ed.2d 116 (1971).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. (2×)
SCOTUS · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Assn., Int'l, 442 F. 2d 251, 253-254 (CA8), cert. denied, 404 U. S. 871 (1971).
Sigelbaum
v.
United States
No. 70-167.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1971.
404 U.S. 871

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.