green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Esposito
See Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, supra. See also United States v. Gaines, 441 F.2d 1122 (2 Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 404 U.S. 878 , 92 S.Ct. 223 , 30 L.Ed.2d 159 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Humphreys v. State
(2×)
See Shapiro v. Doe, 396 U.S. 488 , 90 S.Ct. 641 , 24 L.Ed.2d 677 (1970); see also Cheley v. Parham, 404 U.S. 878 , 92 S.Ct. 219 , 30 L.Ed.2d 159 (1971); Beaufort Transfer Co. v. United States, 404 U.S. 806 , 92 S.Ct. 66 , 30 L.Ed.2d 39 (1971); Stein v. Luken, 396 U.S. 555 , 90 S.Ct. 756 , 24 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); United States v. Cotton, 397 U.S. 45 , 90 S.Ct. 816 25 L.Ed.2d 43 (1970); Pittsburgh Towing Co. v. Mississippi Val.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Price Development Company v. Redevelopment Agency Of The City Of Chino
See also Associated Home Builders, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek, 4 Cal.3d 633, 647 , 484 P.2d 606, 617 , 94 Cal.Rptr. 630, 641 , appeal dismissed, 404 U.S. 878 , 92 S.Ct. 202 , 30 L.Ed.2d 159 (1971) (development fees may be utilized only for purposes related to the acquisition and improvement of land). 17 In the present case, a development fee imposed on Haagen for the purpose of reimbursing Price its deposit is neither authorized by the Subdivision Map Act nor does it bear a reasonable relationship to the "[r]egulation and control of the design and improvement of [a] subdivision ..." as requi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Price Development Co. v. Redevelopment Agency
See also Associated Home Builders, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek, 4 Cal.3d 633, 647 , 484 P.2d 606, 617 , 94 Cal.Rptr. 630, 641 , appeal dismissed, 404 U.S. 878 , 92 S.Ct. 202 , 30 L.Ed.2d 159 (1971) (development fees may be utilized only for purposes related to the acquisition and improvement of land).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of College Station v. Turtle Rock Corp.
See, e.g., Associated Home Builders of the Greater East Bay, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek, 4 Cal.3d 633 , 94 Cal.Rptr. 630 , 484 P.2d 606 , appeal dismissed, 404 U.S. 878 , 92 S.Ct. 202 , 30 L.Ed.2d 159 (1971); Home Builders Ass’n of Greater Kansas City v. City of Kansas City, 555 S.W.2d 832 (Mo.1977); Billings Properties, Inc. v. Yellowstone County, 144 Mont. 25 , 394 P.2d 182 (1964); Jenad, Inc. v. Village of Scarsdale, 18 N.Y.2d 78 , 271 N.Y.S.2d 955 , 218 N.E.2d 673 (1966); Banberry Development Corp. v. South Jordan City, 631 P.2d 899 (Utah 1981); Jordan v. Village of Menomonee Falls, 28…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mitchell Rothberg
(2×)
See also United States v. Gaines, 441 F.2d 1122, 1123 (2d Cir.), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 404 U.S. 878 , 92 S.Ct. 223 , 30 L.Ed.2d 159 (1971); United States v. Jordan, 399 F.2d 610, 614-615 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1005 , 89 S.Ct. 496 , 21 L.Ed.2d 469 (1968); United States v. Bracer, 342 F.2d 522, 524 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 954 , 86 S.Ct. 427 , 15 L.Ed.2d 359 (1965). 12 The district court's decision was based upon findings made by an experienced trial judge after a protracted hearing (two weeks, 15 witnesses, and over 1,800 pages of testimony), during which he…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Dionisio
v.
Dionisio
No. 71-229.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 1971.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari as to respondent Smith dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.